NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
The facts are there for everyone to see. Deny the possibility of fudging. At present it exists.
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
cooee wrote:It's innocent till proven guilty not guilty till proven innocent.
yes quite right ...
when we say something we have to prove it
when they say something we have to disprove it
Fwits .... the lot of em
get ready .... we're not too far away from complete anarchy again

RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
Prove that the Leagues Clubs have no connection in any way shape or form with the rugby clubs.
Then I'll shut up.
Then I'll shut up.
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
it'd be Rugby League clubs you concussed wombatNSWAFL wrote:Prove that the Leagues Clubs have no connection in any way shape or form with the rugby clubs.
Then I'll shut up.
connection ? what does that mean ?
does one run the other ?...... rarely
the Raiders " own " their premises ... 10 different licensed clubs
they absolutely control their clubs
but this is a rare example
most RL clubs have little or no control ova their leagues club
more obvious proof
& two words
reduced grants
if RL clubs controlled Leagues clubs , they'd take as much as they needed out of them
but the grants from Leagues clubs have been reducing for ova a decade now
proving ..... no connection as poor a term as that is
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

- cos789
- Coach
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:43 pm
- Team: Wookie is a failed pathetic ugly woman
- Location:
Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
As a campaigner for Australian Native wildlife I find the use of "wombat" in this case to be quite offensive.Raiderdave wrote:you concussed wombat
I'm sure KE would find it offensive too because a wombat is native to Australia.
Nice try Cos.
- cos789
- Coach
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:43 pm
- Team: Wookie is a failed pathetic ugly woman
- Location:
Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
He can't.NSWAFL wrote:Prove that the Leagues Clubs have no connection in any way shape or form with the rugby clubs.
Then I'll shut up.
In another thread I posted a link that a certain rls club, not only was promoting nrl club memberships as well as club memberships, the nrl club was promoting the rls club membership as wholely nrl club memberships.
Nice try Cos.
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
you'd only be offended because we're talking about yr missuscos789 wrote:As a campaigner for Australian Native wildlife I find the use of "wombat" in this case to be quite offensive.Raiderdave wrote:you concussed wombat
I'm sure KE would find it offensive too because a wombat is native to Australia.




RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
prove itcos789 wrote:He can't.NSWAFL wrote:Prove that the Leagues Clubs have no connection in any way shape or form with the rugby clubs.
Then I'll shut up.
In another thread I posted a link that a certain rls club, not only was promoting nrl club memberships as well as club memberships, the nrl club was promoting the rls club membership as wholely nrl club memberships.
prove that a $10 membership to said RSL club was a membership of any sort to said NRL club .... or any NRL club
I think you'll struggle
& then we'll just have our resident Biased Moderator not do to this post
what he would if it was me making the same claim about an AFL club
just think I'll start saying this sort of stuff .... doesn't seem to matter
ah the bias
ah the inconsistency




RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

-
- Seniors
- Posts: 303
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 5:11 pm
- Team: All Brisbane based teams except the Lions
- Location:
Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
Can you repost the link. I certainly like to read it for myself.cos789 wrote:He can't.NSWAFL wrote:Prove that the Leagues Clubs have no connection in any way shape or form with the rugby clubs.
Then I'll shut up.
In another thread I posted a link that a certain rls club, not only was promoting nrl club memberships as well as club memberships, the nrl club was promoting the rls club membership as wholely nrl club memberships.
- cos789
- Coach
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:43 pm
- Team: Wookie is a failed pathetic ugly woman
- Location:
Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
Well I'd like you rl folk to be a little more sensible or at least post links to references.cooee wrote:Can you repost the link. I certainly like to read it for myself.cos789 wrote:He can't.NSWAFL wrote:Prove that the Leagues Clubs have no connection in any way shape or form with the rugby clubs.
Then I'll shut up.
In another thread I posted a link that a certain rls club, not only was promoting nrl club memberships as well as club memberships, the nrl club was promoting the rls club membership as wholely nrl club memberships.
Do we have a deal ?
Because I need some incentive to sift through a barrow load of recent nonsense.
Nice try Cos.
-
- Seniors
- Posts: 303
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 5:11 pm
- Team: All Brisbane based teams except the Lions
- Location:
Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
I can't speak for Raiders but I've always included links to any reference I have used.
- cos789
- Coach
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:43 pm
- Team: Wookie is a failed pathetic ugly woman
- Location:
Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
Quite possibly true.cooee wrote:I can't speak for Raiders but I've always included links to any reference I have used.
I'll see what I can do..... but I'm in no hurry.
Nice try Cos.
Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
For me as well, Cos. I missed it and I want to see it. And if Topper's still looking I'm sure he'd want to see it as well.
Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
At this stage the original accusation against RL teams does not appear to be proven different to the non ticketed memberships offered by the AFL teams.
Unless evidence is found promptly the thread will be deleted.
Unless evidence is found promptly the thread will be deleted.
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
Re: NRL Fudged Membership Numbers
Or can we just call this thread a win to the league supporters?

xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?