Talking Footy

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Sun Mar 02, 2025 5:35 pm

you can have a 70 sponsors or 50 sponsors ... it all depends how much each sponsor Pays what matters..
and with the NRL having bigger tv ratings and more subs i would assume it would only benefit the NRL

v 30% greater reach audience, more matches, massively greater finals viewing, more breaks, and more viewers for magazine shows on average

ratings arent everything despite league fans desperately throwing them around like they are holy writ. And subs has never been substantiated.

WookieReturns wrote: Sun Mar 02, 2025 10:41 pm

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Sun Mar 02, 2025 5:35 pm

you can have a 70 sponsors or 50 sponsors ... it all depends how much each sponsor Pays what matters..
and with the NRL having bigger tv ratings and more subs i would assume it would only benefit the NRL

v 30% greater reach audience, more matches, massively greater finals viewing, more breaks, and more viewers for magazine shows on average

ratings arent everything despite league fans desperately throwing them around like they are holy writ. And subs has never been substantiated.

but but but



200.5 million

to

148 million

with less games


its not a contest

WookieReturns wrote: Sun Mar 02, 2025 10:41 pm

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Sun Mar 02, 2025 5:35 pm

you can have a 70 sponsors or 50 sponsors ... it all depends how much each sponsor Pays what matters..
and with the NRL having bigger tv ratings and more subs i would assume it would only benefit the NRL

v 30% greater reach audience, more matches, massively greater finals viewing, more breaks, and more viewers for magazine shows on average

ratings arent everything despite league fans desperately throwing them around like they are holy writ. And subs has never been substantiated.

Is this why AFL gets so much more in TV rights?

Fred wrote: Mon Mar 03, 2025 12:09 pm

WookieReturns wrote: Sun Mar 02, 2025 10:41 pm

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Sun Mar 02, 2025 5:35 pm

you can have a 70 sponsors or 50 sponsors ... it all depends how much each sponsor Pays what matters..
and with the NRL having bigger tv ratings and more subs i would assume it would only benefit the NRL

v 30% greater reach audience, more matches, massively greater finals viewing, more breaks, and more viewers for magazine shows on average

ratings arent everything despite league fans desperately throwing them around like they are holy writ. And subs has never been substantiated.

Is this why AFL gets so much more in TV rights?

they won't for long
then what will the excuses be ?

I wonder if the NRL can include a phone company wiring a stadiums wifii as Media rights income too ?

azif wrote: Mon Mar 03, 2025 12:31 pm

I wonder if the NRL can include a phone company wiring a stadiums wifii as Media rights income too ?

fuck and you think we go on about "but buts"

Sure and then the AFL can include its radio rights too, where they are included in the NRL deal

they include it as sponsorship revenue instead. Aalmost literally the same deal.

azif wrote: Mon Mar 03, 2025 12:29 pm

they won't for long

Thats FAR from assured.

then what will the excuses be ?

it will be things like

- deal starting 3 years after the AFL one with attendant inflation and changing conditions
- deal negotiated 4 years after the AFL one with attendant changes in conditions.

With the above, and new teams and a post 2031 end date, it better be higher. But then who knows Vlandys might pull the "think of the broadcastsd" bullshit again

WookieReturns wrote: Wed Mar 05, 2025 2:48 pm

azif wrote: Mon Mar 03, 2025 12:31 pm

I wonder if the NRL can include a phone company wiring a stadiums wifii as Media rights income too ?

fuck and you think we go on about "but buts"

Sure and then the AFL can include its radio rights too, where they are included in the NRL deal

they include it as sponsorship revenue instead. Aalmost literally the same deal.

radio is media you stupid twat

a phone company isn't

WookieReturns wrote: Sun Mar 02, 2025 10:41 pm

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Sun Mar 02, 2025 5:35 pm

you can have a 70 sponsors or 50 sponsors ... it all depends how much each sponsor Pays what matters..
and with the NRL having bigger tv ratings and more subs i would assume it would only benefit the NRL

v 30% greater reach audience, more matches, massively greater finals viewing, more breaks, and more viewers for magazine shows on average

ratings arent everything despite league fans desperately throwing them around like they are holy writ. And subs has never been substantiated.

its AFL's NEW TV DEAL

Now when it's NRL's Turn and they get more than the AFL Tv Deal. (in 6 months) equal it at worse.

the true value will be submitted

also locking in something 7 years to 5 years. is worth more to the broadcaster to pay more.
(gives them guarantee for longer)

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Wed Mar 05, 2025 3:47 pm

its AFL's NEW TV DEAL

Its the AFLs new MEDIA deal. Not just television.

azif wrote: Wed Mar 05, 2025 2:57 pm

radio is media you stupid twat

a phone company isn't

Not really my point. Radio rights arent part of the AFL rights announcement. They are for the NRL (as part of Nine media)

Phone company that hold media, highlights and replay rights for the AFL and its website network. But you keep believing what you want.

WookieReturns wrote: Wed Mar 05, 2025 10:13 pm

azif wrote: Wed Mar 05, 2025 2:57 pm

radio is media you stupid twat

a phone company isn't

Not really my point. Radio rights arent part of the AFL rights announcement. They are for the NRL (as part of Nine media)

Phone company that hold media, highlights and replay rights for the AFL and its website network. But you keep believing what you want.

but but but
what next.. paint the toilets & include that ?

azif wrote: Thu Mar 06, 2025 6:41 am

but but but
what next.. paint the toilets & include that ?

whats next is people like you actually finding out shit before you talk.

WookieReturns wrote: Thu Mar 06, 2025 3:43 pm

azif wrote: Thu Mar 06, 2025 6:41 am

but but but
what next.. paint the toilets & include that ?

whats next is people like you actually finding out shit before you talk.

your shit ?
no thanks , ill get the facts from a reputable source ..

azif wrote: Thu Mar 06, 2025 3:49 pm

your shit ?
no thanks , ill get the facts from a reputable source ..

yeah its almost like i dont post links to the original source with my material. That you then willfully misunderstand.