Re: Mick malthouse career dissed as a result of AFL expansion?
Posted: Fri May 29, 2015 9:05 am
Without Judd, Kruser, Gibbs and I think Murphy - I don't think any inferences can be drawn about the result
www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
Their ruck stocks have improved since Malthouse was there. He traded that dud Sean HamptonThe_Wookie wrote:If you think John Barker will make a difference your kidding yourself. The damage is done with the best forwards we had all sent packing, we have no forward structure, our ruckmen are shit, our backmen are either injured or lack gameplan. Our midfield is full of outside runners with only in and under types. This wont be an easy fix in the short term.
And you know I have no time for your betting bullshit.
Feel your pain on that one.The_Wookie wrote:Shaun Hampson was actually a good ruck, he was a poor forward. We had to trade either him or Warnock and Warnock wasnt wanted by anyone. its a sad indictment on our club that the best ruckman we currently have is Cameron Wood.