Talking Footy

Nrlolol wrote: Sat Jan 19, 2019 5:47 pm

573D8599-8EE6-4533-8B5B-675CA8536C8B.png
https://www.clearinghouseforsport.gov.a ... ults/state

Oh dear, no mention of Rugby League at all. Hang on a sec, aren’t we always being told by RL fans their game is really popular?

Lol Bea shows up to support the dumbest poster in TFC history .

Go re read what's has been posted .
Go re read the same threads started each year .

SportCapital wrote: Sun Jan 20, 2019 10:37 am

King-Eliagh wrote: Sun Jan 20, 2019 8:46 am

SportCapital wrote: Sun Jan 20, 2019 7:53 am

Did you miss the tables.
It's already provided growth.

Growth is good ke.
I understand your unfamiliarity with the concept.

Yes I missed the tables which show aflx has provided growth. Please, show us all how grown up you are and provide them for me dear sport ol chap.

...”masterstroke”

Australian football up 5.1%.
Encompassing all forms of the sport ke.
Real growth, puzzling for you I'm sure...
I can't tell you how many short form, square pitch leagues there are in the sport capital these days.
It seems every decent patch of grass is getting proper goal posts.
There's even indoor now.
Can you believe it......

I know....

I'm really annoyed I didn't invest significantly into these goal post companies.
#BoomTownBusiness

Lol still ignoring KEs request .
As for your 5.1% growth .,all forms of the sport .
Lol,it's funny when RL includes the same& have more participation numbers you fumblers have a meltdown .
You can't include that
You can't include that.


As I've said & I can't find any fumbler to agree
All participation numbers are bullshit .

Lol except when it involves AFL numbers .

& you lot wonder why you get laughed at .
Reality..common sense..practicality ..all go out the window when discussing abortionball .

AFLcrap1 wrote: Sat Jan 19, 2019 7:10 pm

Lol

Sure they do .
With their dodgy numbers .
Go re read Lawson . He highlighted the bullshit
Sorry my mistake .....you try to read but can't comprehend anything .

The stats from ABS, Reass and Roy Morgan all shows is far more popular with participation numbers!

Then of course it’s all bs to You isn’t it as it has league trailing but a long way

Still ignoring where I've posted that all participation numbers are bullshit
Get help
You're a mental case
You just repeat the same shit over & over & over .
Youncant comprehend anything posted .
So you just rant

AFLcrap1 wrote: Sun Jan 20, 2019 2:51 pm

Still ignoring where I've posted that all participation numbers are bullshit
Get help
You're a mental case
You just repeat the same shit over & over & over .
Youncant comprehend anything posted .
So you just rant

I’m not saying the numbers are exact but the common theme is the AFL flogs league in all of them!

Except the nrls own figures

That’s why you call em bs!

Pick the common theme
Easily more people play AFL over league including touch numbers

Lol
Yes you are saying that .

You've started thread after thread
Posted this same shit over & over .
OCD much ..lol

You get shown up time after time after time .

Have a metho or two .
It's not like you can damage your brain

And a new lot of stats came out and just posting it!
Only to continuously prove my points about AFL being far more popular than league

And old crapper is triggered and in denial

No rebuttal just insults

Nrlolol wrote: Sun Jan 20, 2019 2:58 pm

AFLcrap1 wrote: Sun Jan 20, 2019 2:51 pm

Still ignoring where I've posted that all participation numbers are bullshit
Get help
You're a mental case
You just repeat the same shit over & over & over .
Youncant comprehend anything posted .
So you just rant

I’m not saying the numbers are exact but the common theme is the AFL flogs league in all of them!

Except the nrls own figures

That’s why you call em bs!

Pick the common theme
Easily more people play AFL over league including touch numbers

Ok: now for the facts. In the 2017 AFL annual report they stated they had 1.54M total domestic 'participants'. The NRL report stated they had 800k RL players. The Touch reported said they had 700k registered players and 500k in school programs and related activities.

So that's AFL 1.54M V RL/Touch 2M. So your comment, 'Easily more people play AFL over league including touch numbers' is wrong!!!! You must do research ya poor buggar lest you continually look stupid!!!!

In any case all sane people know that 'participant' numbers put out by all sporting codes are dubious at best. You of course must remember that beautifully crafted expose' of AFL BS named the Lawson Report. It made for beautiful reading.

Now as I stated...…... 'sane' people rightly question all sports 'participation' numbers. I don't expect this statement will apply to you my friend.

Lol
Hold on Terry

When this comes up every year & the fumblers get schooled
Suddenly we are not allowed to include NRL touch as it gives Rl the win in the BULLSHIT PARTICIPATION STAKES .

Yet they can't wait to include Ausfumble .
Lol
Every year the same crap .
Every year the same smashing .

Yep. And on this occasion our little friend clearly stated, "Easily more people play AFL over league including touch numbers." So now that I have comprehensively refuted and smashed this statement with facts & evidence I suspect we will shortly be going back into the dreaded goldfish bowl lolololololololol.

The butt hurt continues!

Why does in all other collection of data
This one, erras, abc, Roy Morgan etc exact playing numbers aside show AFL is far more popular than league!

Yet only in RLs annual report show league has more participants!
It’s more a case of league usualing their

It's like spam .
Over & over & over .

Due to you lot still in denial
All collection of stats shows AFL far more popular and you lot are still triggered in denial about it