Talking Footy

Terry wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:03 pm

It's not just the question my friend. It also depends on who commissions the poll - there could be an agenda involved. And most importantly in this case who and how many people did they "snap SMS". They claim they got answers from around 1,600 ppl but how many did they actually SMS? 10,000, 20,000, 30,000? I mean who actually replies to a 'snap SMS survey'?

Too many variables my friend to take seriously.

leagueiscrap wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:12 pm

Terry wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:03 pm

It's not just the question my friend. It also depends on who commissions the poll - there could be an agenda involved. And most importantly in this case who and how many people did they "snap SMS". They claim they got answers from around 1,600 ppl but how many did they actually SMS? 10,000, 20,000, 30,000? I mean who actually replies to a 'snap SMS survey'?

Too many variables my friend to take seriously.

If they interviewed 30k people it’s still 25k more than rating boxes that you fruit loops hinge your life around

Terry wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:03 pm

It's not just the question my friend. It also depends on who commissions the poll - there could be an agenda involved. And most importantly in this case who and how many people did they "snap SMS". They claim they got answers from around 1,600 ppl but how many did they actually SMS? 10,000, 20,000, 30,000? I mean who actually replies to a 'snap SMS survey'?

Too many variables my friend to take seriously.

NlolRL wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:27 pm

Terry wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:03 pm

It's not just the question my friend. It also depends on who commissions the poll - there could be an agenda involved. And most importantly in this case who and how many people did they "snap SMS". They claim they got answers from around 1,600 ppl but how many did they actually SMS? 10,000, 20,000, 30,000? I mean who actually replies to a 'snap SMS survey'?

Too many variables my friend to take seriously.

I can see why you dont take it seriously

They received 44% responses saying they watched the AFL

NlolRL wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2017 7:00 pm

http://www.roymorgan.com/findings/7362- ... 1710032246

A Roy Morgan Snap SMS survey taken on Sunday showed 8.4 million Australians aged 18+ (44.5%) watched the AFL Grand Final much higher than suggested by the official Channel 7 ‘5 City Metro’ ratings of 2.7 million.

A further Roy Morgan Snap SMS survey taken on Monday showed 6.5 million Australians aged 18+ (34.5%) watched the NRL Grand Final again much higher than suggested by the official Channel 9 ‘5 City Metro’ ratings of 2.3 million.

“The different time slots for the games also skewed the method used to watch the games. The Saturday afternoon ‘timeslot’ of the AFL Grand Final drew bigger audiences at pubs and hotels and watching at friend’s houses compared to the NRL Grand Final held in the evening.

“Streaming the Saturday afternoon AFL Grand Final via an app or website was more likely for Metro area viewers (81,000) than those in the rest of Australia (18,000). The situation was reversed for the night-time NRL decider with more rural and regional viewers (57,000) of the NRL Grand Final streaming via an app or website compared to their ‘5 City Metro’ area counterparts (37,000).

“Interestingly, despite the larger audience of the AFL Grand Final than the NRL Grand Final – this difference was entirely a result of larger audiences in Australia’s five largest ‘Capital Cities’. There was little difference in the total viewers in the rest of Australia between the two matches with Roy Morgan showing the NRL Grand Final had a higher number of TV viewers outside the ‘5 City Metro’ area than the AFL Grand Final.”

pussycat wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:58 pm

NlolRL wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2017 7:00 pm

http://www.roymorgan.com/findings/7362- ... 1710032246

A Roy Morgan Snap SMS survey taken on Sunday showed 8.4 million Australians aged 18+ (44.5%) watched the AFL Grand Final much higher than suggested by the official Channel 7 ‘5 City Metro’ ratings of 2.7 million.

A further Roy Morgan Snap SMS survey taken on Monday showed 6.5 million Australians aged 18+ (34.5%) watched the NRL Grand Final again much higher than suggested by the official Channel 9 ‘5 City Metro’ ratings of 2.3 million.

“The different time slots for the games also skewed the method used to watch the games. The Saturday afternoon ‘timeslot’ of the AFL Grand Final drew bigger audiences at pubs and hotels and watching at friend’s houses compared to the NRL Grand Final held in the evening.

“Streaming the Saturday afternoon AFL Grand Final via an app or website was more likely for Metro area viewers (81,000) than those in the rest of Australia (18,000). The situation was reversed for the night-time NRL decider with more rural and regional viewers (57,000) of the NRL Grand Final streaming via an app or website compared to their ‘5 City Metro’ area counterparts (37,000).

“Interestingly, despite the larger audience of the AFL Grand Final than the NRL Grand Final – this difference was entirely a result of larger audiences in Australia’s five largest ‘Capital Cities’. There was little difference in the total viewers in the rest of Australia between the two matches with Roy Morgan showing the NRL Grand Final had a higher number of TV viewers outside the ‘5 City Metro’ area than the AFL Grand Final.”

“Interestingly, despite the larger audience of the AFL Grand Final than the NRL Grand Final – this difference was entirely a result of larger audiences in Australia’s five largest ‘Capital Cities’. There was little difference in the total viewers in the rest of Australia between the two matches with Roy Morgan showing the NRL Grand Final had a higher number of TV viewers outside the ‘5 City Metro’ area than the AFL Grand Final.” So what did the survey tell us?

leagueiscrap wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:12 pm

Terry wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:03 pm

It's not just the question my friend. It also depends on who commissions the poll - there could be an agenda involved. And most importantly in this case who and how many people did they "snap SMS". They claim they got answers from around 1,600 ppl but how many did they actually SMS? 10,000, 20,000, 30,000? I mean who actually replies to a 'snap SMS survey'?

Too many variables my friend to take seriously.

If they interviewed 30k people it’s still 25k more than rating boxes that you fruit loops hinge your life around

pussycat wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2017 10:03 pm

Not the cities - the 5 cities (metro). When he surveyed all of Australia eg. Wollongong, Newcastle. Canberra, Illawarra etc. He found pretty much what Oztam found.. There was very little difference.

NlolRL wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2017 10:40 pm

pussycat wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2017 10:03 pm

Not the cities - the 5 cities (metro). When he surveyed all of Australia eg. Wollongong, Newcastle. Canberra, Illawarra etc. He found pretty much what Oztam found.. There was very little difference.

wrong. He said the AFL smashed it in the cities, but the regional markets were better for the NRL
“Interestingly, despite the larger audience of the AFL Grand Final than the NRL Grand Final – this difference was entirely a result of larger audiences in Australia’s five largest ‘Capital Cities’. There was little difference in the total viewers in the rest of Australia between the two matches with Roy Morgan showing the NRL Grand Final had a higher number of TV viewers outside the ‘5 City Metro’ area than the AFL Grand Final.”

pussycat wrote: Thu Oct 05, 2017 8:45 am

NlolRL wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2017 10:40 pm

pussycat wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2017 10:03 pm

Not the cities - the 5 cities (metro). When he surveyed all of Australia eg. Wollongong, Newcastle. Canberra, Illawarra etc. He found pretty much what Oztam found.. There was very little difference.

wrong. He said the AFL smashed it in the cities, but the regional markets were better for the NRL
“Interestingly, despite the larger audience of the AFL Grand Final than the NRL Grand Final – this difference was entirely a result of larger audiences in Australia’s five largest ‘Capital Cities’. There was little difference in the total viewers in the rest of Australia between the two matches with Roy Morgan showing the NRL Grand Final had a higher number of TV viewers outside the ‘5 City Metro’ area than the AFL Grand Final.”

So your back to cherry picking the results . Typical of you fumblers only want to include the 5 capital cities not all Australia.


If your going to post something at least be aware of what it says!


“Interestingly, despite the larger audience of the AFL Grand Final than the NRL Grand Final – this difference was entirely a result of larger audiences in Australia’s five largest ‘Capital Cities’

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Thu Oct 05, 2017 10:12 am

LOL LOL

POLLS I WILL NEVER BELIEVE POLLS

LET ALONE A TXT SURVEY

ANYONE REMEMBER TRUMP

EVERY POLL RATED HIM A 10% CHANCE