Page 2 of 3
Re: SOO 3 BLOOZE vs MOROONS after effects
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 12:14 am
by ParraEelsNRL
ACT isn't NSW or QLD dopey.

Re: SOO 3 BLOOZE vs MOROONS after effects
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 1:27 am
by leagueiscrap
ParraEelsNRL wrote:ACT isn't NSW or QLD dopey.

Isn't the ACT meant to be bimsniffing heartland?
6k to a game of nrlol on a Friday nite

Re: SOO 3 BLOOZE vs MOROONS after effects
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 9:05 am
by AFLcrap1
Lol Soo has tipped him over the edge .
It was 0 degrees .
Re: SOO 3 BLOOZE vs MOROONS after effects
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 9:11 am
by Swans4ever
ParraEelsNRL wrote:ACT isn't NSW or QLD dopey.

But isn't it RL heartland??
Re: SOO 3 BLOOZE vs MOROONS after effects
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 11:17 am
by AFLsforPussies
AFLcrap1 wrote:Lol Soo has tipped him over the edge .
It was 0 degrees .
The one nation code fumblers are getting so very desperate.

Re: SOO 3 BLOOZE vs MOROONS after effects
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 11:20 am
by ParraEelsNRL
Swans4ever wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:ACT isn't NSW or QLD dopey.

But isn't it RL heartland??
Tell me the last time a team representing the ACT in AFL got 6,000 to a game?
Until then you have nothing.
Re: SOO 3 BLOOZE vs MOROONS after effects
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 11:43 am
by AFLcrap1
Swans4ever wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:ACT isn't NSW or QLD dopey.

But isn't it RL heartland??
You are repeating what dumbo said ..
Give yourself an uppercut .
.
According to your esteemed leader Bea .
Canb is now Aflol territory .

Re: SOO 3 BLOOZE vs MOROONS after effects
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 5:24 pm
by leagueiscrap
ParraEelsNRL wrote:Swans4ever wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:ACT isn't NSW or QLD dopey.

But isn't it RL heartland??
Tell me the last time a team representing the ACT in AFL got 6,000 to a game?
Until then you have nothing.
GWS play there on occasions.
there will never be a AFL team based in the ACT based on financial running costs of an AFL club, which is pretty much double of an NRLOL club.
the raiders are a financial basket case, propped up with taxpayer funding every year as well as tax concessions
http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-new ... 1xzpx.html
BTW isnt the ACT ment to be NRLOL heart land
6k to a game of what is meant to be top grade league
Re: SOO 3 BLOOZE vs MOROONS after effects
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 7:59 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
You still have nothing, just a lot of bs.
Re: SOO 3 BLOOZE vs MOROONS after effects
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 8:01 pm
by AFLcrap1
Just repeats the same shit over & over
Re: SOO 3 BLOOZE vs MOROONS after effects
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 9:54 pm
by leagueiscrap
ParraEelsNRL wrote:You still have nothing, just a lot of bs.
you have NFI do you spazzaeels
http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-new ... 1xzpx.html
there is a brief rundown on the tax payers raiders
even expandion teams like the suns and giants & AFL minnows, western bulldogs and stkilda are turning over better money than nearly all NRLOL clubs
keep your head in the sand! idiot and just continue to be thank full for all the people that pay their taxes for idiots like you to live!
Re: SOO 3 BLOOZE vs MOROONS after effects
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 10:26 pm
by AFLcrap1
Lols you're a clueless hypocrite .
http://www.watoday.com.au/AFL/greater-w ... 2hpuq.html
And although the fledgling outfit will pocket the vast bulk of the undisclosed "commercial-in confidence" sponsorship fee, Oval owners the ACT taxpayers were reassured they would enjoy "a small percentage" of the action.
The "modest but appropriate" fee for the Giants comes on top of the
$26 million the government will pay the Greater Western Sydney over 10 years to play three games each in Canberra each season.
Re: SOO 3 BLOOZE vs MOROONS after effects
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2015 6:40 am
by Swans4ever
ParraEelsNRL wrote:Swans4ever wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:ACT isn't NSW or QLD dopey.

But isn't it RL heartland??
Tell me the last time a team representing the ACT in AFL got 6,000 to a game?
Until then you have nothing.
That's funny 2 games this year have an average of 7800 and 3 games for the last 3 years have averaged above 8k. He'll even the Brumbies got more than that!
Re: SOO 3 BLOOZE vs MOROONS after effects
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2015 6:41 am
by Swans4ever
AFLcrap1 wrote:Lols you're a clueless hypocrite .
http://www.watoday.com.au/AFL/greater-w ... 2hpuq.html
And although the fledgling outfit will pocket the vast bulk of the undisclosed "commercial-in confidence" sponsorship fee, Oval owners the ACT taxpayers were reassured they would enjoy "a small percentage" of the action.
The "modest but appropriate" fee for the Giants comes on top of the
$26 million the government will pay the Greater Western Sydney over 10 years to play three games each in Canberra each season.
Hahaha calling someone a hypocrite?
Re: SOO 3 BLOOZE vs MOROONS after effects
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2015 8:37 pm
by leagueiscrap
AFLcrap1 wrote:Just repeats the same shit over & over
just pointing out the running costs of an AFL club to a NRLOL spazza
but like usual you struggle to add anything decent, just troll & attempto insult and derail things