Re: Northern Territory. AFL or NRL.
Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 10:22 am
Ask any Aboriginal up there and they'll tell ya its AFL heartland. I really love their passion for the game in NT.
www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
in the remote communities maybeBeaussie wrote:Ask any Aboriginal up there and they'll tell ya its AFL heartland. I really love their passion for the game in NT.
http://www.sportingpulse.com/assoc_page ... -0&a=COMPSRaiderdave wrote:in the remote communities maybeBeaussie wrote:Ask any Aboriginal up there and they'll tell ya its AFL heartland. I really love their passion for the game in NT.
but Ask any city dwelling Koori or non Aboriginal & they'll tell you it isn't wanker
RL rules Darwin these days with huge numbers of easterners/nthners moving there in the last 20 years
Darwin has 2/3 of the Territories population
NT is ours now
K?
docker24 wrote:Ummm stay on topic ladies, gentlemen and raiderdaves.
To Leeroy Jenkins, I meant AFL isn't far behind in ACT. My mistake not qld and NSW.
That comment which was misunderstood started a cat fight lol.
So we can all agree with that NT is split down the middle of both codes?
AhhXman wrote:http://www.sportingpulse.com/assoc_page ... -0&a=COMPSRaiderdave wrote:in the remote communities maybeBeaussie wrote:Ask any Aboriginal up there and they'll tell ya its AFL heartland. I really love their passion for the game in NT.
but Ask any city dwelling Koori or non Aboriginal & they'll tell you it isn't wanker
RL rules Darwin these days with huge numbers of easterners/nthners moving there in the last 20 years
Darwin has 2/3 of the Territories population
NT is ours now
K?
Shows 7 clubs with no more than 15 senior mens teams in total
http://www.foxsportspulse.com/assoc_pag ... -0&a=COMPS
Shows 17 clubs with 29 senior mens teams in total
Its worth noting that an AFL side has at least 5 more players per team compared to RL
LOLRaiderdave wrote:AhhXman wrote:http://www.sportingpulse.com/assoc_page ... -0&a=COMPSRaiderdave wrote:in the remote communities maybeBeaussie wrote:Ask any Aboriginal up there and they'll tell ya its AFL heartland. I really love their passion for the game in NT.
but Ask any city dwelling Koori or non Aboriginal & they'll tell you it isn't wanker
RL rules Darwin these days with huge numbers of easterners/nthners moving there in the last 20 years
Darwin has 2/3 of the Territories population
NT is ours now
K?
Shows 7 clubs with no more than 15 senior mens teams in total
http://www.foxsportspulse.com/assoc_pag ... -0&a=COMPS
Shows 17 clubs with 29 senior mens teams in total
Its worth noting that an AFL side has at least 5 more players per team compared to RL
Thats playing u wanker
Eyes on games n on tv .. its all NRL
RL is a hard intimidating game to play
While any stick insect can fumble bumble n miss
Darwin is ours
So is the NT
Ch 9Xman wrote:LOLRaiderdave wrote:AhhXman wrote:http://www.sportingpulse.com/assoc_page ... -0&a=COMPSRaiderdave wrote:in the remote communities maybeBeaussie wrote:Ask any Aboriginal up there and they'll tell ya its AFL heartland. I really love their passion for the game in NT.
but Ask any city dwelling Koori or non Aboriginal & they'll tell you it isn't wanker
RL rules Darwin these days with huge numbers of easterners/nthners moving there in the last 20 years
Darwin has 2/3 of the Territories population
NT is ours now
K?
Shows 7 clubs with no more than 15 senior mens teams in total
http://www.foxsportspulse.com/assoc_pag ... -0&a=COMPS
Shows 17 clubs with 29 senior mens teams in total
Its worth noting that an AFL side has at least 5 more players per team compared to RL
Thats playing u wanker
Eyes on games n on tv .. its all NRL
RL is a hard intimidating game to play
While any stick insect can fumble bumble n miss
Darwin is ours
So is the NT
I provided figures, how about you try? Until then AFL is the clear winner
The_Wookie wrote:Well then we should take touch numbers out then. AMIRITERaiderdave wrote:Again for our
Slow
Dim witted
Deluded
****** fumblers
Playing numbers mean next to nothing
Sooker is the proof
Most players
Least interest
A game that is soft n easy to play will always have more players then a game that is hard & intimidating like RL
People love RL.. but they cant play it.. its too physical n rough for them.
It doesnt mean it isnt the most popular sport
In the NT
It is
Thanks for coming fumblers
Thanks
For coming
Like usual, you've got nothing at all.
Other then channel 9 deciding to put the NRL on ahead of the bumbles n fumbles in so called aflol heartland ?The_Wookie wrote:You've got no other figures have you though? I mean any figures at all. Just anything that supports anything you say.