Talking Footy

AFLcrap1 wrote: Sat Feb 23, 2019 7:10 pm

See how it goes up against another popular sport
It had clear air on FTA.

Still can’t acknowledge it was a good night for the AFL, broadcasters and sponsors can you?

Nope
Anything can look good when they have no competition .

AFLcrap1 wrote: Sun Feb 24, 2019 12:32 am

NlolRL wrote: Sat Feb 23, 2019 8:01 pm

AFLcrap1 wrote: Sat Feb 23, 2019 7:10 pm

See how it goes up against another popular sport
It had clear air on FTA.

See how the rl would rate if broadcast at 4pm on a friday in brisbane

Lol
That's one states ratings .
You're carrying on like alevery state had it broadcast at 4.

No, perth is our second largest market like Brisbane is yours

NlolRL wrote: Sun Feb 24, 2019 10:32 am

AFLcrap1 wrote: Sun Feb 24, 2019 12:32 am

NlolRL wrote: Sat Feb 23, 2019 8:01 pm

See how the rl would rate if broadcast at 4pm on a friday in brisbane

Lol
That's one states ratings .
You're carrying on like alevery state had it broadcast at 4.

No, perth is our second largest market like Brisbane is yours

yes, but how much would it really have rated extra if it were at 7pm...

ADELAIDE rated 66k

now for AFL ratings they are usally neck and neck.. (lets just say it rated 80k)

does this help your cause..

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Feb 25, 2019 9:52 am

NlolRL wrote: Sun Feb 24, 2019 10:32 am

AFLcrap1 wrote: Sun Feb 24, 2019 12:32 am

Lol
That's one states ratings .
You're carrying on like alevery state had it broadcast at 4.

No, perth is our second largest market like Brisbane is yours

yes, but how much would it really have rated extra if it were at 7pm...

ADELAIDE rated 66k

now for AFL ratings they are usally neck and neck.. (lets just say it rated 80k)

does this help your cause..

it only rated about 20k. It could have been 50k more

NlolRL wrote: Mon Feb 25, 2019 9:57 am

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Feb 25, 2019 9:52 am

NlolRL wrote: Sun Feb 24, 2019 10:32 am

No, perth is our second largest market like Brisbane is yours

yes, but how much would it really have rated extra if it were at 7pm...

ADELAIDE rated 66k

now for AFL ratings they are usally neck and neck.. (lets just say it rated 80k)

does this help your cause..

it only rated about 20k. It could have been 50k more

yes i know it only rated 20k....

i even gave you the benefit of the doubt that it could of rated as high as 80k...

my point is.. what are you trying to proove..

even if it did rate 30k more as you have stated .. what does this do?

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Feb 25, 2019 11:01 am

NlolRL wrote: Mon Feb 25, 2019 9:57 am

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Feb 25, 2019 9:52 am

yes, but how much would it really have rated extra if it were at 7pm...

ADELAIDE rated 66k

now for AFL ratings they are usally neck and neck.. (lets just say it rated 80k)

does this help your cause..

it only rated about 20k. It could have been 50k more

yes i know it only rated 20k....

i even gave you the benefit of the doubt that it could of rated as high as 80k...

my point is.. what are you trying to proove..

even if it did rate 30k more as you have stated .. what does this do?

It lost marginally but would have rated around 60k more if it was prime time nation-wide.

However, I'm not trying to say AFLx is popular, it's just more popular than the RL folk on here will want to admit

NlolRL wrote: Mon Feb 25, 2019 11:12 am

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Feb 25, 2019 11:01 am

NlolRL wrote: Mon Feb 25, 2019 9:57 am

it only rated about 20k. It could have been 50k more

yes i know it only rated 20k....

i even gave you the benefit of the doubt that it could of rated as high as 80k...

my point is.. what are you trying to proove..

even if it did rate 30k more as you have stated .. what does this do?

It lost marginally but would have rated around 60k more if it was prime time nation-wide.

However, I'm not trying to say AFLx is popular, it's just more popular than the RL folk on here will want to admit

Fair Enough, Popularity of a product is seen after numerous games...

Be interesting to see if AFL will go with it again..

I think they will, but will make some slight changes.

AFL to be Beamed into LIVE into QLD on Channel 7

(funny fact Queenslanders will see more FTA games of AFL QLD teams than NRL QLD teams on FTA

Brisbane Lions thrilled with more TV exposure on Channel 7’s main channel

Queensland footy fans are no longer being treated like broadcast pariahs with a major increase in Lions and Suns games to be shown on Seven’s main channel this year

Surprisingly the Suns, who are tipped to be again around the bottom of the ladder, will enjoy an even greater increase in exposure in southeast Queensland with nine games on Seven’s primary channel.

However, they do not have a single match broadcast on free-to-air TV nationally

https://www.news.com.au/sport/AFL/brisb ... 23b8bf59a3

So, will the ratings be higher than last year given the change to the primary channel?

Lol,
Desperation time .

How? My prediction is the ratings will be higher. If my theory is correct. If not i need to concede i was wrong

I'm talking about the AFL & ch 7

I hope they are running a pre game " how to use a remote" class.
Should help a bit .

Doesn't channel seven control the channel they use to broadcast? If not they wouldnt deliberately choose 7mate.

Im willing to admit im wrong if the ratings dont change from last year. Are you willing to concede if they're better?

If the teams improve on field their ratings might improve .
But if they stay tethesame I can't see the ratings being much different