Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:30 pm
It'd be nice to have rep footy, TLPG! Then we'd get even more crowds!
www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
TLPG wrote:We don't need rep footy to be a success. You lot do. Our International Cup attracts more countries than the RL World Cup.pussycat wrote:Thats right, Origin Match,- IE. RUGBY LEAGUE !!! Or shouln't I talk about that?is it unfair of me to mention that because your pathetic game dos'nt have rep footy? And are unable to find anyone else to play against.TLPG wrote:That 90K was a State of Origin game, Pussycat. And how did the WA side do? Terrible! News Limited tried to do a Kerry Packer with World Series Cricket - and guess what's ultimately happened? Unlike WSC, epic fail!
The Perth Reds did very well. And since, have been pounding down the NRL's door seeking readmittance. They are the leading canditate for admittance.
Where are the screams for the Perth Reds? I'm not hearing a thing! The NRL has no room for expansion at present because it's gone as far as it can go. The salary cap has to go up and I don't think it will.
pussycat wrote:TLPG wrote:We don't need rep footy to be a success. You lot do. Our International Cup attracts more countries than the RL World Cup.pussycat wrote:Thats right, Origin Match,- IE. RUGBY LEAGUE !!! Or shouln't I talk about that?is it unfair of me to mention that because your pathetic game dos'nt have rep footy? And are unable to find anyone else to play against.
The Perth Reds did very well. And since, have been pounding down the NRL's door seeking readmittance. They are the leading canditate for admittance.
Where are the screams for the Perth Reds? I'm not hearing a thing! The NRL has no room for expansion at present because it's gone as far as it can go. The salary cap has to go up and I don't think it will.
You do need it, and you try like hell to get itt - but no one else is interested. You pick a 'best' team each year and the sad pathetic bunch just play with each other.
You International cup
more countriesTLPG wrote:We don't need rep footy to be a success. You lot do. Our International Cup attracts more countries than the RL World Cup.Where are the screams for the Perth Reds? I'm not hearing a thing! The NRL has no room for expansion at present because it's gone as far as it can go. The salary cap has to go up and I don't think it will.pussycat wrote:Thats right, Origin Match,- IE. RUGBY LEAGUE !!! Or shouln't I talk about that?is it unfair of me to mention that because your pathetic game dos'nt have rep footy? And are unable to find anyone else to play against.TLPG wrote:That 90K was a State of Origin game, Pussycat. And how did the WA side do? Terrible! News Limited tried to do a Kerry Packer with World Series Cricket - and guess what's ultimately happened? Unlike WSC, epic fail!
The Perth Reds did very well. And since, have been pounding down the NRL's door seeking readmittance. They are the leading canditate for admittance.
You're a fool. We don't need it and we don't want it because with three equal states there isn't room. I notice that you didn't provide any links to prove that there are hundreds of rugby fans in Perth pleading for their own RL team in the NRL. Where's the government backing for it (like they have in Tasmania)? Where are the stories about the protests? Come on, give!pussycat wrote:pussycat wrote:You do need it, and you try like hell to get itt - but no one else is interested. You pick a 'best' team each year and the sad pathetic bunch just play with each other.
You International cup
Maybe that's because there there not screaming at you
TLPG wrote:You're a fool. We don't need it and we don't want it because with three equal states there isn't room. I notice that you didn't provide any links to prove that there are hundreds of rugby fans in Perth pleading for their own RL team in the NRL. Where's the government backing for it (like they have in Tasmania)? Where are the stories about the protests? Come on, give!pussycat wrote:pussycat wrote:You do need it, and you try like hell to get itt - but no one else is interested. You pick a 'best' team each year and the sad pathetic bunch just play with each other.
You International cup
Maybe that's because there there not screaming at you
I usually ignore KE but in this case I'll make an exception by listing the 15 countries that played in the 2008 International Cup, of which the grand final was played at the MCG as an entertaining curtain raiser to an AFL game;
New Zealand
Canada
Ireland
USA
South Africa
Papua New Guinea (who won it)
Samoa
Great Britain
Nauru
Japan
Denmark
Sweden
India
Finland
China
And that's just who were able to field a team!
I understand that even more countries are playing in the next Cup, which is this year. And I don't believe you over Amsterdam v Paris!
WhyAFFP wrote:According to TLPG, PNG won the AFL International Cup. Pretty good for a country who's national sport is supposedly something else! If Australia is so strong in rugby league, why don't they just step aside like they did in the International Cup?
Here's a fact. AFL clubs don't want rep football. They want club football. Great dedication to the game. More than can be said for the rep happy NRL! There's more whining about midweek rep games in State of Origin than there is whining about a lack of it in AFL!
rep happyAFFP wrote:According to TLPG, PNG won the AFL International Cup. Pretty good for a country who's national sport is supposedly something else! If Australia is so strong in rugby league, why don't they just step aside like they did in the International Cup?
Here's a fact. AFL clubs don't want rep football. They want club football. Great dedication to the game. More than can be said for the rep happy NRL! There's more whining about midweek rep games in State of Origin than there is whining about a lack of it in AFL!
well boggerball fans are pretty good at .. playing with themselvespussycat wrote:WhyAFFP wrote:According to TLPG, PNG won the AFL International Cup. Pretty good for a country who's national sport is supposedly something else! If Australia is so strong in rugby league, why don't they just step aside like they did in the International Cup?
Here's a fact. AFL clubs don't want rep football. They want club football. Great dedication to the game. More than can be said for the rep happy NRL! There's more whining about midweek rep games in State of Origin than there is whining about a lack of it in AFL!it's the world cup - do Brazil step aside in Soccer, NZ in Union or Australia in cricket? This isn't pretend.
Your only saying that because you don't have it. Why else would be trying to promote the game overseas. Ask your own fans or officials, theres nothing they'd enjoy more than having someone to play with.
TLPG wrote:No Raider that's your stupid game. Thurston would have been rubbed out in the AFL.
We're developing the game overseas. What are the NRL doing about game development in new areas, hmmmm? I know - bugger all because you're too busy trying to find the extra money to support the game locally!!
http://www.aussierules.nl/TLPG wrote:I usually ignore KE but in this case I'll make an exception by listing the 15 countries that played in the 2008 International Cup, of which the grand final was played at the MCG as an entertaining curtain raiser to an AFL game;
New Zealand
Canada
Ireland
USA
South Africa
Papua New Guinea (who won it)
Samoa
Great Britain
Nauru
Japan
Denmark
Sweden
India
Finland
China
And that's just who were able to field a team!
I understand that even more countries are playing in the next Cup, which is this year. And I don't believe you over Amsterdam v Paris!