Page 2 of 2

Re: Rugby League's strongest too strong for AFL

Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2016 11:24 pm
by leagueiscrap
AFLcrap1 wrote:
They played at the highest level .
Try to keep up .
picked as promotional tools, struggled to make the the team in a wooden spoon winning sides filled with kids!

try to go with fact, logic & reality spazza! :wave:
i know its difficult for you! so get your nurse to help

Re: Rugby League's strongest too strong for AFL

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 5:49 am
by AFLcrap1
But but but but but but but


Can't argue with facts so you rant .



They played at the highest level .
Got paid more than others who had played all their lives .
& once again .
Stick to the fucking topic .
This is about who has the strongest players .

Over to you .
Which hat rack can lift more than an NRL player

Re: Rugby League's strongest too strong for AFL

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 4:45 pm
by NRL&NFLweLaughATafl
AFL is a such a joke, funny how not one of their players has ever made first grade Rugby League.

I guess it must be hard knowing you have to actually be able to catch and kick over a cross bar in real codes. :(/

Re: Rugby League's strongest too strong for AFL

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 5:44 pm
by Fred
It would be a pay cut i think? I am sure if the right money wad offerred to a big AFL star they may be tempted... but the nrl would learn from the mistake the AFL made i think.

Re: Rugby League's strongest too strong for AFL

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 6:02 pm
by leagueiscrap
NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote:
AFL is a such a joke, funny how not one of their players has ever made first grade Rugby League.

I guess it must be hard knowing you have to actually be able to catch and kick over a cross bar in real codes. :(/
Yeah because league, the dumbed down simplified version from union is a really skilled game!
Throw or catch a 5 meter psd with a rubber ball & run with the ball under your arm.

There is a reason why leagues finest were out played by a bunch of kids in wooden spoon winning sides.

Saying claiming there is any skill in league is basically admitting you are retarrrd! Something that any non league fan will already be assuming of a league fan

Re: Rugby League's strongest too strong for AFL

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 6:35 pm
by NRL&NFLweLaughATafl
leagueiscrap wrote:
NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote:
AFL is a such a joke, funny how not one of their players has ever made first grade Rugby League.

I guess it must be hard knowing you have to actually be able to catch and kick over a cross bar in real codes. :(/
Yeah because league, the dumbed down simplified version from union is a really skilled game!
Throw or catch a 5 meter psd with a rubber ball & run with the ball under your arm.

There is a reason why leagues finest were out played by a bunch of kids in wooden spoon winning sides.

Saying claiming there is any skill in league is basically admitting you are retarrrd! Something that any non league fan will already be assuming of a league fan
Funny how NRL players are said to unskilled, yet for some reason AFL just keeps offering them contracts to play AFL.

From Johnathon Thurston to Darren Lockyer to Greg Inglis.

Kayln Ponger from the cowboys is even being given offers from the AFL to play for the lions.

And how about Kieren Jack. Played Rugby League throughout his teens and now plays for the Swans.

Such a breeze to play AFL with a Rugby League background :mrgreen:

Re: Rugby League's strongest too strong for AFL

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 8:42 pm
by AFLcrap1
lol
The standard dingbat rant .

Now back on topic .

Why are AFL players weaker than RL players .

Re: Rugby League's strongest too strong for AFL

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 10:25 pm
by NRL&NFLweLaughATafl
Fred wrote:
It would be a pay cut i think? I am sure if the right money wad offerred to a big AFL star they may be tempted... but the nrl would learn from the mistake the AFL made i think.
It would be too much of a risk too. Most AFL players would have to put on muscle mass to even get a start in Rugby League.

Re: Rugby League's strongest too strong for AFL

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 10:47 pm
by AFLcrap1
NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote:
Fred wrote:
It would be a pay cut i think? I am sure if the right money wad offerred to a big AFL star they may be tempted... but the nrl would learn from the mistake the AFL made i think.
It would be too much of a risk too. Most AFL players would have to put on muscle mass to even get a start in Rugby League.
& learn to catch a ball
Learn to tackle
Learn to stay on the field ....no 100 interchanges in Rl

But most of all they would Havta give up the anorexia diet .
Lift some weights
Gain some strength .

It won't happen .
For the simple reason when they step out of the bubble they are shown up .

Would love to see a weight lifting contest between the sports .
Would end as well for the fumblers as when they tried to get in the boxing ring with RL players .

Re: Rugby League's strongest too strong for AFL

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 10:00 am
by Fred
NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote:
Fred wrote:
It would be a pay cut i think? I am sure if the right money wad offerred to a big AFL star they may be tempted... but the nrl would learn from the mistake the AFL made i think.
It would be too much of a risk too. Most AFL players would have to put on muscle mass to even get a start in Rugby League.

True re putting on muscle mass i think as the nature of nrl is.

Re: Rugby League's strongest too strong for AFL

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 11:10 am
by leagueiscrap
Intentcity wrote:
What if the 2 codes had a spelling bee?
I'm pretty sure the bumsniffer would be flat out trying to spell his name, let alone anything else

Re: Rugby League's strongest too strong for AFL

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 3:15 pm
by AFLcrap1
Intentcity wrote:
What if the 2 codes had a spelling bee?
If fumblers spell anything like dingbat ...it's all over before it starts