Page 2 of 2
Re: AFL to benefit from backlash against NRL TV deal
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 7:05 pm
by The axe
AFLcrap1 wrote:Lol another fumbler re writing history .
When the TV rights are negotiated & news ltd are on both sides of the table ,how much do you think they saved .
Easy to do when you're selling a product to yourself.
Can't or won't answer the question?
Re: AFL to benefit from backlash against NRL TV deal
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 7:19 pm
by AFLcrap1
Who knows you put a figure on it .
I would say that news undersold the NRL rights by about 200-300 million .
Re: AFL to benefit from backlash against NRL TV deal
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 7:58 pm
by The axe
AFLcrap1 wrote:Who knows you put a figure on it .
I would say that news undersold the NRL rights by about 200-300 million .
Wild guesses is it, why let the facts stand in the way of the perceived truth. How does it work with league fans, if you say it loud enough and often enough it must be true. Always good for a laugh.
Re: AFL to benefit from backlash against NRL TV deal
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 9:48 pm
by AFLcrap1
Slow you avoided putting a figure up .
Lol
My figure comes from the fact we went from 83 mill a yr when news sold the game to itself to over 200 mil a yr .
So yeh we were well undersold .
Re: AFL to benefit from backlash against NRL TV deal
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 10:16 pm
by The axe
AFLcrap1 wrote:Slow you avoided putting a figure up .
Lol
My figure comes from the fact we went from 83 mill a yr when news sold the game to itself to over 200 mil a yr .
So yeh we were well undersold .
I didn't avoid anything I asked the question and got nothing other than wild guess work and assumptions based on what you perceive to be the truth. How about something other than your opinion to support your story.
Re: AFL to benefit from backlash against NRL TV deal
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2015 6:32 am
by AFLcrap1
How about you put up a figure .
I posted what actually happened .feel free to show where my figures are wrong .
You just post shit
Re: AFL to benefit from backlash against NRL TV deal
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2015 6:07 pm
by The axe
AFLcrap1 wrote:How about you put up a figure .
I posted what actually happened .feel free to show where my figures are wrong .
You just post shit
I'm sure I've been down this path with you before, you made a positive claim burden of proof is on you. You stated news ltd cost league 2-300 million prove it.
Re: AFL to benefit from backlash against NRL TV deal
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2015 6:30 pm
by Beaussie
eelofwest wrote:Keep dreaming, more spin to try and work down the NRL's Pay tv deal....
Nothing new was said in that article and like clockworks the blind fumblers lap it up.... :_<> :_<>
Who's laughing now dipshit?
:<> :<> :<>
Re: AFL to benefit from backlash against NRL TV deal
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2015 6:31 pm
by Beaussie
pussycat wrote:Beaussie wrote:Yep, just as I thought. Channel 7, 9, 10 and Foxtel all keen for a piece of the AFL. Let the bidding begin.
Nine, which bought the Nine stations in Perth and Adelaide two years ago as part of a deal under which it paid $450 million over five years for cricket rights, could be in the market for rights to live AFL matches featuring the teams from those two cities.
Live matches, whether home or away, of Port Adelaide and Adelaide, and Fremantle and West Coast, rate extremely well in their home cities and achieve solid figures in Melbourne.
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/busines ... iyya0.html
As I said in another thread Beau, there no shame in coming 2nd, you need to accept it a move on.
Hahaha, god love you pussycat.
How's that silver medal looking. Always will be the little one when it comes to the football codes in Australia. Lap it up losers. :<> :<> :<>
Re: AFL to benefit from backlash against NRL TV deal
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2015 7:59 pm
by AFLcrap1
Lol .
We have only done our FTA side of our deal .