BS Claim#2: The RFL alone is bigger than all the AFL....

[NSWAFL]

That's all of them, I went through every link.

No you didn't. There are more comps than that. You just refuse to acknowledge that 60 countries play our great game, simply because you won't admit that Wikipedia, Facebook and Aussie Rules International as sources. Your mistake.

if NSWAFL can provide the 17 clubs from NZ, I'll put it up to 171 clubs in 19 nations.

That's what it is. I gave the links and you ignored them as usual

I also need seniors clubs for PNG and South Africa, that'll be 21 nations all up.

And the rest, Parra. Admit it. You're done. And even with 171, there's no way the UK has 8,550 RL clubs! (171 x 50)

Edit;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_West ... all_League
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauteng_Pr ... all_League
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian ... mpetitions
http://www.AFL-png.com/aflpng_news_story24.html

[King-Eliagh]

That's all of them, I went through every link.

No you didn't.

You have a some hide on you dont you. You provided links full of porn which you found were potentially riddled with viruses you lil bitch. You need to shut your mouth, keep your virus ridden wanking material to yourself and never provide links again on this site. Noone will be brave enough to check them again so essentially every link you use to support your claims from now on are potential steaming piles of virus ridden BS.

Xman, I'd like to know the viability of posting a BS claim against many of the links NSWAFL provided. They're clearcut steaming BS right?

I cant believe there has been no action taken against him, not even a slap on the wrist for spreading potentially harmful links on this site, so Xman I foresee your action as defensive and protective of your littlest AFL wanking fan.

Just as Parra said, the BS files - good concept, poorly adjudicated. Therefore it will die pretty soon. Unless some sort of objective opinion is expressed by Xman in this thread, I'll seeyas back in the fightclub.

Cheerio.

[Xman]

That's all of them, I went through every link.

No you didn't.

You have a some hide on you dont you. You provided links full of porn which you found were potentially riddled with viruses you lil bitch. You need to shut your mouth, keep your virus ridden wanking material to yourself and never provide links again on this site. Noone will be brave enough to check them again so essentially every link you use to support your claims from now on are potential steaming piles of virus ridden BS.

Xman, I'd like to know the viability of posting a BS claim against many of the links NSWAFL provided. They're clearcut steaming BS right?

I cant believe there has been no action taken against him, not even a slap on the wrist for spreading potentially harmful links on this site, so Xman I foresee your action as defensive and protective of your littlest AFL wanking fan.

Just as Parra said, the BS files - good concept, poorly adjudicated. Therefore it will die pretty soon. Unless some sort of objective opinion is expressed by Xman in this thread, I'll seeyas back in the fightclub.

Cheerio.

I'm not sure how providing a link that proves to be corrupt qualifies as a BS file.

How many links lead to porn sites or viruses exactly?

I've warned you before about discussing moderator issues and/or decisions on the public boards. Pm me and I'm happy to discuss it. Next time the entire post will be deleted and I will consider taking it further. It's not accepted on other sites, nor here.

The adjudication of the BS file claims is still yet to be performed. All I have done so far is make comments which I hope give the claimant and challenges some ideas of how their cases are progressing, and my impressions so far. I am still open to the contributions of a RL fan in the final decision process. Unfortunately none have offered their services. The offer still remains though.

Regards this claim I am happy for either side to win. But if Parra claims a particular measurable comparison of both codes he needs to show evidence for both codes that confirms his claim. Has he done this to your knowledge?

[King-Eliagh]

I've offered to assist with adjudication but was ignored.

IMO nswafl has no hope of winning this file. Firstly his only argument is amassing the number of aussie rules clubs around the world. He's done this through links, several of which which appear virus ridden. His argument is that the 'amount' of clubs constitutes that international aussie rules is 'bigger'. By his argument soccer is much bigger than aussie rules in Australia.

I think if parra finds a way to highlight that financially the RFL or whatever its name is, is bigger than the other put together then he wins bestest and smartest. Given his analysis of nswafl's websites, he's clearly got this one in the bag. Blind freddy can see it.

[Xman]

I've offered to assist with adjudication but was ignored.

IMO nswafl has no hope of winning this file. Firstly his only argument is amassing the number of aussie rules clubs around the world. He's done this through links, several of which which appear virus ridden. His argument is that the 'amount' of clubs constitutes that international aussie rules is 'bigger'. By his argument soccer is much bigger than aussie rules in Australia.

I think if parra finds a way to highlight that financially the RFL or whatever its name is, is bigger than the other put together then he wins bestest and smartest. Given his analysis of nswafl's websites, he's clearly got this one in the bag. Blind freddy can see it.

NSWAFL doesnt have to prove anything. He just has to disprove Parras proof or claim.

So far Parra has provided data for RL only. How is this sufficient to prove his original claim? For example I cannot claim and prove I am taller than you by 20cms if I do not provide evidence of both our heights!

[King-Eliagh]

Ah yes the difficulties of proving stuff on the internet. At some point I think you just have to take a stance on these things. To me, Parra's evidence is 50 times better than wankboy nsw's.

Nsw has gone nowhere in proving anything is bigger, he's just listed some comps, mixed in with porn and viruses. He's made a mockery of the site and gotten off scott free. Or he didnt even check his own links the silly BS artist.

[Xman]

Ah yes the difficulties of proving stuff on the internet. At some point I think you just have to take a stance on these things. To me, Parra's evidence is 50 times better than wankboy nsw's.

Nsw has gone nowhere in proving anything is bigger, he's just listed some comps, mixed in with porn and viruses. He's made a mockery of the site and gotten off scott free. Or he didnt even check his own links the silly BS artist.

Youre missing the point. Parra made the claim. He needs to prove it. He hasn't because he hasnt quantified international AFL in any way.

I've sent you a pm.

[NSWAFL]

You have a some hide on you dont you. You provided links full of porn which you found were potentially riddled with viruses you lil bitch.

Sooky Sooky La La!

It was one link and one link only and you know it!

[cos789]

South Africa, mentions no senior teams and only talks about footywild.'

http://www.aflsouthafrica.org/index.php ... ges&view=1

You didn't try very hard did you parafeel!
Now go to my new thread on the RSA.
cheers .

[cos789]

Switzerland

http://google.dodo.com.au/search.html?q ... erland.com

This site just comes up with links to facesbook, littlepommygirl.wordpress.com/tag/aussie-rules/ and so on.

Strike this one off the list as well.

Go to my thread about Switzerland parafeel and you will find the information about AFCs.
Just because you cannot find anything doesn't mean anything.

[NSWAFL]

The burial continues. Parra is heading for a BS point if he doesn't prove that there are either 3000 comps or at least 8550 clubs in the UK. King's reference to money is irrelevant, because this is about numbers of clubs and comps. That is the context in which I made the challenge, and it is the way the size of sports are judged. Nothing else counts because if someone has money they can make a local tiddley winks comp look big.

[King-Eliagh]

The burial continues. Parra is heading for a BS point if he doesn't prove that there are either 3000 comps or at least 8550 clubs in the UK. King's reference to money is irrelevant, because this is about numbers of clubs and comps. That is the context in which I made the challenge, and it is the way the size of sports are judged. Nothing else counts because if someone has money they can make a local tiddley winks comp look big.

[NSWAFL]

Can't counter that, King? Maybe I should start calling you Dunce from now then.

[ParraEelsNRL]

I already put the info about the RFL in here at the beginning of the thread you ******.

Player numbers, Clubs, sponsorship, TV rights, I linked up one part to Sports England who look over all sports played in the country.

I haven't even bothered to post crowds because the Hull derby alone would have a bigger crowd for that 1 game played at Hull FCs stadium than all the world AFL comps outside Australia combined for the whole year.

Where are your crowds, sponsorships, TV rights, radio rights or anything NSWAFL?

Where are they?

You have posted shiit, you have the hide to say I don't post links, yet I have absolutely humiliated you in this thread, you put facebook and wiki in and expect everyone to see the link and not click on them because we are supposed to take your word for it, well I clicked on all the links and there was some sorry shiit going on in a lot of them.

From viruses to asian porn movies. Wake The Fk up!

[ParraEelsNRL]

Here's some more RL clubs from the UK.

RLC National

Bramley Buffaloes
Carlisle
Dewsbury Celtic
Featherstone Lions
Hemel Stags
Huddersfield Underbank Rangers
Kippax Knights
Liverpool Buccaneers
Nottingham Outlaws
Warrington Wizards

Midlands Premier

Birmingham Bulldogs
Gloucestershire Warriors
Leicester Storm
Coventry Bears
Derby City
Bristol Sonics

Yorkshire Premier

East Leeds
Haworth Park
Milford Marlins
Moorend Thorne
Rotherham Giants
Scarborough Pirates
York Lokomotive

North West Premier

Lymm
New Broughton Rangers
Runcorn
Widnes Saints
Wigan Riversiders

Wales Premier

Blackwood Bulldogs
Bridgend Blue Bulls
Cardiff Demons
CPC Bears
Newport Titans
Valley Cougars

Premier South

Eastern Rhinos
Hainault Bulldogs
Hammersmith Hill Hoists
London Skolars
Portsmouth Navy Seahawks
South London Storm
St Albans Centurions
West London Sharks

Womens South

Northampton Demons Ladies
Nottingham Outlaws
Coventry Bears
West London Sharks Women
Womens East

Keighley Cats
Whinmoor
Leeds Akkies
Brighouse Ladies
Stanningley Ladies
Guisley
Womens West

Warrington
Wigan Ladies
Halton
Chorley Panthers

Midlands Regional

Birmingham Bulldogs 'A'
Coventry Bears 'A'
Leamington Royals
North East Worcestershire Ravens
Nottingham Outlaws 'A'
Telford Raiders

Yorkshire Regional

Barnsley Broncos
Bradford Victoria Rangers
Leeds Akkies
Lincoln City Knights
Parkside Hawks
Scunthorpe Barbarians
Wetherby Bulldogs
Shaw Cross Sharks

North West Regional

Crewe & Nantwich Steamers
Chester Gladiators
Wigan Riversiders 'A'
Mancunians RL
Blackpool Sea Eagles

Wales Regional

Amman Valley Rhinos
Merthyr Wildcats
Neath Port Talbot Steelers
Dinefwr Sharks
Torfaen Tigers
West Wales Wild Boars

South West Regional

South Dorset Giants
Plymouth Titans
East Devon Eagles
Devon Sharks
Exeter Centurions
Somerset Vikings
North Devon Raiders
South Somerset Warriors

South East Regional

Sussex Merlins
Oxford Cavaliers
Swindon St George
Greenwich Admirals
South London Storm 'A'
Elmbridge Eagles
Guildford Giants
Southampton Spitfires

East Regional

Bury Titans
St Albans Centurions 'A'
Bedford Tigers
Northampton Demons
Norwich City Saxons
St Ives Roosters

North East Regional

Northallerton Stallions
Cramlington Rockets
Sunderland Nissan
Newcastle Storm
Jarrow Vikings
Peterlee Pumas
Durham Demons
Wallsend Eagles
Whitley Bay Barbarians
Winlaton Warriors

Scotland Regional

Ayrshire
Kirkcaldy
Easterhouse Panthers
Carluke Tigers
Edinburgh Eagles
Fife Lions
Falkirk
Moray Eels

That's 123 clubs there alone.