Talking Footy

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:22 pm

Panthers was still massive before packer>> they just expanded since onwards

lol you and your mini casinos>>

your like a broken record

the NRLOL club operating revenue is low and shit
merchandise sales are low
crowds are low
memberships are low
they play in a 20k stadium yes but have crap crowds
pretty much their income consists of poker machines from their leagues club! FF if any one had had the option to lend them the amount of money Jimmy Packer did to build a mini casino they would be wealthy like the panthers as well

then we have the brain dead league fold s beating their chest how wealthy they are
im just pointing out why & the reason!
the panthers situation is hilarious when you break down the finances, it makes AFL minnows the Kangaroos look like the collingwoods & west coast eagles

The missing link seems to be jealous of RL's revenue streams. Back into the cave pal, pull up the mammoth skin, curl up into the foetal position and think ya mamma out picking berries!!!!!!

You'd think so.

Terry wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2017 2:48 pm

The missing link seems to be jealous of RL's revenue streams. Back into the cave pal, pull up the mammoth skin, curl up into the foetal position and think ya mamma out picking berries!!!!!!

no revenue streams, membership, sponsorship, merchandise sales reflects on the bottom line and strength of a club!
i like to point this out because it reflects the difference between the AFL and NRLOL clubs

but but the panthers own loads of poker machines that a billionair lent us money for

Come on missing link - suck on your brontosaurus bone and try to let the moment pass lololololololololo.

For the intelligent posters here is the good work the Panthers and Packer are doing;

http://www.mediamanint.com/articles/james_packer8.html

Link - get mamma to bathe your grazed knuckles - they must be hurting bad today lololololololololol.

pussycat wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2017 2:20 pm

NlolRL wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:33 pm

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:30 pm

I'm not talking about attendances or memberships>>

I'm talking as a Business>>>

Panthers play out of 20k stadium>> how big do you want them to get.

Well looking at AFL clubs, the one's that I would describe as 'Massive' are healthy in every area, finances, sponsorship, fans, members, and crowds. If the Panthers have a successful business model but struggle to attract support I wouldnt call that massive

AFL, Perfect in every way You mean after the $80m in handouts and $50m in loans .

what does a loan have to with being massive or not? I know a number of wealthy people who have significant loans.

As for handouts, arent they also part of the nrl?

leagueiscrap wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:00 pm

Terry wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2017 2:48 pm

The missing link seems to be jealous of RL's revenue streams. Back into the cave pal, pull up the mammoth skin, curl up into the foetal position and think ya mamma out picking berries!!!!!!

no revenue streams, membership, sponsorship, merchandise sales reflects on the bottom line and strength of a club!
i like to point this out because it reflects the difference between the AFL and NRLOL clubs

but but the panthers own loads of poker machines that a billionair lent us money for

You fucking brain dead flog
This thread is about the business side of clubs
Yet you rant with your inane shit .
Business wise the panthers are big
You can't seem to handle that fact .

NlolRL wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:21 pm

pussycat wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2017 2:20 pm

NlolRL wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:33 pm

Well looking at AFL clubs, the one's that I would describe as 'Massive' are healthy in every area, finances, sponsorship, fans, members, and crowds. If the Panthers have a successful business model but struggle to attract support I wouldnt call that massive

AFL, Perfect in every way You mean after the $80m in handouts and $50m in loans .

what does a loan have to with being massive or not? I know a number of wealthy people who have significant loans.

As for handouts, arent they also part of the nrl?

Nrl 6.5m in 2017. AFL 82m . in 2017

Actually what I was laughing was your claim that your clubs were perfect.

pussycat wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2017 5:14 pm

NlolRL wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:21 pm

pussycat wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2017 2:20 pm

AFL, Perfect in every way You mean after the $80m in handouts and $50m in loans .

what does a loan have to with being massive or not? I know a number of wealthy people who have significant loans.

As for handouts, arent they also part of the nrl?

Nrl 6.5m in 2017. AFL 82m . in 2017

Actually what I was laughing was your claim that your clubs were perfect.

firstly, on hand outs I call BS to 6.5m for your entire comp. Second, where did I say our clubs are perfect?

NlolRL wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2017 5:34 pm

pussycat wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2017 5:14 pm

NlolRL wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:21 pm

what does a loan have to with being massive or not? I know a number of wealthy people who have significant loans.

As for handouts, arent they also part of the nrl?

Nrl 6.5m in 2017. AFL 82m . in 2017

Actually what I was laughing was your claim that your clubs were perfect.

firstly, on hand outs I call BS to 6.5m for your entire comp. Second, where did I say our clubs are perfect?

Care factor = Zero .

pussycat wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:02 pm

NlolRL wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2017 5:34 pm

pussycat wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2017 5:14 pm

Nrl 6.5m in 2017. AFL 82m . in 2017

Actually what I was laughing was your claim that your clubs were perfect.

firstly, on hand outs I call BS to 6.5m for your entire comp. Second, where did I say our clubs are perfect?

Care factor = Zero .


What would you call that. ' Well looking at AFL clubs, the one's that I would describe as 'Massive' are healthy in every area, finances, sponsorship, fans, members, and crowds.'

I said "the one's that I would consider as 'Massive', not all clubs you tool

Maybe so pal but finances are very objective - and the Panthers are 60 mill in front. Fans, members and crowds are very subjective. As I've pointed out repeatedly on this site Serie A in Italy and Ligue 1 in France average crowds are around 20k per game.

The Panthers are a number of suburbs on the outskirts of Sydney. If they average around 15k by world standards that is very, very healthy.

It's just your tiny mind that can't process these concepts, as simple as they are.

Terry wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2017 7:01 pm

Maybe so pal but finances are very objective - and the Panthers are 60 mill in front. Fans, members and crowds are very subjective. As I've pointed out repeatedly on this site Serie A in Italy and Ligue 1 in France average crowds are around 20k per game.

The Panthers are a number of suburbs on the outskirts of Sydney. If they average around 15k by world standards that is very, very healthy.

It's just your tiny mind that can't process these concepts, as simple as they are.

fans members and crowds are very subjective.............



Some of these NRL clubs have healthy business arms but it seems like the RL part is just a part time interest. They struggle big time to thrive as sporting clubs in their own right

Pal, this is the problem when you live in the fumbling bubble - you have NFI!! There is a whole other world out there. Go look for it. Break out pal. Please try to take a world view - it will help you immensely in your cognitive function.

Terry wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2017 7:40 pm

Pal, this is the problem when you live in the fumbling bubble - you have NFI!! There is a whole other world out there. Go look for it. Break out pal. Please try to take a world view - it will help you immensely in your cognitive function.

your comments are basically repeated by all the RL fans on here, and no doubt come from LU. Just like all other terms like Kevin Shady, fumbleball, ******* etc etc. I think it's you guys who need to break out of the bubble