Jon Anderson, Jon Ralph
From: Herald Sun
January 29, 2013 7:46PM
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Drug test
AFL players are saving themselves from drug tests when they believe they are in danger of being tested by self-reporting to the AFL. Supplied
CLUBS believe some players have activated the self-reporting loophole in the AFL's illicit drugs code when alerted to the presence of a tester.
Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.
Recommended Coverage
Crash course: AFL drugs policy
End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.
Access all Areas. $1 for the first 28 days. Only $2.95 a week thereafter. Learn more.
A number of high-ranking club officials yesterday said they had been told players who become aware of a possible imminent test could immediately call AFL medicos to confess recent drug use.
The Herald Sun has reported that Collingwood players are among those to have confessed to drug use and dodged drug tests in the following days.
The Illicit Drugs Policy states: "A player may refer himself to the AFL Medical Officer for testing, education, counselling or treatment at any time. A player shall not be deemed to have recorded a positive test if he refers himself for such treatment prior to submitting a sample that subsequently returns a positive result."
The self-reporting loophole will be tightened today, with AFL clubs to also push for more information after a second positive drug strike.
But the AFL player union will resist, believing if club chief executives are told it raises the possibility of a player's confidentiality being breached.
The AFLPA said under the letter of the law players should not be able to self-report if the aim is to avoid an imminent positive test.
The player union said if drug testers were aware of that motive, a test would be conducted and a strike recorded if a positive result was found.
One club is believed to have had 10 incidences of six players self-reporting in 2012, with one putting his hand up three times in that period.
Critics argue those figures show players are taking advantage of the three-strikes system.
Sources say players especially those fearing they have drugs in their system are increasingly aware of the presence of drug testers which can lead to self-reporting.
Former West Coast and Richmond star Ben Cousins is known to have dodged drug tests after being alerted to the presence of testers by players already at the club.
Players who self-report are target-tested in future months, but for a player on two strikes future testing is clearly a risk worth taking.
AFLPA chief executive Matt Finnis said the policy had only recently been abused by players.
"In that very example, the player would have to do that drug test and he would be bound by any result that came from that but the policy has contained a provision which is there for a player who has used drugs, has an issue with drugs, to be able to put his hand up and seek help," he told SEN.
"That's because the nature of the policy is helping people to make change when they have made a mistake. If a player notifies, he then is able to get that assistance, be diverted into relevant programs and had he returned a subsequent policy he wouldn't be burdened with that on the basis that he's put his hand up to seek help."
One official said the policy was routinely abused.
"It can be an excuse as lame as 'my drink was spiked last night and I may have inadvertently taken drugs'," one club executive said.
"It means a player holds a Joker if he is on two strikes, a get-out-of-jail free card."
"Most players have reached a stage where they don't particularly care about one strike with some even prepared to roll the dice when on two strikes."
Confessed drug addict Cousins said he was often tipped off by teammates about the appearance of drug testers and simply failed to attend training to avoid positive tests.
Drug addicts the lot of them..........
