Page 11 of 18
Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:47 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:
a bet cockhead ?
if & when you finally find your testicles
you know where I am

A one off. They had plenty of ratings in the low 20s with no concurrent foxtel ratings
ah ... no wanker
those were NRL games not involving the Storm on FTA in Melbourne
the FTA games the Storm played rated much ... much higher then that .... averaging 60K for 2013
about as well as the Swines did in Sydney with pay added
that's with both sides the defending premiers
but... after just 2 years of regular broadcasts for the Storm In Melbourne .... compared to 30 years for the Swines in Sydney
wow
just wow

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
Jeeps youre a liar
viewtopic.php?f=43&t=3759
This thread shows some of the swans ratings, without foxtel, were 65,57,70, 95....the Stom werent near this on average, let alone adding foxtel

jeeps you're a wanker

:_<> :_<> :_<>
4 above 60K
& 18 well below it ... even with pay

:_<> :_<> :_<>
& doesn't even show any Storm ratings you complete dick
when will the lies stop with fumblers

More raiderdave denial. They were the figures shown in the thread, which had nothing to do with an argument about the swans, so the sample was random.
Where are these storm ratings?
4 over fuckwit
18 under... well... under
end of

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:50 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:
a bet cockhead ?
if & when you finally find your testicles
you know where I am

A one off. They had plenty of ratings in the low 20s with no concurrent foxtel ratings
ah ... no wanker
those were NRL games not involving the Storm on FTA in Melbourne
the FTA games the Storm played rated much ... much higher then that .... averaging 60K for 2013
about as well as the Swines did in Sydney with pay added
that's with both sides the defending premiers
but... after just 2 years of regular broadcasts for the Storm In Melbourne .... compared to 30 years for the Swines in Sydney
wow
just wow

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
5th July 2013 Storm v Broncos @MediaweekAUS: Fri TV #NRL Nine 601k (Syd 354k Bri 247k) GEM 33k (
Mel 25k Ade 3k Per 6k)
Oh dear, 25k, and no foxtel simulcast! :_<>

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
one example
& you've proven you're right eh
wow
what a tool

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:53 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:
a bet cockhead ?
if & when you finally find your testicles
you know where I am

A one off. They had plenty of ratings in the low 20s with no concurrent foxtel ratings
ah ... no wanker
those were NRL games not involving the Storm on FTA in Melbourne
the FTA games the Storm played rated much ... much higher then that .... averaging 60K for 2013
about as well as the Swines did in Sydney with pay added
that's with both sides the defending premiers
but... after just 2 years of regular broadcasts for the Storm In Melbourne .... compared to 30 years for the Swines in Sydney
wow
just wow

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
5th July 2013 Storm v Broncos @MediaweekAUS: Fri TV #NRL Nine 601k (Syd 354k Bri 247k) GEM 33k (
Mel 25k Ade 3k Per 6k)
Oh dear, 25k, and no foxtel simulcast! :_<>

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
one example
& you've proven you're right eh
wow
what a tool

One more than yours. 25k. It only took one post for me to disprove you BS!

see how it works? You make a claim and I smash it. You should try it sometime
For the storm to average 60k you'll need some in the 80-90k mark now.
Where are they Dave? :_<>
Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 4:28 pm
by Xman
Fri TV #NRL #NRLMANSOU Nine 690k (Syd 429k Bri 261k) GEM 58k (Mel 40k Ade 4k Per 14k) 748
Poor poor Dave
Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:08 pm
by NRLCrap1
NRLCrap1 wrote:It didn't show any Storm ratings because they missed the cut, doofus!! It was THAT low!
You show me an average 60K rating for the Storm, and I'll take a week off here. If you can't or won't within 24 hours of this comment YOU take the week off here!
Agreed?
(This'll be good!)
Quoted for Dave to accept or reject.
Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:11 pm
by AFLcrap1
Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:59 pm
by Xman
Ahh, whoops.
Well my 25k posts stands, until Dave provides some proof anyway
Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 10:45 am
by Raiderdave
NRLCrap1 wrote:
You show me an average 60K rating for the Storm, and I'll take a week off here. If you can't or won't within 24 hours of this comment YOU take the week off here!
Agreed?
(This'll be good!)
oh shit I missed this
hmmmmm
how bout a month outa here piss flap ?
got the balls ?

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 6:21 pm
by AFLcrap1
Raiderdave wrote:NRLCrap1 wrote:
You show me an average 60K rating for the Storm, and I'll take a week off here. If you can't or won't within 24 hours of this comment YOU take the week off here!
Agreed?
(This'll be good!)
oh shit I missed this
hmmmmm
how bout a month outa here piss flap ?
got the balls ?

Closest he has to Balls is when the little lap dog sits on Masters lap.
Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 7:00 pm
by Fred
Dave bets ... Dave doesn't bet ...??? I do think its a bit rich to be calling someone names for not betting whilst refusing to take a bet yourself regarding a claim Dave made? But it's all par for the course with Dave
Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 11:13 am
by NRLCrap1
No, a week is fair. Accept. Now.
Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 5:41 pm
by Xman
NRLCrap1 wrote:No, a week is fair. Accept. Now.
Careful of the terms. Dave will pull a swiftly and include finals
Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 10:10 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:NRLCrap1 wrote:No, a week is fair. Accept. Now.
Careful of the terms. Dave will pull a swiftly and include finals
oh... Im sorry
the terms have been accepted as above

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 10:31 pm
by Raiderdave
NRLCrap1 wrote:No, a week is fair. Accept. Now.
5th July 2013 Storm v Broncos @MediaweekAUS: Fri TV #NRL Nine 601k (Syd 354k Bri 247k) GEM 33k (
Mel 25k Ade 3k Per 6k)
4th April 2013 Storm v Bulldogs @MediaweekAUS Fri TV #NRL Live: Nine 809k (Syd 447k Bri 362k) GEM 45k (
Mel 36k Ade 5k Per 3k)
Mediaweek @MediaweekAUS · Sep 21 2013
Sat TV ratings #NRLFinals Nine 960k (Syd 576k
Mel 117k Bri 267k) GEM 27k (Ade 4k Per 23k) @NRLKnights @MelbourneStorm
Mediaweek @MediaweekAUS · Sep 13
Fri TV ratings metro #NRLFinals @SSFCRABBITOHS @MelbourneStorm Nine 821k (Syd 565k Bri 256k) GEM 85k (
Mel 64k Ade 3k Per 17k)
so that's
117
64
36
25
4 FTA games for the Storm in Melbourne in 2013
242K
an average of 60,500
you can fuck off now
see ya in a week ?

Re: 40,000 Sydney Swans Members in 2014
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 10:48 pm
by King-Eliagh
BettttttteeerrrrrUP!!! Nice to see an AFL turkey keen for the bet.
I'll get in first and act as independent official adjudicator to the terms of this said bet, as per the precedent set in the Beaussie Xman case.
The bet was defined by members dave and crap1 as follows.
raiderdave wrote:the Storm are hitting around 60K when they're on FTA in Melbourne after just 2 years of regular broadcasts
crapboy wrote:You show me an average 60K rating for the Storm, and I'll take a week off here
Dave responded with
raiderdave wrote: how bout a month outa here piss flap ?
Crapboy got spooked replied with
crapboy wrote:No, a week is fair. Accept. Now
To which Dave responded with
raiderdave wrote: the terms have been accepted as above

Crap boy finished his initial quote above with ''accept the bet within 24 hours of this post''. This was posted on Feb 8 but the comment is now null and void as crapboy has shown reinterest and re initiated the bet with dave well post his initial 24 hour timeframe.
So that's it folks. Its a pretty simple one, cut and dry. Dave, balls in ur court now bro, show us an avg of 60k for the storm on their FTA and crapone either hightails it outta here or welches like a lil weeny.
May the only man win.
