Page 12 of 70

Re: International AFL vs International RL

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2012 8:38 am
by Topper
Intentcity wrote:
Well maybe i'm in the wrong place Topper?

And cos, i know you read my pre revised post, and i know you're big on staying on topic, but ****, threads will go in the direction the active posters want them to go, IMO off topic posting isn't a bad thing if the interest in the the OP wasn't there to begin with, of topic discussion actually saves some threads IMO.
I understand that, but I get sick of seeing posters who I can't see anymore because I've blocked them constantly showing up on my screen and then users like yourself saying something that is off topic. It's why I distract by calling them burps, farts or meows. The whole point of the Fight Club is to fight about the subject matter of the OP. Even if it can just be related to it, it will do.

Re: International AFL vs International RL

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2012 12:08 pm
by Raiderdave
Intentcity wrote:
Parra wept. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Image

wheres that from intestines

Paris
London
Auckland
Manchester

:wink:

Re: International AFL vs International RL

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2012 12:09 pm
by Topper
And surprise, surprise. A burp in reply.

Re: International AFL vs International RL

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2012 12:14 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Intentcity wrote:
Parra wept. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Image

wheres that from intestines

Paris
London
Auckland
Manchester

:wink:
That simple home and away AFL game trumps ANYTHING RL can deliver anywhere in the world! :lol:

Re: International AFL vs International RL

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2012 12:43 pm
by cos789
Another website ruined by wookie features






Another website ruined by wookie features
















Another website ruined by wookie features













Another website ruined by wookie features






Another website ruined by wookie features
















Another website ruined by wookie features




















Another website ruined by wookie features






Another website ruined by wookie features
















Another website ruined by wookie features













Another website ruined by wookie features






Another website ruined by wookie features
















Another website ruined by wookie features

























Another website ruined by wookie features






Another website ruined by wookie features
















Another website ruined by wookie features













Another website ruined by wookie features






Another website ruined by wookie features
















Another website ruined by wookie features



























Another website ruined by wookie features






Another website ruined by wookie features
















Another website ruined by wookie features













Another website ruined by wookie features






Another website ruined by wookie features
















Another website ruined by wookie features

Re: International AFL vs International RL

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2012 12:56 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Intentcity wrote:
Parra wept. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Image

wheres that from intestines

Paris
London
Auckland
Manchester

:wink:
That simple home and away AFL game trumps ANYTHING RL can deliver anywhere in the world! :lol:

funny
thought this was a thread about international RL & .... International AFL

international AFL ..... :lol: :lol: :lol:
just writing it makes people laugh :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: International AFL vs International RL

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2012 12:58 pm
by Raiderdave
cos789 wrote:
Topper wrote:
The whole point of the Fight Club is to fight about the subject matter of the OP. Even if it can just be related to it, it will do.
Totally agree and worse than that is having the same argument across all the different topics.
I was challenged to show there was more than 60k people playing Australia Football outside of Australia
and I met that challenge quite simply and easily within the the criteria demanded.
For people to say they don't accept the word of independant government offices like the ABS of DFAT is ridiculous
but then to go on and accept ratings as gospel but only the bits they like is ludicrious.

Parafeel, you say there cannot be that many AR participants overseas because that would outnumber rl participants,
well I'll just have to accept your word that AR participants outnumber rl participants. The good news is that there is three countries close by to Australia that have good and increasing numbers of people playing AR. When more of these players reach senior ranks then there could be big implications.

Parafeel, you didn't accept my challenge out of fear of losing. I am not going to post just to please you.
You don't accept anything and you cannot even add up the simplest of numbers.
If I post my picture of AR overseas then you're just going to deny them for some reason.

you also said most were not expat aussies
yet Parra posted picture after picture after picture ... of teams that were quite obviously ALL ex pat aussies

please
you've been exposed as a wind bag wally

that is all :wink:

Re: International AFL vs International RL

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2012 1:25 pm
by cos789
Another website ruined by wookie features






Another website ruined by wookie features
















Another website ruined by wookie features













Another website ruined by wookie features






Another website ruined by wookie features
















Another website ruined by wookie features




















Another website ruined by wookie features






Another website ruined by wookie features
















Another website ruined by wookie features













Another website ruined by wookie features






Another website ruined by wookie features
















Another website ruined by wookie features

























Another website ruined by wookie features






Another website ruined by wookie features
















Another website ruined by wookie features













Another website ruined by wookie features






Another website ruined by wookie features
















Another website ruined by wookie features



























Another website ruined by wookie features






Another website ruined by wookie features
















Another website ruined by wookie features













Another website ruined by wookie features






Another website ruined by wookie features
















Another website ruined by wookie features

Re: International AFL vs International RL

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2012 2:07 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:

wheres that from intestines

Paris
London
Auckland
Manchester

:wink:
That simple home and away AFL game trumps ANYTHING RL can deliver anywhere in the world! :lol:

funny
thought this was a thread about international RL & .... International AFL

international AFL ..... :lol: :lol: :lol:
just writing it makes people laugh :lol: :lol: :lol:
Funny thing is the AFL and NRL leagues are far and away the biggest leagues of either code world wide.

And on almost every measurable indicator the AFL dwarfs the NRL!

AFL >>>>>>>>> NRL

AR >>>>>>>>>>>> RL

Re: International AFL vs International RL

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2012 3:04 pm
by Raiderdave
cos789 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
You also said most were not expat aussies
Quite obviously when you have figures like

RSA 20k participants
PNG 27k participants
NZ 16k+13k+6700 participants there cannot be many expats.

Parafeel has only proved he likes looking at pretty pictures. Lots of pretty pictures.
He has selected a lot of old photos of some formative teams.
The China Blues for instance are an orignal team in China (I believe). (I don'tknow whether they still exist)
With the help of the Melbourne FC and AFL on Chinese TV AR is booming in China with leagues in Being and Shanghai.
China sent a team to the 2011 IC . There is a photo of the Chinese team on Worldfootynews.com. They look nothing like Aussies to me. Expats are barred from the International Cup.
You might find the original (expat driven) team in Japan, but it plays in one of at least three leagues there now.
I don't go there because all the sites are in Japanese. The French site is in French. I was amazed just how little English is spoken in French Footy - virtually none. I could go on a case by case evaluation and I would if I thought you would be in anyway half sensible. I can address the expat issue easily but it seems you don't accept the 60k participants even though I followed through on all demands ..

more wind from wally

the figures are fudged
the teams are nearly all ex pats having a kick n a giggle in the park ( i saw the photos its obvious )
theres not one shred of evidence of anything else

that is all :wink:

Re: International AFL vs International RL

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2012 3:08 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
That simple home and away AFL game trumps ANYTHING RL can deliver anywhere in the world! :lol:

funny
thought this was a thread about international RL & .... International AFL

international AFL ..... :lol: :lol: :lol:
just writing it makes people laugh :lol: :lol: :lol:
Funny thing is the AFL and NRL leagues are far and away the biggest leagues of either code world wide.

And on almost every measurable indicator the AFL dwarfs the NRL!

AFL >>>>>>>>> NRL

AR >>>>>>>>>>>> RL

I see you've reverted to ... almost

good boy =D>

fact is most Australians prefer League
136 Million sets of peepers watching it in 2011 .. to just 128 Million watching AFL
is proof

a few big crowds confined to Melbourne can't change this :wink:

Re: International AFL vs International RL

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2012 3:17 pm
by Topper
Of course the burp machine can only burp when confronted with the number of countries that play AFL outside of Australia. Well ahead of the number that play RL. In fact only two team sports that I know of can claim more countries. Soccer and cricket.

Re: International AFL vs International RL

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2012 3:21 pm
by Raiderdave
Topper wrote:
Of course the burp machine can only burp when confronted with the number of countries that play AFL outside of Australia. Well ahead of the number that play RL. In fact only two team sports that I know of can claim more countries. Soccer and cricket.

get it right will you

its the number of countries with ex pats from the sthn parts of aust .. who grab some garbage bins for goal posts for a kick at the park

sheez .... when will you learn [-X

Re: International AFL vs International RL

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2012 3:27 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Raiderdave wrote:
Intentcity wrote:
Parra wept. :lol: :lol: :lol:




wheres that from intestines

Paris
London
Auckland
Manchester

:wink:
Touche :lol:

Re: International AFL vs International RL

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2012 3:28 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
cos789 wrote:
Topper wrote:
The whole point of the Fight Club is to fight about the subject matter of the OP. Even if it can just be related to it, it will do.
Totally agree and worse than that is having the same argument across all the different topics.
I was challenged to show there was more than 60k people playing Australia Football outside of Australia
and I met that challenge quite simply and easily within the the criteria demanded.
For people to say they don't accept the word of independant government offices like the ABS of DFAT is ridiculous
but then to go on and accept ratings as gospel but only the bits they like is ludicrious.

Parafeel, you say there cannot be that many AR participants overseas because that would outnumber rl participants,
well I'll just have to accept your word that AR participants outnumber rl participants. The good news is that there is three countries close by to Australia that have good and increasing numbers of people playing AR. When more of these players reach senior ranks then there could be big implications.

Parafeel, you didn't accept my challenge out of fear of losing. I am not going to post just to please you.
You don't accept anything and you cannot even add up the simplest of numbers.
If I post my picture of AR overseas then you're just going to deny them for some reason.
How the fark would your mythical 60k out number RL participants in other countries you ****** when there's well over 200,000 in the UK alone?

Dumarse.