Talking Footy

NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Terry wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Terry wrote:

The funniest part was the fumbling, stumbling, bumbling unskilled nature of this so called 'game'. Aren't the fumblers embarrassed by their 'game' ? If they're not they damn well should be lololololololol. What a rabble lolololol

I don't know aren't you embarrassed that RL players only have to throw a ball and still miss their target, continuously knock the ball on. only have to fall on the ground to score a try and can't do that right??? Or soccer where they only have to kick the ball (haven't worked out how to pick the ball up) and miss their teammates - miss goals can't even keep to the off side rule??? Best not to comment when you don't understand that our game doesn't penalise dropping the ball (unless you first have possession and prior opportunity), you really are an insecure person if that's what upsets you in life!

It dosen't upset me at all swines. I think it's hilarious lolololololol. It's even funnier watching you fumbleball zealots try to defend this hopeless rabble lololololol. Get the helmet on swines, fight the good fight pal, the great fumbling, stumbling, bumbling circus is on the way, all clowns welcome lolololololol. Balance, skill, dexterity, athletic ability not required, heck you even get a point for missing lolololo.olollolo

But let's talk about skill shall we Terry, RL players now learning to kick like AFL and Mark like AFL, I'd say that's a reflection of the fact who has the better skills in those areas - now I'm not putting RL down there things we learn from that sport but you seem to have no point. So tell me what part of fumbling or stumbling is in the rules???? I find it strange that fans of a sport where they have to place their heads near other guys bums are criticising another code!!

Mate I love the word skill because I know there is so little required in AFL.

NRL players catch high bombs all the time. Yet it is such a big deal in AFL to catch a kick that you get a free kick at goal.


Now lets talk actual goals. Is a well known fact AFL scorelines would likely be in the 20s if they had to score between goals with a crossbar and no side goals for missed kicks.

HOW CAN YOU CALL AFL SKILLFUL WHEN YOU HAVE NO CROSSBAR AND EXTRA SIDE GOALS FOR MISSED KICKS??
NO SPORT IS EASIER TO KICK GOALS THAN AFL FACT.

HOW ABOUT THE OUT OF BOUNDS LINE. PLAY ON IF YOU PUT YOUR FOOT ON THE OUT BOUNDARY LINE IN AFL.
ANYTHING TO MAKE THINGS EASIER.

AND YEAH IF YOU DROP THE BALL IN AFL, JUST PICK IT UP AND PLAY ON LOL =D> =D>

Deadset there is no sport that is more moronic that AFL. It is beyond stupidity.

NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote:

More funny AFL videos on the way. Watch this space.

leagueiscrap wrote:

NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Terry wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Terry wrote:

The funniest part was the fumbling, stumbling, bumbling unskilled nature of this so called 'game'. Aren't the fumblers embarrassed by their 'game' ? If they're not they damn well should be lololololololol. What a rabble lolololol

I don't know aren't you embarrassed that RL players only have to throw a ball and still miss their target, continuously knock the ball on. only have to fall on the ground to score a try and can't do that right??? Or soccer where they only have to kick the ball (haven't worked out how to pick the ball up) and miss their teammates - miss goals can't even keep to the off side rule??? Best not to comment when you don't understand that our game doesn't penalise dropping the ball (unless you first have possession and prior opportunity), you really are an insecure person if that's what upsets you in life!

It dosen't upset me at all swines. I think it's hilarious lolololololol. It's even funnier watching you fumbleball zealots try to defend this hopeless rabble lololololol. Get the helmet on swines, fight the good fight pal, the great fumbling, stumbling, bumbling circus is on the way, all clowns welcome lolololololol. Balance, skill, dexterity, athletic ability not required, heck you even get a point for missing lolololo.olollolo

But let's talk about skill shall we Terry, RL players now learning to kick like AFL and Mark like AFL, I'd say that's a reflection of the fact who has the better skills in those areas - now I'm not putting RL down there things we learn from that sport but you seem to have no point. So tell me what part of fumbling or stumbling is in the rules???? I find it strange that fans of a sport where they have to place their heads near other guys bums are criticising another code!!

Mate I love the word skill because I know there is so little required in AFL.

NRL players catch high bombs all the time. Yet it is such a big deal in AFL to catch a kick that you get a free kick at goal.


Now lets talk actual goals. Is a well known fact AFL scorelines would likely be in the 20s if they had to score between goals with a crossbar and no side goals for missed kicks.

HOW CAN YOU CALL AFL SKILLFUL WHEN YOU HAVE NO CROSSBAR AND EXTRA SIDE GOALS FOR MISSED KICKS??
NO SPORT IS EASIER TO KICK GOALS THAN AFL FACT.

HOW ABOUT THE OUT OF BOUNDS LINE. PLAY ON IF YOU PUT YOUR FOOT ON THE OUT BOUNDARY LINE IN AFL.
ANYTHING TO MAKE THINGS EASIER.

AND YEAH IF YOU DROP THE BALL IN AFL, JUST PICK IT UP AND PLAY ON LOL =D> =D>

Deadset there is no sport that is more moronic that AFL. It is beyond stupidity.

AFL is that easy to play thats why the NRLOL finest were made to look stupid, by a bunch of kids

NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote:

leagueiscrap wrote:

NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Terry wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Terry wrote:

The funniest part was the fumbling, stumbling, bumbling unskilled nature of this so called 'game'. Aren't the fumblers embarrassed by their 'game' ? If they're not they damn well should be lololololololol. What a rabble lolololol

I don't know aren't you embarrassed that RL players only have to throw a ball and still miss their target, continuously knock the ball on. only have to fall on the ground to score a try and can't do that right??? Or soccer where they only have to kick the ball (haven't worked out how to pick the ball up) and miss their teammates - miss goals can't even keep to the off side rule??? Best not to comment when you don't understand that our game doesn't penalise dropping the ball (unless you first have possession and prior opportunity), you really are an insecure person if that's what upsets you in life!

It dosen't upset me at all swines. I think it's hilarious lolololololol. It's even funnier watching you fumbleball zealots try to defend this hopeless rabble lololololol. Get the helmet on swines, fight the good fight pal, the great fumbling, stumbling, bumbling circus is on the way, all clowns welcome lolololololol. Balance, skill, dexterity, athletic ability not required, heck you even get a point for missing lolololo.olollolo

But let's talk about skill shall we Terry, RL players now learning to kick like AFL and Mark like AFL, I'd say that's a reflection of the fact who has the better skills in those areas - now I'm not putting RL down there things we learn from that sport but you seem to have no point. So tell me what part of fumbling or stumbling is in the rules???? I find it strange that fans of a sport where they have to place their heads near other guys bums are criticising another code!!

Mate I love the word skill because I know there is so little required in AFL.

NRL players catch high bombs all the time. Yet it is such a big deal in AFL to catch a kick that you get a free kick at goal.


Now lets talk actual goals. Is a well known fact AFL scorelines would likely be in the 20s if they had to score between goals with a crossbar and no side goals for missed kicks.

HOW CAN YOU CALL AFL SKILLFUL WHEN YOU HAVE NO CROSSBAR AND EXTRA SIDE GOALS FOR MISSED KICKS??
NO SPORT IS EASIER TO KICK GOALS THAN AFL FACT.

HOW ABOUT THE OUT OF BOUNDS LINE. PLAY ON IF YOU PUT YOUR FOOT ON THE OUT BOUNDARY LINE IN AFL.
ANYTHING TO MAKE THINGS EASIER.

AND YEAH IF YOU DROP THE BALL IN AFL, JUST PICK IT UP AND PLAY ON LOL =D> =D>

Deadset there is no sport that is more moronic that AFL. It is beyond stupidity.

AFL is that easy to play thats why the NRLOL finest were made to look stupid, by a bunch of kids

Mate come back when an AFL gangly player gets even close to making it in first grade NRL. Because so far not one has ever made it.

Also there is no easier goal kicking score system than AFL. It's a laughing stock.

Fred wrote:

I think an AFL pkayer would like that too but it simply doesnt exist in AFL. Kids are generally not going to play rl if growing up outside qld and nsw because it is such a minor sport outside those states and there is little opportunity to play at grassroots generally and if they do play its a massive impost with lots of travel. And kids just do not play it in schools. So really, AFL is what they are bought up on so that is why they play. I dont think they say at 10 that they want to represent their country but nore they want to star at the popular sport their mates are playing. If they did want to represent their country as the main thing they might go to an olympic sport ... maybe someone suitable to rl or uniob may go to shot put or weight lifting etc.

Scott pendlebury wad a very good basketballer and choose AFL ... left the AIS and think the guy who took his spot went on to playing in the nba and australia. Anyway. Dont think playing for your country is a deal breaker as much as made out. I do know a lot of AFL playerd would love a soo format and would love to play. But how do you do that with 4 states being AFL and a heap of players coming from qld and nsw.

NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote:

Fred wrote:

I think an AFL pkayer would like that too but it simply doesnt exist in AFL. Kids are generally not going to play rl if growing up outside qld and nsw because it is such a minor sport outside those states and there is little opportunity to play at grassroots generally and if they do play its a massive impost with lots of travel. And kids just do not play it in schools. So really, AFL is what they are bought up on so that is why they play. I dont think they say at 10 that they want to represent their country but nore they want to star at the popular sport their mates are playing. If they did want to represent their country as the main thing they might go to an olympic sport ... maybe someone suitable to rl or uniob may go to shot put or weight lifting etc.

Scott pendlebury wad a very good basketballer and choose AFL ... left the AIS and think the guy who took his spot went on to playing in the nba and australia. Anyway. Dont think playing for your country is a deal breaker as much as made out. I do know a lot of AFL playerd would love a soo format and would love to play. But how do you do that with 4 states being AFL and a heap of players coming from qld and nsw.

Would have to be a summer thing if AFL ever did origin.

But would probably be as much as a laughing stock as AFL international rules if NSW and Qld were in it.
NSW & Qld simply don't have the player depth that Southern states have. Victoria could set up 3 Origin teams all better than QLD and NSW.

As for Rugby league being a minor sport outside of NSW and Qld.
Rugby League is more than just two States of Australia you halfwit.

New Zealand, England, Scotland, PNG, Samoa.
There is over 20 professional Rugby League clubs in the UK alone.
Something AFL will never ever have.

Just remember unlike AFL, the NRL has more than just one single nation to get it's players.

NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote:

Fred wrote:

I think an AFL pkayer would like that too but it simply doesnt exist in AFL. Kids are generally not going to play rl if growing up outside qld and nsw because it is such a minor sport outside those states and there is little opportunity to play at grassroots generally and if they do play its a massive impost with lots of travel. And kids just do not play it in schools. So really, AFL is what they are bought up on so that is why they play. I dont think they say at 10 that they want to represent their country but nore they want to star at the popular sport their mates are playing. If they did want to represent their country as the main thing they might go to an olympic sport ... maybe someone suitable to rl or uniob may go to shot put or weight lifting etc..

Scott pendlebury wad a very good basketballer and choose AFL ... left the AIS and think the guy who took his spot went on to playing in the nba and australia. Anyway. Dont think playing for your country is a deal breaker as much as made out. I do know a lot of AFL playerd would love a soo format and would love to play. But how do you do that with 4 states being AFL and a heap of players coming from qld and nsw.

Would have to be a summer thing if AFL ever did origin.

But would probably be as much as a laughing stock as AFL international rules if NSW and Qld were in it.
NSW & Qld simply don't have the player depth that Southern states have. Victoria could set up 3 Origin teams all better than QLD and NSW.

As for Rugby league being a minor sport outside of NSW and Qld.
Rugby League is more than just two States of Australia you halfwit.

New Zealand, England, Scotland, PNG, Samoa.
There is over 20 professional Rugby League clubs in the UK alone.
Something AFL will never ever have.

Just remember unlike AFL, the NRL has more than just one single nation to get it's players.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Rl is pretty big in the nt as well as the act.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Rl is pretty big in the nt as well as the act.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Oh my
Can you show where he said that .
You just post utter fucking rot
He said RL is pretty big in the NT & ACT . He's right .
Yet you go into FIGJAM bot mode then say he says something that is plainly not there