Talking Footy

pHyR3 wrote:

Err, similar numbers? So 500k Melbourne = 622k Melbourne???? Yeah, just inflate your numbers by 20%. I know you need it.

It completely depends which game it was. Most of this years finals involved an interstate team so the interstate numbers would be higher. The Ess v Geelong game was Mel v Mel so of course the Melbourne figures were higher. What night was this final anyway? As the NRL finals on the weekend showed, Saturday is always less than Friday. From memory the NRL was down 300k from Friday to Saturdays finals.

i'm tired and a bit tired of so many variables and stuff xman. call it a draw?

http://www.worldofwookie.com/AFL/broadc ... k1and2.png

thoughts?

pHyR3 wrote:

i'm tired and a bit tired of so many variables and stuff xman. call it a draw?

http://www.worldofwookie.com/AFL/broadc ... k1and2.png

thoughts?

Thoughts on what?

Finals Week 1:
AFL 2013 = 4,610,000
AFL 2012 = 4,861,000

Finals Week 2:
AFL 2013 = 2,749,000
AFL 2012 = 3,063,000

pHyR3 wrote:

Finals Week 1:
AFL 2013 = 4,610,000
AFL 2012 = 4,861,000

Finals Week 2:
AFL 2013 = 2,749,000
AFL 2012 = 3,063,000

Note the overall increase of 4 - 6.6% in ratings compared to last year. Taking isolated rounds isnt an accurate reflection of growth as isolated games or finals round ratings are affected by the match ups and or the closeness of the contest. Plus from memory foxtel ratings in the finals were stronger this year.

That included foxtel?

Why wouldn't it include foxtel?

Xman wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

Finals Week 1:
AFL 2013 = 4,610,000
AFL 2012 = 4,861,000

Finals Week 2:
AFL 2013 = 2,749,000
AFL 2012 = 3,063,000

Note the overall increase of 4 - 6.6% in ratings compared to last year. Taking isolated rounds isnt an accurate reflection of growth as isolated games or finals round ratings are affected by the match ups and or the closeness of the contest. Plus from memory foxtel ratings in the finals were stronger this year.

Well, the whole finals series rated far lower than last year. Hardly an 'isolated round' it's the showpiece of the season.

pHyR3 wrote:

Xman wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

Finals Week 1:
AFL 2013 = 4,610,000
AFL 2012 = 4,861,000

Finals Week 2:
AFL 2013 = 2,749,000
AFL 2012 = 3,063,000

Note the overall increase of 4 - 6.6% in ratings compared to last year. Taking isolated rounds isnt an accurate reflection of growth as isolated games or finals round ratings are affected by the match ups and or the closeness of the contest. Plus from memory foxtel ratings in the finals were stronger this year.

Well, the whole finals series rated far lower than last year. Hardly an 'isolated round' it's the showpiece of the season.

Like i have been saying for a while now..................................................everybody seems to think that AFL tv ratings went up 30% the year simulcast came in.

30% let me repeat
30%
30%
30%

30% of viewers in the AFL markets thought they would for the first time watch AFL footy in 2011.................. :_<> :_<> :_<>


BS Simulcasts ratings................the elephant in the room that none of these singlet wearers want to talk about :_<> :_<> :_<>

And say these Simulcasts ratings are legit........................................would not the NRL get the same or similar lift once simulcast comes in?????????????

That would put NRL sso far infront the networks would have to pay a squillen dollars for the TV rights.......

eelofwest wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

Xman wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

Finals Week 1:
AFL 2013 = 4,610,000
AFL 2012 = 4,861,000

Finals Week 2:
AFL 2013 = 2,749,000
AFL 2012 = 3,063,000

Note the overall increase of 4 - 6.6% in ratings compared to last year. Taking isolated rounds isnt an accurate reflection of growth as isolated games or finals round ratings are affected by the match ups and or the closeness of the contest. Plus from memory foxtel ratings in the finals were stronger this year.

Well, the whole finals series rated far lower than last year. Hardly an 'isolated round' it's the showpiece of the season.

Like i have been saying for a while now..................................................everybody seems to think that AFL tv ratings went up 30% the year simulcast came in.

30% let me repeat
30%
30%
30%

30% of viewers in the AFL markets thought they would for the first time watch AFL footy in 2011.................. :_<> :_<> :_<>


BS Simulcasts ratings................the elephant in the room that none of these singlet wearers want to talk about :_<> :_<> :_<>

And say these Simulcasts ratings are legit........................................would not the NRL get the same or similar lift once simulcast comes in?????????????

That would put NRL sso far infront the networks would have to pay a squillen dollars for the TV rights.......

Got any figures to back this 30% increase up? The FTA ratings dropped when foxtel simulcasting began. Plus the other major factors like live footy and earlier prime time games all contributed to the increase.

pHyR3 wrote:

Xman wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

Finals Week 1:
AFL 2013 = 4,610,000
AFL 2012 = 4,861,000

Finals Week 2:
AFL 2013 = 2,749,000
AFL 2012 = 3,063,000

Note the overall increase of 4 - 6.6% in ratings compared to last year. Taking isolated rounds isnt an accurate reflection of growth as isolated games or finals round ratings are affected by the match ups and or the closeness of the contest. Plus from memory foxtel ratings in the finals were stronger this year.

Well, the whole finals series rated far lower than last year. Hardly an 'isolated round' it's the showpiece of the season.

Its a comparison to last years showpiece. This years teams and games were different. Fremantle and Prt Adelaide are the smaller of the wa and SA teams. Last year it was Adelaide and westcoast their bigger brothers, hich draw larger ratings. Collingwood made it deeper into the finals too which adds to ratings. Their also only 9 finals games, a mere snapshot of a 200 game season.

eelofwest wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

Xman wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

Finals Week 1:
AFL 2013 = 4,610,000
AFL 2012 = 4,861,000

Finals Week 2:
AFL 2013 = 2,749,000
AFL 2012 = 3,063,000

Note the overall increase of 4 - 6.6% in ratings compared to last year. Taking isolated rounds isnt an accurate reflection of growth as isolated games or finals round ratings are affected by the match ups and or the closeness of the contest. Plus from memory foxtel ratings in the finals were stronger this year.

Well, the whole finals series rated far lower than last year. Hardly an 'isolated round' it's the showpiece of the season.

Like i have been saying for a while now..................................................everybody seems to think that AFL tv ratings went up 30% the year simulcast came in.

30% let me repeat
30%
30%
30%

30% of viewers in the AFL markets thought they would for the first time watch AFL footy in 2011.................. :_<> :_<> :_<>


BS Simulcasts ratings................the elephant in the room that none of these singlet wearers want to talk about :_<> :_<> :_<>

And say these Simulcasts ratings are legit........................................would not the NRL get the same or similar lift once simulcast comes in?????????????

That would put NRL sso far infront the networks would have to pay a squillen dollars for the TV rights.......

http://www.AFL.com.au/staticfile/AFL%20 ... 12_web.pdf
would like to congratulate our television and digital media partners the Seven Network, Foxtel, Fox Sports and Telstra for the quality and extent of their coverage in 2012, which saw television audiences increase by 12 per cent.

30% hey? >

12% increase due to live games into every state starting at 7.30pm instead of 8.30-11.30pm

pHyR3 wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

First. Rep games don't count in the real world.

Okay, AFL is 30th. I'm not counting any AFL finals games because they don't count in the real world.
=D> =D> =D> =D>

Oh dear, what have you got against the clubs? You're putting a three times a year non club match up above club games? You've got issues if you do that my friend. Finals count because they involve the most important part of a competition. The clubs. Without clubs you wouldn't even have SOO!!

NRLCrap1 wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

First. Rep games don't count in the real world.

Okay, AFL is 30th. I'm not counting any AFL finals games because they don't count in the real world.
=D> =D> =D> =D>

Oh dear, what have you got against the clubs? You're putting a three times a year non club match up above club games? You've got issues if you do that my friend. Finals count because they involve the most important part of a competition. The clubs. Without clubs you wouldn't even have SOO!!

:_<> :_<>

whaaaaaaaaaa

our cwubs are the only thing that matters


yeah
because that's all you've got dickhead

our wonderful sport has this too
&

so


so much more
including this nations biggest sporting series

what a drab little code the fumbles n bumbles is

Nrl has average of 16000 doesn't it ?