Talking Footy

Fred wrote:

Pfffft ... Keep trying ... The phelpsy username is still there for all to see.

It was a lesson for you from your welching of the drac bet .

I shall call you banjo from now on . Played you like the squealing pig you are :$

Is that why no one but urself has stood up in ur defence?

As for the no bet with dwac? It was basically only you and nrlcrap who assumed a bet took place. Everyone else understood if not signed and agreed and that I was actually "leaning towards the AFL on that one"

Noone's supporting ya freddy ya filthy stalking welcher, no one! Not even dwac!!!

You simply couldn't have given urself a harder uppercut

Carry on now

Nope, beaussie and drac too ... I think only dave agreed with you ... But that doesn't count.


Good try banjo

Beaussie said the Fred name should be deleted ya lying *****!

Where'd dwac support you? Please link

No you idiot ... They both called you out for welching ..... Idiot

And hence I taught you a lesson ... Honoured my bet but definitely not in the spirit ... But definitely technically correct.

Da de dum dum dum dum dum dum dum....

NlolRL wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Why will ASADA give Essendrug players a reduced penalty.
If they had taken the offer when first offered they would probably have copped the same as the Cronulla players.
But the big big difference is the way it was handled.
NRL sat back & let AASADA do what they had to with no interference.
The AFL & Essingbong did the opposite.
Obstructed,blocked threatened,& then took legal action against ASADA.
Dragged the ASADA name through the mud with their nedia mouth pieces.
Then there was VLAD trying to do dodgy deals behind the scenes.

I don't know about you ,but if I was ASADA ,then this club should pay the full price.
Revenge is sweet .
NRL came out of this smelling like a rose.
AFL ,a stinking pile of excretement.

well the AFL actually assisted the asada investigation according to judge middleton, they allowed them powers beyond tose available to asada at the time.

if you think 3 week bans makes the NRL smell like roses you obvisouly have avoided social media. it was roundly criticised for being limp wristed

Fuck you are thick
I am talking about the investigation. Not the penalties.
Cronulla after a chat by Smith went along with ASADA.
Easing bong did all they could to disrupt,stall threaten ,try to get info thrown out etc. even dragged the investigating body to court.
But you being a brainwashed southern hick can't see the difference.

Fred wrote:

And hence I taught you a lesson ... Honoured my bet but definitely not in the spirit ... But definitely technically correct.

Da de dum dum dum dum dum dum dum....

gutless spineless yellow welching *****
every poster on these boards believes you are the above

this tag will never leave you while you hide behind another username like the gutless ***** you are

Lol

AFLcrap1 wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Why will ASADA give Essendrug players a reduced penalty.
If they had taken the offer when first offered they would probably have copped the same as the Cronulla players.
But the big big difference is the way it was handled.
NRL sat back & let AASADA do what they had to with no interference.
The AFL & Essingbong did the opposite.
Obstructed,blocked threatened,& then took legal action against ASADA.
Dragged the ASADA name through the mud with their nedia mouth pieces.
Then there was VLAD trying to do dodgy deals behind the scenes.

I don't know about you ,but if I was ASADA ,then this club should pay the full price.
Revenge is sweet .
NRL came out of this smelling like a rose.
AFL ,a stinking pile of excretement.

well the AFL actually assisted the asada investigation according to judge middleton, they allowed them powers beyond tose available to asada at the time.

if you think 3 week bans makes the NRL smell like roses you obvisouly have avoided social media. it was roundly criticised for being limp wristed

Fuck you are thick
I am talking about the investigation. Not the penalties.
Cronulla after a chat by Smith went along with ASADA.
Easing bong did all they could to disrupt,stall threaten ,try to get info thrown out etc. even dragged the investigating body to court.
But you being a brainwashed southern hick can't see the difference.

the court case was about THE INVESTIGATION you complete knob!

according to Middleton it was perfectly legal and in fact advantaged by being a joint investigation with a sporting body. in fact he specifically mention that joint investigations are to be encouraged if that is what is required to get the required outcome.

1:42pm: Middleton: Based upon the evidence I conclude:
- By 1 Feb 2013, both ASADA and AFL had agreed to investigate Essendon, and had concluded that ASADA should use AFL powers.
- ASADA would have decided to investigate Essendon anyway, regardless of coercive powers.
- Hird, Essendon and 34 players all co-operated because of contractual obligations to AFL.
- Hird, Essendon and players all complied.
- Info was simultaneously divulged.
- The investigation required co-ordination between AFL and ASADA with regard to procedure/conduct.
- ASADA benefited from co-operation of AFL due to AFL's compulsory powers.
- ASADA and AFL made two separate decisions in the areas of their own responsibilities.
Upvotes:6 Downvotes:3 Copy Link

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/AFL/AFL-news/e ... z3DwNCOriJ

King-Eliagh wrote:

Fred wrote:

Pfffft ... Keep trying ... The phelpsy username is still there for all to see.

It was a lesson for you from your welching of the drac bet .

I shall call you banjo from now on . Played you like the squealing pig you are :$

Is that why no one but urself has stood up in ur defence?

As for the no bet with dwac? It was basically only you and nrlcrap who assumed a bet took place. Everyone else understood if not signed and agreed and that I was actually "leaning towards the AFL on that one"

Noone's supporting ya freddy ya filthy stalking welcher, no one! Not even dwac!!!

You simply couldn't have given urself a harder uppercut

Carry on now

I'll stand by the way he played you KE. I've seen his avatar and his signature on the Phelpsy account. It's there for anyone to see. Certainly he has honoured the bet and the welcher name shouldn't be used. Next time place a minimum post count for the account and you will be set. That's what I did. You live and learn.

P.S stop your wining you sound like a little girl.

^ trolling like he's in a three billy goats gruff play.

You sound quite dumb you know pies. You should be ashamed of urself. Minimum post count indeed

King-Eliagh wrote:

^ trolling like he's in a three billy goats gruff play.

You sound quite dumb you know pies. You should be ashamed of urself. Minimum post count indeed

common pies, lift yer game champ.

remember when I used to give you moderating advice via sms's? You loved that shit, lapped it up and it really made you a respected member. And now you're supporting a convicted stalker/welcher who doesn't understand what "I'm leaning towards the AFL on this one" means in betting terms?

Lets keep it real bro, pickup yer game

piesman2011 wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

^ trolling like he's in a three billy goats gruff play.

You sound quite dumb you know pies. You should be ashamed of urself. Minimum post count indeed

Gold.

King-Eliagh wrote:

common pies, lift yer game champ.

remember when I used to give you moderating advice via sms's? You loved that shit, lapped it up and it really made you a respected member. And now you're supporting a convicted stalker/welcher who doesn't understand what "I'm leaning towards the AFL on this one" means in betting terms?

Lets keep it real bro, pickup yer game