Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

eelofwest wrote:

Sat TV #AFL Night 7 409k (Mel 273k Ade 136k) 7mate 130k (Syd 40k Bri 16k Per 74k) Arvo 7mate 50k (Syd 28k Bri 21k)

Sat STV #AFL #FoxFooty #AFLSwansPies 182k
Sat STV #AFL #FoxFooty #AFLNorthCrows 142k


Like i said ealier, struggle to crack 1 million with 2 games added together..

they arent added together you clown, theyre against each other

Your the clown, i add them together because those 2 games are played at the same time you ******.

Struggling to crack 1million with 4 teams playing...

You want a box of tissues champ? :D :D

*you're......clown

Games played at the same time hurts your overall ratings, not helps it.

Xman wrote:

*you're......clown

Games played at the same time hurts your overall ratings, not helps it.

OMG 4 sets of fans are watching dipshit lol......

To struggle to crack 1 million with that in mind is just pathetic.

The butthurt oozing from you and only in round one is epic to behold, someone get this man a tissue..

eelofwest wrote:

Xman wrote:

*you're......clown

Games played at the same time hurts your overall ratings, not helps it.

OMG 4 sets of fans are watching dipshit lol......

To struggle to crack 1 million with that in mind is just pathetic.

The butthurt oozing from you and only in round one is epic to behold, someone get this man a tissue..

the NRL did it plenty of times last year, and thats on the higher rating Friday night.

Also, the NRL got smashed on Foxtel last night despite having no game on FTA. 275k v 1m plus

the NRLOL fans live and die by their ratings, pick and select figures when it suits them regardless of the scheduling, even though they the TV ratings companies regularly report inaccurate results and they are partly owned by news corp
the stupid oxygen bottles contradict them self all the time

leagueiscrap wrote:

the NRLOL fans live and die by their ratings, pick and select figures when it suits them regardless of the scheduling, even though they the TV ratings companies regularly report inaccurate results and they are partly owned by news corp
the stupid oxygen bottles contradict them self all the time

Lol get your stories straight .
This is what you claimed about ratings boxes.




the TV companies when choosing to give out those rating boxes complete surveys then choose to distribute the rating boxes to which ever basement dwelling looser that watches the most TV during the week, so then the TV companies can then go to the advertisers & claim we have so many hundred thousand people watch out network,





So I have a question about that.


According to you .
Tv stations hand out ratings boxers to select people .
Knowing that they will watch certain programs .
Then try to leverage advertising dollars off companies with these fake numbers .



So once a tv channel has put out fake ratings to show how popular a program or sport is ,they then have to fork out hundreds of millions of dollars to buy the rights to that sport .
Why would they artificially inflate the popularity of a sport when it will drive the price up ?
According to you they are paying big overs for something they know doesn't rate well ,but they lied about that so they could outlay far more than it's worth .

Can you answer that .
It's a simple question regarding your claim about TV ratings companies .

You raised the subject .
Now don't run away this time .
A simple question is highlighted above for you

Leagueiscrap i suggest you do take a holiday for a little while, AFLcrap has you in check mate.

Anything you say from this point is futile....

AFLcrap hats of to you sir, well played.... =D> =D>

AFLcrap1 wrote:

leagueiscrap wrote:

the NRLOL fans live and die by their ratings, pick and select figures when it suits them regardless of the scheduling, even though they the TV ratings companies regularly report inaccurate results and they are partly owned by news corp
the stupid oxygen bottles contradict them self all the time

Lol get your stories straight .
This is what you claimed about ratings boxes.




the TV companies when choosing to give out those rating boxes complete surveys then choose to distribute the rating boxes to which ever basement dwelling looser that watches the most TV during the week, so then the TV companies can then go to the advertisers & claim we have so many hundred thousand people watch out network,





So I have a question about that.


According to you .
Tv stations hand out ratings boxers to select people .
Knowing that they will watch certain programs .
Then try to leverage advertising dollars off companies with these fake numbers .



So once a tv channel has put out fake ratings to show how popular a program or sport is ,they then have to fork out hundreds of millions of dollars to buy the rights to that sport .
Why would they artificially inflate the popularity of a sport when it will drive the price up ?
According to you they are paying big overs for something they know doesn't rate well ,but they lied about that so they could outlay far more than it's worth .

Can you answer that .
It's a simple question regarding your claim about TV ratings companies .

You raised the subject .
Now don't run away this time .
A simple question is highlighted above for you

lol you basement dwellers live and die by those ratings yet they are partly owned by news corp
so when it suits you cry all true and when it doesnt just cry lies lies

I asked one question about your claim .
I asked you not to run .
I asked could you answer
What happened .....the usual
Lol pity Sportsbet didn't have odds on you running like the gutless flog you are .
Can you tell me why you make claims but never want to discuss them .

It's not like everyone here can't see you're a compulsive liar .
They already know .
Seek help

Good one AFLCRAP

Spear Tackled leagueiscrap in a point of no return

The FTA Tv Attendance marginally beating the crowd..
at the Swannies Game in Sydney..

leeroy*NRL* wrote:

The FTA Tv Attendance marginally beating the crowd..
at the Swannies Game in Sydney..

at least the storm dont have that issue :>::

Xman wrote:

leeroy*NRL* wrote:

The FTA Tv Attendance marginally beating the crowd..
at the Swannies Game in Sydney..

at least the storm dont have that issue :>::

Storm get 3 FTA games a year

its ok more people in Melbourne will watch SOO
then Sydney will watch the Swans on FTA

leeroy*NRL* wrote:

Xman wrote:

leeroy*NRL* wrote:

The FTA Tv Attendance marginally beating the crowd..
at the Swannies Game in Sydney..

at least the storm dont have that issue :>::

Storm get 3 FTA games a year

its ok more people in Melbourne will watch SOO
then Sydney will watch the Swans on FTA

they watch SOO, but the storms following shows they think little of the NRL

Xman wrote:

leeroy*NRL* wrote:

Xman wrote:

leeroy*NRL* wrote:

The FTA Tv Attendance marginally beating the crowd..
at the Swannies Game in Sydney..

at least the storm dont have that issue :>::

Storm get 3 FTA games a year

its ok more people in Melbourne will watch SOO
then Sydney will watch the Swans on FTA

they watch SOO, but the storms following shows they think little of the NRL

Storm actually rate really good on Fox that is why..

yeh the Melbourne public do think little of the Storm.. I already know of this..

its exactly the same here in Sydney ( the public think little of the swans)

that is with 1 million more people in the city.