Talking Footy

Raiderdave wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

owned outright ...............land n all

Prove it!

you claimed they don't

you prove that F.uckstick ...

No one can prove a negative, doofus! So you prove it!

Or am I going to make a second BS call on you?

NSWAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

Prove it!

you claimed they don't

you prove that F.uckstick ...

No one can prove a negative, doofus! So you prove it!

Or am I going to make a second BS call on you?

I'm seriously considering calling BS on Raider's claims that RL rates better than Super 15 in NZ and Sky TV is willing to pay more for the NRL tv rights.

Still waiting on those sources Raider.

Oh I'm smelling two BS files now!

Raiderdave wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

im·mi·nent (m-nnt)
adj.
About to occur; impending: in imminent danger.

So it's today? Link us to the news then, Dave.

its about to occur ...........anytime now

Seems like someone has been caught out lying!

http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... 1qztw.html

The Raiders' chief executive, Don Furner, said last week that if the club didn't have a sponsor in place by season kick-off the publicity generated by playing games should assist their cause

There you have it! They have no potential major sponsor. Nothing is in the pipeline just ready to be announced any minute. They are now waiting for the season to start in hope someone will see how pathetic they look without a sponsor, and jump on.

Tragic!

Oh given what I was just told on the phone before I came on here, Dave's the bigest BS artist on the planet!

announcement imminent ..........

You're lying.

Commission's first act - axe the Raiders and Sharks ?

Way to go Gallop.

cos789 wrote:

Commission's first act - axe the Raiders and Sharks ?

Way to go Gallop.

the effect of the RD.... right here for all to see

under one's skin much

Surely you wouldn't be so imbecilic to suggest that RD is under anyone's skin.
For what reason ?
AF is going fine - rl isn't.
The only irritant is your lack of logic and common sense.

cos789 wrote:

Surely you wouldn't be so imbecilic to suggest that RD is under anyone's skin.
For what reason ?
AF is going fine - rl isn't.
The only irritant is your lack of logic and common sense.

I'm under your skin ...so much so your ranting & raving
& rambling non sensically
dribbling
w@nking off about garbage most posts

then again
maybe thats just you

If you are under anyone's skin it's because you constantly lie and refuse to be held accountable for it.

NSWAFL wrote:

If you are under anyone's skin it's because you constantly lie and refuse to be held accountable for it.

nawwww...... there there pet

So the wait continues for the Raiders. Even the Sharks look like they may have a sponsor lined up. Poor sponsorless unloved Raiders on the other hand.... well....the search continues for corporate interest/support.

Beaussie wrote:

So the wait continues for the Raiders. Even the Sharks look like they may have a sponsor lined up. Poor sponsorless unloved Raiders on the other hand.... well....the search continues for corporate interest/support.

announcement imminent ............