Talking Footy

NlolRL wrote: Fri Mar 30, 2018 5:02 pm

#TVratings Thursday STV #AFL #FoxFooty #AFLCrowsTigers 252k
#TVratings Thursday #AFL #Seven #7mate #AFLCrowsTigers #Seven 510k (Mel 366k Ade 144k) #7mate 128k
Regional estimate 209k = 1.1m

NRL total = 839k

Game's ladder factors were 1.5 to the AFL compared to 7.5 to the NRL

Ongoing tally is 3-0 to the AFL
AFL's ongoing ladder factor is 4.6
NRL's ongoing ladder factor is 5.8

I know this ladder factor carry of yours is just shit, but curiosity has got the better of me. Just how does this theory work?

pussycat wrote: Fri Mar 30, 2018 6:52 pm

NlolRL wrote: Fri Mar 30, 2018 5:02 pm

#TVratings Thursday STV #AFL #FoxFooty #AFLCrowsTigers 252k
#TVratings Thursday #AFL #Seven #7mate #AFLCrowsTigers #Seven 510k (Mel 366k Ade 144k) #7mate 128k
Regional estimate 209k = 1.1m

NRL total = 839k

Game's ladder factors were 1.5 to the AFL compared to 7.5 to the NRL

Ongoing tally is 3-0 to the AFL
AFL's ongoing ladder factor is 4.6
NRL's ongoing ladder factor is 5.8

I know this ladder factor carry of yours is just shit, but curiosity has got the better of me. Just how does this theory work?

Ladder positions of the 2 competing clubs are added together and divided by 2 to get an average. Thats the games ladder factor. The ongoing factor is the average of all games so far. For the first 11 rounds laat years ladder is used. From then on this year's ladder is used. So far it shows the AFLs 3 games involved higher laddee positioned sides but only just

NlolRL wrote: Fri Mar 30, 2018 7:52 pm

pussycat wrote: Fri Mar 30, 2018 6:52 pm

NlolRL wrote: Fri Mar 30, 2018 5:02 pm

#TVratings Thursday STV #AFL #FoxFooty #AFLCrowsTigers 252k
#TVratings Thursday #AFL #Seven #7mate #AFLCrowsTigers #Seven 510k (Mel 366k Ade 144k) #7mate 128k
Regional estimate 209k = 1.1m

NRL total = 839k

Game's ladder factors were 1.5 to the AFL compared to 7.5 to the NRL

Ongoing tally is 3-0 to the AFL
AFL's ongoing ladder factor is 4.6
NRL's ongoing ladder factor is 5.8

I know this ladder factor carry of yours is just shit, but curiosity has got the better of me. Just how does this theory work?

Ladder positions of the 2 competing clubs are added together and divided by 2 to get an average. Thats the games ladder factor. The ongoing factor is the average of all games so far. For the first 11 rounds laat years ladder is used. From then on this year's ladder is used. So far it shows the AFLs 3 games involved higher laddee positioned sides but only just

So what is it supposed to prove? In light of the fact that many of your bottom teams get 0 or 1 games, how is your latest theory any more relevant than the others ????

Its there to show your excuse about the nrl showing more bootom ladder sides is bs

NlolRL wrote: Fri Mar 30, 2018 10:45 pm

Its there to show your excuse about the nrl showing more bootom ladder sides is bs

Stroke, stroke, stroke.......and around the bowl he goes......lololololololololo. Dill!!!!!!

Thanks as always for your feedback PT.

Yeah, well good luck with that.

If you want a fair indication, add up the ladder position of the teams that play on a Friday/Thursday night and divide by the number of teams.
1 v 3 etc. doesn't indicate how you favour your to teams.

We will just ignore the fact that over 20% of your teams don't play in those main slots.

pussycat wrote: Sat Mar 31, 2018 9:52 am

Yeah, well good luck with that.

If you want a fair indication, add up the ladder position of the teams that play on a Friday/Thursday night and divide by the number of teams.
1 v 3 etc. doesn't indicate how you favour your to teams.

We will just ignore the fact that over 20% of your teams don't play in those main slots.

Your equation is stupid. You average the ladder positions and divide by the games to give an average of the ladder positions.

Your excuse about the bottom 20% is also stupid because the NRL rarely show their bottom teams on these nights either. Both codes play their better teams and better matches on these nights, so its as fair a comparison as we will get.

And what happened tp Thursday night? Barely scraped over 800k. Thats horrendous

Lions, Suns, a Perth team , Nth Melb . 4 of 18 not shown = 22%.

We already know how uneven your comp is. you only need look at the scores each week.

pussycat wrote: Sat Mar 31, 2018 10:39 am

Lions, Suns, a Perth team , Nth Melb . 4 of 18 not shown = 22%.

We already know how uneven your comp is. you only need look at the scores each week.

How many games do bottom 4 nrl sides get on friday night?

Stop with your excuses. Your best games are usually friday night and they get beaten

3-1 to the AFL

Lol Mr Tv
Now there's an impartial AFL man who has never been caught out

Are the figures i posted incorrect?

(Nine) Fri night

Cron v Melb

-TOT: 1.01m
>Nat: 737k
~5 city: 452k
▪SYD: 192k
▪MEL: 73k (main channel)
▪BRI: 171k
~Reg: 285k
>Fox: 271k

NlolRL wrote: Sat Mar 31, 2018 11:04 am

pussycat wrote: Sat Mar 31, 2018 10:39 am

Lions, Suns, a Perth team , Nth Melb . 4 of 18 not shown = 22%.

We already know how uneven your comp is. you only need look at the scores each week.

How many games do bottom 4 nrl sides get on friday night?

Stop with your excuses. Your best games are usually friday night and they get beaten

AFL: worst 4 = 0
NRL: worst 4 = 11matchews