Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2011 11:48 am
There all there. http://www.thinktv.com.au/SiteMedia/w3s ... 5_2011.pdfBeaussie wrote:Not sure what to do about Game 2 with that being the case. Only AGBNielsen provides the market breakdowns.
Page 12 of 14
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2011 11:57 am
Didn't Beaussie say that TAM was bullshit?
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2011 11:57 am
Yeah that only gives you the totalpussycat wrote:There all there. http://www.thinktv.com.au/SiteMedia/w3s ... 5_2011.pdfBeaussie wrote:Not sure what to do about Game 2 with that being the case. Only AGBNielsen provides the market breakdowns.
Beaussie is after the breakdown which is only available on regionaltam which is on the blink ATM
NNSW
SNSW
QLD
VIC
TAS... will only come up if origin made the top 20 shows there for that week
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2011 11:58 am
That's why Beaussie said it was bullshit! That's not all of Australia!
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2011 12:20 pm
OKOnions wrote:That's why Beaussie said it was bullshit! That's not all of Australia!
I will try n explain it ... & maybe you should try & respond without name calling ... glib remarks ... or pointless observations
lets see if you do in fact have any debating skills
look at these maps
http://www.oztam.com.au/pdf/TV_ratings/ ... e_maps.pdf
they are maps for coverage of all Capital Cities
the complaint from AFL fans is that the regional populations of SA & WA are ignored in the ratings
this is only partly true ... as almost all are taken into account .. on these maps
the coverage map for Perth attached .. covers a population of over 2 Million .. yet Perths population is only 1.6 million
the difference being satellite cities & regional areas near Perth
same for Adelaide
coverage map .. covers 1.5 Million people
Adelaides population about 1.2 Million
whats left is hardly anything ... 300K combined in both states at most
& NT .. 200K
so ratings about on par with Tasmania
all good ?........... good
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2011 12:48 pm
No, bad. That was a mess that was just typical of you, kid!
Go back to school and come back when you can present a decent point. If you don't cover all of Australia it's bullshit! Stop making excuses just to make yourself look smart when you're not.
Whoa - forgot. Answer the new thread. Or are you too scared to?
Here's challenge for you. Where do you get the population differences? It's not on the link you gave! No way is it 1.5 million for Adelaide metro. Absolutely no way is it over 2 million for Perth metro! And don't fucking ignore the Territory or Tasmania, dickhead!!
Go back to school and come back when you can present a decent point. If you don't cover all of Australia it's bullshit! Stop making excuses just to make yourself look smart when you're not.
Whoa - forgot. Answer the new thread. Or are you too scared to?
Here's challenge for you. Where do you get the population differences? It's not on the link you gave! No way is it 1.5 million for Adelaide metro. Absolutely no way is it over 2 million for Perth metro! And don't fucking ignore the Territory or Tasmania, dickhead!!
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2011 9:12 pm
Beaussie and MarkZZ, Great to see the pair of you take the stand and make a bet on crowds. It is unfortunate though that AAMI only holds 30k, if it was 50k there'd be no doubts the SOO would take the cake.
Will be a close one me thinks.
Will be a close one me thinks.
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2011 9:53 pm
Big chuncks of SA, WA and the entire NT are not included. My biggest gripe with regionals though is all the double counting. Take Brisbane that includes Gold Coast also covered by RegionalTAM. It's a mess and not reliable if you ask me or many others... not just AFL fans.Raiderdave wrote:OKOnions wrote:That's why Beaussie said it was bullshit! That's not all of Australia!
I will try n explain it ... & maybe you should try & respond without name calling ... glib remarks ... or pointless observations
lets see if you do in fact have any debating skills
look at these maps
http://www.oztam.com.au/pdf/TV_ratings/ ... e_maps.pdf
they are maps for coverage of all Capital Cities
the complaint from AFL fans is that the regional populations of SA & WA are ignored in the ratings
this is only partly true ... as almost all are taken into account .. on these maps
the coverage map for Perth attached .. covers a population of over 2 Million .. yet Perths population is only 1.6 million
the difference being satellite cities & regional areas near Perth
same for Adelaide
coverage map .. covers 1.5 Million people
Adelaides population about 1.2 Million
whats left is hardly anything ... 300K combined in both states at most
& NT .. 200K
so ratings about on par with Tasmania
all good ?........... good
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2011 9:11 am
500K regional victorians are also included in Melbournes figures too BeaussieBeaussie wrote:Big chuncks of SA, WA and the entire NT are not included. My biggest gripe with regionals though is all the double counting. Take Brisbane that includes Gold Coast also covered by RegionalTAM. It's a mess and not reliable if you ask me or many others... not just AFL fans.Raiderdave wrote:OKOnions wrote:That's why Beaussie said it was bullshit! That's not all of Australia!
I will try n explain it ... & maybe you should try & respond without name calling ... glib remarks ... or pointless observations
lets see if you do in fact have any debating skills
look at these maps
http://www.oztam.com.au/pdf/TV_ratings/ ... e_maps.pdf
they are maps for coverage of all Capital Cities
the complaint from AFL fans is that the regional populations of SA & WA are ignored in the ratings
this is only partly true ... as almost all are taken into account .. on these maps
the coverage map for Perth attached .. covers a population of over 2 Million .. yet Perths population is only 1.6 million
the difference being satellite cities & regional areas near Perth
same for Adelaide
coverage map .. covers 1.5 Million people
Adelaides population about 1.2 Million
whats left is hardly anything ... 300K combined in both states at most
& NT .. 200K
so ratings about on par with Tasmania
all good ?........... good
more then covering GC / Brissie
are these people double counted in both the regional figures for VIC & Melb..
I'd say they are ............ hmmmm
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2011 9:25 am
I didn't look closely at the Melbourne OzTAM map. If that's the case, then yeah it just reinforces my point (and many other I must add) as to why suggestions that regional tv ratings should be taken into acouunt is a joke. They are a very unreliable source for tv ratings, even you allude to that above.Raiderdave wrote:500K regional victorians are also included in Melbournes figures too BeaussieBeaussie wrote:Big chuncks of SA, WA and the entire NT are not included. My biggest gripe with regionals though is all the double counting. Take Brisbane that includes Gold Coast also covered by RegionalTAM. It's a mess and not reliable if you ask me or many others... not just AFL fans.Raiderdave wrote:OK
I will try n explain it ... & maybe you should try & respond without name calling ... glib remarks ... or pointless observations
lets see if you do in fact have any debating skills
look at these maps
http://www.oztam.com.au/pdf/TV_ratings/ ... e_maps.pdf
they are maps for coverage of all Capital Cities
the complaint from AFL fans is that the regional populations of SA & WA are ignored in the ratings
this is only partly true ... as almost all are taken into account .. on these maps
the coverage map for Perth attached .. covers a population of over 2 Million .. yet Perths population is only 1.6 million
the difference being satellite cities & regional areas near Perth
same for Adelaide
coverage map .. covers 1.5 Million people
Adelaides population about 1.2 Million
whats left is hardly anything ... 300K combined in both states at most
& NT .. 200K
so ratings about on par with Tasmania
all good ?........... good
more then covering GC / Brissie
are these people double counted in both the regional figures for VIC & Melb..
I'd say they are ............ hmmmm
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2011 10:19 am
500K??? Go fuck yourself, raider Boy. You KNOW that's not true and you refuse to even show us proof! Just like when I shut you down on South Australia and Western Australia! NO PROOF!Raiderdave wrote:500K regional victorians are also included in Melbournes figures too BeaussieBeaussie wrote:Big chuncks of SA, WA and the entire NT are not included. My biggest gripe with regionals though is all the double counting. Take Brisbane that includes Gold Coast also covered by RegionalTAM. It's a mess and not reliable if you ask me or many others... not just AFL fans.Raiderdave wrote:OK
I will try n explain it ... & maybe you should try & respond without name calling ... glib remarks ... or pointless observations
lets see if you do in fact have any debating skills
look at these maps
http://www.oztam.com.au/pdf/TV_ratings/ ... e_maps.pdf
they are maps for coverage of all Capital Cities
the complaint from AFL fans is that the regional populations of SA & WA are ignored in the ratings
this is only partly true ... as almost all are taken into account .. on these maps
the coverage map for Perth attached .. covers a population of over 2 Million .. yet Perths population is only 1.6 million
the difference being satellite cities & regional areas near Perth
same for Adelaide
coverage map .. covers 1.5 Million people
Adelaides population about 1.2 Million
whats left is hardly anything ... 300K combined in both states at most
& NT .. 200K
so ratings about on par with Tasmania
all good ?........... good
more then covering GC / Brissie
are these people double counted in both the regional figures for VIC & Melb..
I'd say they are ............ hmmmm
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 2:49 pm
If a region gets dual Tv signals, eg. the Gold Coast gets both 7 and Prime or 9 and Win, How does this affect the ratings as far as football numbers are concerned? A person can only be watching one station, either 7 or prime, not both. So if you got a larger or smaller figure for Brisbane (due to the GC reading) your going to get a mirror opposite reading for regional Qld. And in the end, as far as the ratings for the football codes go, there would be no difference whatsoever.Beaussie wrote:I didn't look closely at the Melbourne OzTAM map. If that's the case, then yeah it just reinforces my point (and many other I must add) as to why suggestions that regional tv ratings should be taken into acouunt is a joke. They are a very unreliable source for tv ratings, even you allude to that above.Raiderdave wrote:500K regional victorians are also included in Melbournes figures too BeaussieBeaussie wrote:Big chuncks of SA, WA and the entire NT are not included. My biggest gripe with regionals though is all the double counting. Take Brisbane that includes Gold Coast also covered by RegionalTAM. It's a mess and not reliable if you ask me or many others... not just AFL fans.
more then covering GC / Brissie
are these people double counted in both the regional figures for VIC & Melb..
I'd say they are ............ hmmmm
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 4:20 pm
Hey Kitten, according to your precious fucked up systems OzTam counts metro only and RegionalTAM counts regional only. Right? So the point is if Gold Coast is seen as regional according to little fuck up Raider Boy, OzTam AND RegionalTAM will count it in their seperate surveys!! DOUBLE COUNT!!
I see that Raider Boy as usual won't back up that 500K crock of shit from Melbourne surrounds with proof! Oh the silence on that is fucking DEAFENING!
I see that Raider Boy as usual won't back up that 500K crock of shit from Melbourne surrounds with proof! Oh the silence on that is fucking DEAFENING!
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 4:46 pm
Metro only counts Ch. 7,9,2,10 and SBS.
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 5:12 pm
All five channels go across each fucking state!!! Get into the real world will you?