Predictions: The next A-League TV deal

Which is the best football code? Here you can have it out with other football fans.
User avatar
post_hoc
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2256
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:09 pm
Team: Western Sydney Wanderers
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal

Post by post_hoc »

The_Wookie wrote:
post_hoc wrote:
I love that comment, the FFA Cup matches are barely broadcastable LOL, based on what? The grounds they play on, oh yea I forgot you AFL types abandoned local grounds years ago. The FFA Cup continues to grow and every single football fan in this country loves it.
Clearly you simply don't get it.

Overseas rights are worthless? Really? Again something I am afraid you AFL types have zero concept about. Stick to what you know Wookie.
Hey fucktard. Come at me when you get more than 29 million a year in total for broadcast rights. I know what the fuck im talking about.
Why reply like that? I was pretty civil, I simply called you out for not really having a clue about the FFA Cup, which from your background and sporting preferences I am pretty comfortable in making that assessment.

Come at me when you can get more than 1 country playing your sport in any meaningful way. But I will have to delegate it to my great grand children, Football getting more than your 'quoted' figure should allow me to 'come at you' fairly quickly.
Football in NSW
- Football 200,868
- AFL NSW/ACT 28,468
- Rugby League 96,041
- Rugby Union 40,685
Football has 22% more players than the other football codes combined
User avatar
post_hoc
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2256
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:09 pm
Team: Western Sydney Wanderers
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal

Post by post_hoc »

Terry wrote:
The_Wookie wrote:
post_hoc wrote:
I love that comment, the FFA Cup matches are barely broadcastable LOL, based on what? The grounds they play on, oh yea I forgot you AFL types abandoned local grounds years ago. The FFA Cup continues to grow and every single football fan in this country loves it.
Clearly you simply don't get it.

Overseas rights are worthless? Really? Again something I am afraid you AFL types have zero concept about. Stick to what you know Wookie.
Hey fucktard. Come at me when you get more than 29 million a year in total for broadcast rights. I know what the fuck im talking about.
I don't think you do Wookie and not only that you're a foul mouth fool. You know about fumbleball and nothing else. If I were you I'd stick to your strengths..........that should be easy....you ain't got many.....lloololo.oololol.......suburban fumblers......lololololololol...woops.....dropped another one.....lololololol
Thanks Terry
Football in NSW
- Football 200,868
- AFL NSW/ACT 28,468
- Rugby League 96,041
- Rugby Union 40,685
Football has 22% more players than the other football codes combined
AFLcrap1
Coach
Coach
Posts: 18893
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2013 9:49 am
Team: The Scottish Puffins
Location:
Has thanked: 107 times
Been liked: 75 times

Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal

Post by AFLcrap1 »

The problem for Sokka is that it's not really worth anything to commercial networks
The lack of natural add breaks make it unviable.

Unless there is a bidding war between Fox & Optus or another media company then there is little scope for a big increase
TLPG 🤣liar extraordinaire
You should thank me for publishing your IP

and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
🤣
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.
:^o :^o
User avatar
post_hoc
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2256
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:09 pm
Team: Western Sydney Wanderers
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal

Post by post_hoc »

AFLcrap1 wrote:
The problem for Sokka is that it's not really worth anything to commercial networks
The lack of natural add breaks make it unviable.

Unless there is a bidding war between Fox & Optus or another media company then there is little scope for a big increase
I see what you are saying, BUT Evidence contradicts it

EPL $10 Billion
CSL $1.3 Billion
La Liga 2.3 billion Euro
MLS $720 million

So the lack of natural ad breaks doesn't seem to be an issue for those leagues and TV deals. So I hear what you are saying but I disagree
Football in NSW
- Football 200,868
- AFL NSW/ACT 28,468
- Rugby League 96,041
- Rugby Union 40,685
Football has 22% more players than the other football codes combined
User avatar
Beaussie
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 9570
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
Team: Sydney Swans
Location: Sydney
Has thanked: 344 times
Been liked: 75 times

Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal

Post by Beaussie »

post_hoc wrote:
AFLcrap1 wrote:
The problem for Sokka is that it's not really worth anything to commercial networks
The lack of natural add breaks make it unviable.

Unless there is a bidding war between Fox & Optus or another media company then there is little scope for a big increase
I see what you are saying, BUT Evidence contradicts it

EPL $10 Billion
CSL $1.3 Billion
La Liga 2.3 billion Euro
MLS $720 million

So the lack of natural ad breaks doesn't seem to be an issue for those leagues and TV deals. So I hear what you are saying but I disagree
Soccer is popular where those leagues exist. Hardly the case in Australia though despite years of trying.
User avatar
Beaussie
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 9570
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
Team: Sydney Swans
Location: Sydney
Has thanked: 344 times
Been liked: 75 times

Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal

Post by Beaussie »

The_Wookie wrote:
Eels: The FFA Cup is barely broadcastable. The Wleague is on the ABC. Overseas rights are almost worthless - even in Asia. And they get nothing from the AFC or FIFA run games. Friendlies organised by promoters and the states arent included either. Not to mention that ratings on FTA are HALF what they used to be.
I'm struggling to see where Wookie is wrong on any of these points. Those all being the case, I don't expect the FFA to get much interest from any commercial broadcasters.
Terry
Coach
Coach
Posts: 4818
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:19 pm
Team: Wests Tigers
Location:
Has thanked: 5 times
Been liked: 175 times

Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal

Post by Terry »

Beaussie wrote:
post_hoc wrote:
AFLcrap1 wrote:
The problem for Sokka is that it's not really worth anything to commercial networks
The lack of natural add breaks make it unviable.

Unless there is a bidding war between Fox & Optus or another media company then there is little scope for a big increase
I see what you are saying, BUT Evidence contradicts it

EPL $10 Billion
CSL $1.3 Billion
La Liga 2.3 billion Euro
MLS $720 million

So the lack of natural ad breaks doesn't seem to be an issue for those leagues and TV deals. So I hear what you are saying but I disagree
Soccer is popular where those leagues exist. Hardly the case in Australia though despite years of trying.
How funny are the fumblers here. They're desperately hoping the Aleague crashes and burns. They yell and swear and stamp their feet at any mention of an increase in broadcast fees. But why fumblers why?? If you feel so pathetically challenged by soccer just ignore it. By getting yourselves in a lather about it you're doing yourself emotional harm lololololol. Let it go fumblers, let it go. loloololoolololol.

And for record I think the Aleague will go very well in the new deal with Timmy coming home and other marquee players on the radar.
Terry
Coach
Coach
Posts: 4818
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:19 pm
Team: Wests Tigers
Location:
Has thanked: 5 times
Been liked: 175 times

Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal

Post by Terry »

Beaussie wrote:
The_Wookie wrote:
Eels: The FFA Cup is barely broadcastable. The Wleague is on the ABC. Overseas rights are almost worthless - even in Asia. And they get nothing from the AFC or FIFA run games. Friendlies organised by promoters and the states arent included either. Not to mention that ratings on FTA are HALF what they used to be.
I'm struggling to see where Wookie is wrong on any of these points. Those all being the case, I don't expect the FFA to get much interest from any commercial broadcasters.
I think you're just struggling fullstop pal lolololol. Keep building that fumbleball wall around you and don't dare have a peep over the parapet, it's scary whats out there lolololol.
User avatar
post_hoc
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2256
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:09 pm
Team: Western Sydney Wanderers
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal

Post by post_hoc »

Beaussie wrote:
post_hoc wrote:
AFLcrap1 wrote:
The problem for Sokka is that it's not really worth anything to commercial networks
The lack of natural add breaks make it unviable.

Unless there is a bidding war between Fox & Optus or another media company then there is little scope for a big increase
I see what you are saying, BUT Evidence contradicts it

EPL $10 Billion
CSL $1.3 Billion
La Liga 2.3 billion Euro
MLS $720 million

So the lack of natural ad breaks doesn't seem to be an issue for those leagues and TV deals. So I hear what you are saying but I disagree
Soccer is popular where those leagues exist. Hardly the case in Australia though despite years of trying.
Hang on, I thought the issue mentioned by afltiscrap was that football has a problem because of no natural stoppages. The point I was making was on that issue those examples quoted don't seem to have a problem. Unless you are telling me the football in those countries is different and their are stoppages?

So you can't change the argument halfway through because you didn't like the answer.

This is directed entirely at Beaussie, afltiscrap sorry I had to bring in your post.
Football in NSW
- Football 200,868
- AFL NSW/ACT 28,468
- Rugby League 96,041
- Rugby Union 40,685
Football has 22% more players than the other football codes combined
User avatar
post_hoc
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2256
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:09 pm
Team: Western Sydney Wanderers
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal

Post by post_hoc »

Beaussie wrote:
The_Wookie wrote:
Eels: The FFA Cup is barely broadcastable. The Wleague is on the ABC. Overseas rights are almost worthless - even in Asia. And they get nothing from the AFC or FIFA run games. Friendlies organised by promoters and the states arent included either. Not to mention that ratings on FTA are HALF what they used to be.
I'm struggling to see where Wookie is wrong on any of these points. Those all being the case, I don't expect the FFA to get much interest from any commercial broadcasters.
It is 3 years old, it is a competition that bridges all levels of football, amateur, semi-professional and professional so of course you don't understand. The HAL is being separated from the Socceroos broadcasts, and the W League is a seperate competion, so not really sure either you or Wilkie have a clue what you are talking about.
Football in NSW
- Football 200,868
- AFL NSW/ACT 28,468
- Rugby League 96,041
- Rugby Union 40,685
Football has 22% more players than the other football codes combined
User avatar
leagueiscrap
Banned
Posts: 7862
Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 11:08 am
Team: Essendon
Location:
Has thanked: 16 times
Been liked: 7 times

Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal

Post by leagueiscrap »

post_hoc wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
The_Wookie wrote:
Eels: The FFA Cup is barely broadcastable. The Wleague is on the ABC. Overseas rights are almost worthless - even in Asia. And they get nothing from the AFC or FIFA run games. Friendlies organised by promoters and the states arent included either. Not to mention that ratings on FTA are HALF what they used to be.
I'm struggling to see where Wookie is wrong on any of these points. Those all being the case, I don't expect the FFA to get much interest from any commercial broadcasters.
It is 3 years old, it is a competition that bridges all levels of football, amateur, semi-professional and professional so of course you don't understand. The HAL is being separated from the Socceroos broadcasts, and the W League is a seperate competion, so not really sure either you or Wilkie have a clue what you are talking about.
for the A League to get a decent deal, they need a superleague war like League has, two media barrons going at a pissing contest whoring the product out
Australian sporting sponsorship
AFL excess of $50m
A league $30 million plus
ARU $27 million
NRLOL $25 million

Leagueiscrap
and she still changes your nappies as well!
pusseycat replys
Only when I have an accident.
User avatar
post_hoc
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2256
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:09 pm
Team: Western Sydney Wanderers
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal

Post by post_hoc »

leagueiscrap wrote:
post_hoc wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
The_Wookie wrote:
Eels: The FFA Cup is barely broadcastable. The Wleague is on the ABC. Overseas rights are almost worthless - even in Asia. And they get nothing from the AFC or FIFA run games. Friendlies organised by promoters and the states arent included either. Not to mention that ratings on FTA are HALF what they used to be.
I'm struggling to see where Wookie is wrong on any of these points. Those all being the case, I don't expect the FFA to get much interest from any commercial broadcasters.
It is 3 years old, it is a competition that bridges all levels of football, amateur, semi-professional and professional so of course you don't understand. The HAL is being separated from the Socceroos broadcasts, and the W League is a seperate competion, so not really sure either you or Wilkie have a clue what you are talking about.
for the A League to get a decent deal, they need a superleague war like League has, two media barrons going at a pissing contest whoring the product out
Hopefully without the split competition, it will depend on how hard Optus goes for it
Football in NSW
- Football 200,868
- AFL NSW/ACT 28,468
- Rugby League 96,041
- Rugby Union 40,685
Football has 22% more players than the other football codes combined
sydneyfc
Coach
Coach
Posts: 1802
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2014 7:01 pm
Team: Sydney FC
Location: Sydney
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal

Post by sydneyfc »

not as optimistic as others in regards to the tv deal, i feel like its a no brainer that it will improve, but some people saying we'll get 80m etc i just dont see it.

im expecting $60m and anything more than that would be a welcomed bonus

gallops presser where he says cahill was virtually the most important part of the tv deal was cringey as well. maybe im just bitter cahill-despiser andd that....i just cant like a guy thatkept telling us that he's doing it for the good of the game(playing in the US and china) refused to come to australia until we had to fork out $4 million(half of which is subsidized by the ffa which hurts all the clubs) at age 37 ffs- but its ok! he has footy clinics '4 da kids' in the school holidays...but charges them $1000 a head to participate....lol
ParraEelsNRL
Coach
Coach
Posts: 9495
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
Team: Parramatta
Location: Rugby League Heartland
Has thanked: 14 times
Been liked: 9 times

Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal

Post by ParraEelsNRL »

leagueiscrap wrote:
post_hoc wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
The_Wookie wrote:
Eels: The FFA Cup is barely broadcastable. The Wleague is on the ABC. Overseas rights are almost worthless - even in Asia. And they get nothing from the AFC or FIFA run games. Friendlies organised by promoters and the states arent included either. Not to mention that ratings on FTA are HALF what they used to be.
I'm struggling to see where Wookie is wrong on any of these points. Those all being the case, I don't expect the FFA to get much interest from any commercial broadcasters.
It is 3 years old, it is a competition that bridges all levels of football, amateur, semi-professional and professional so of course you don't understand. The HAL is being separated from the Socceroos broadcasts, and the W League is a seperate competion, so not really sure either you or Wilkie have a clue what you are talking about.
for the A League to get a decent deal, they need a superleague war like League has, two media barrons going at a pissing contest whoring the product out
Oh look, another day another lie, each lie kills a baby panda, you are something special.
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User avatar
Beaussie
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 9570
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
Team: Sydney Swans
Location: Sydney
Has thanked: 344 times
Been liked: 75 times

Re: Predictions: The next A-League TV deal

Post by Beaussie »

sydneyfc wrote:
not as optimistic as others in regards to the tv deal, i feel like its a no brainer that it will improve, but some people saying we'll get 80m etc i just dont see it.

im expecting $60m and anything more than that would be a welcomed bonus

gallops presser where he says cahill was virtually the most important part of the tv deal was cringey as well. maybe im just bitter cahill-despiser andd that....i just cant like a guy thatkept telling us that he's doing it for the good of the game(playing in the US and china) refused to come to australia until we had to fork out $4 million(half of which is subsidized by the ffa which hurts all the clubs) at age 37 ffs- but its ok! he has footy clinics '4 da kids' in the school holidays...but charges them $1000 a head to participate....lol
Finally some reality from a soccer fan. post_hoc take note
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 9 guests