Talking Footy

Swans4ever wrote:

leeroy*NRL* wrote:

The Only reason is even considering an Upgrade is because of cricket
and the 20/20 World CUP

not the giants

Doesn't really matter what all the reasons are I for one think that a bigger stadium may also attract RL teams and A League games there could be a variety of reasons but a 36k stadium would clearly benefit the Giants.

rectangle grounds are pathetic on oval grounds.

it does nothing for the footy codes
bar the giants cricket and easter show..

leeroy*NRL* wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

leeroy*NRL* wrote:

The Only reason is even considering an Upgrade is because of cricket
and the 20/20 World CUP

not the giants

Doesn't really matter what all the reasons are I for one think that a bigger stadium may also attract RL teams and A League games there could be a variety of reasons but a 36k stadium would clearly benefit the Giants.

rectangle grounds are pathetic on oval grounds.

it does nothing for the footy codes
bar the giants cricket and easter show..

Then why does St.George play at SCG? I don't in this day and age it is as big of a deal as it is made out no one seemed to worry about it back in the day when we didn't have big screens at the ground.

They will not nor do they deserve an upgrade. They have robb d various governments of funds too many times.

post_hoc wrote:

They will not nor do they deserve an upgrade. They have robb d various governments of funds too many times.

Oh like the FFA did when they got 45 mil of tax payers money to bid on a WC that was already decided - very hypocritical even for you post hoc!

Swans4ever wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

They will not nor do they deserve an upgrade. They have robb d various governments of funds too many times.

Oh like the FFA did when they got 45 mil of tax payers money to bid on a WC that was already decided - very hypocritical even for you post hoc!

Really you knew it was decided? I think there was an investigation, I suppose you gave evidence? Or are you making stories up again?

Lol I'm no soccer fan & think porky is a tool .
But Jesus he's schooling swines
Lol .

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Lol I'm no soccer fan & think porky is a tool .
But Jesus he's schooling swines
Lol .

Now that's a backhanded compliment lol

Not really
He gets schooled quite often .
When you post shit & can't back it up with a source then you get smashed

Swines gets smashed .

post_hoc wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

They will not nor do they deserve an upgrade. They have robb d various governments of funds too many times.

Oh like the FFA did when they got 45 mil of tax payers money to bid on a WC that was already decided - very hypocritical even for you post hoc!

Really you knew it was decided? I think there was an investigation, I suppose you gave evidence? Or are you making stories up again?

You serious it was a bid doomed to failure we got ONE vote in the first round and then none thereafter but I notice Frank and his mates got a lot of money and gifts with what to show for it! Now who has his head in the sand but what do you expect of a fan that followers a sport where juniors pay the Salarys of their a league players!

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Not really
He gets schooled quite often .
When you post shit & can't back it up with a source then you get smashed

Swines gets smashed .

Oh fuck off why don't you actually have an opinion rather than the usual line - and are you going to start your usual BS?? Your nothing but a loon who accuses others of what he does!

BHaaa
I can bump a few threads where you were caught out & run like a dog .

You've made a claim in here & as usual when asked for some proof ...you can't provide .

AFLcrap1 wrote:

BHaaa
I can bump a few threads where you were caught out & run like a dog .

You've made a claim in here & as usual when asked for some proof ...you can't provide .

And I can bump a few of yours but I don't take up endless post on BS. Your a hypocrite and your only thing to say is your usual trolling - I don't deliberately put down RL but highlight that both codes have exactly the same problems! Your a loon!

Oh my
& where have I posted that both codes don't have the same problems .
I'll wait

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Oh my
& where have I posted that both codes don't have the same problems .
I'll wait

When have you ever posted RL has any problems I bet I'll wait longer

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

BHaaa
I can bump a few threads where you were caught out & run like a dog .

You've made a claim in here & as usual when asked for some proof ...you can't provide .

And I can bump a few of yours but I don't take up endless post on BS. Your a hypocrite and your only thing to say is your usual trolling - I don't deliberately put down RL but highlight that both codes have exactly the same problems! Your a loon!

your not allowed to bump old threads or post old articles that are older than a few days. only spazza can & other members of the tin foil hat clan