Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

AFLsforPussies wrote:

And AFL never will have another nation playing their game. Will always be just some AFL expat putting a few randoms together in foreign country and saying yep AFL is huge in Africa. We have a league of 10 players. :_<>

who cares? Im sure the NFL dont care their game hasnt spread to other nations

:_<>
Another fumbler comparing his .. silly.. little sport to the NFL

The NFL is king from coast to coast in the wealthiest country on earth with a population of 330 million people

The vflol is outrated by cartoons in the larger half of Australia

But sure
they're the same :_<>

NFL is the dominant football code in the US, and doesnt need to spread internationally to prove itself. The AFL is the dominant code in Australia and also doesnt need to spread to other nations to justify itself

Xman wrote:

NFL is the dominant football code in the US, and doesnt need to spread internationally to prove itself. The AFL is the dominant code in Australia and also doesnt need to spread to other nations to justify itself

:_<>
Dominant code in Australia ?

It cant outrate the tellie tubbies in half of it
Thats not dominant you deluded fuckwit :_<>

Tell me
Would the flintstones outrate the NFL anywhere in the USA ?

This bumbling vicderpian abortion is ... dominant ..in the smaller.. retarted .. half of Australia

It is irelevant in the larger half
That is a fact.

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

NFL is the dominant football code in the US, and doesnt need to spread internationally to prove itself. The AFL is the dominant code in Australia and also doesnt need to spread to other nations to justify itself

:_<>
Dominant code in Australia ?

It cant outrate the tellie tubbies in half of it
Thats not dominant you deluded fuckwit :_<>

Tell me
Would the flintstones outrate the NFL anywhere in the USA ?

it is more dominant than any other football code, thats the facts. Even you cant deny that

Xman wrote:

it is more dominant than any other football code, thats the facts. Even you cant deny that[/quote]

In the nthn states you fucking ****** ?
Is it dominant there
No wanker!
Its not dominant at all

Its a fucking joke
Even you cant deny that

it doesnt matter that the game isnt number one in every single area, it matters that it is clearly the most popular game in Australia overall. That is all

Xman wrote:

it doesnt matter that the game isnt number one in every single area, it matters that it is clearly the most popular game in Australia overall. That is all

:_<>
Lets examine your spasticity shall we

Australia .. overall

Now answer me this
Is your bumbling little abortion most popular in
Australia overall ?
Because Australia overall is just that
All of it

It is clearly not .. most popular in
Australia overall
Because in half of it. It is not only .. not most popular
It isnt 2nd most popular
Or even 3rd

:_<>

Now is it ?

Australia overall indeed :_<>

There is no sport on earth that proclaims numb 1 status in a nation ...
Yet in a part of it is 4th most popular
& in Australia .. it isnt a part of it

Its fucking half of it

:_<>

Facts:
- over double the average crowd of its nearest rival
- Over 3 times the members of its nearest rival
- almost double the revenue of its nearest rival

These arent close figures, theyre overwhelming dominance

Sure, the AFL isnt number 1 in aevery area, no football code is. But it is by far and away the number 1 overall

Xman wrote:

Facts:
- over double the average crowd of its nearest rival
- Over 3 times the members of its nearest rival
- almost double the revenue of its nearest rival

These arent close figures, theyre overwhelming dominance

Sure, the AFL isnt number 1 in aevery area, no football code is. But it is by far and away the number 1 overall

Facts... 4th most popular winter sport in the larger half of Australia
&
Theres only 4 anyway :_<>
A joke
Near irelevant ...
And Almost exclusively Followed in the larger half by ex pat dribblers from the smaller half

Dominant
In the smaller half only

Numb one
In the smaller half only

No other sport on earth that claims to be dominant
Is completely dominanted itself in half of a country like the vflol is here by RL

Australia has no dominant football code nationally
Because no football code dominates nationally

if your claim about the AFL dominating in the smaller half of the country is true why do the AFL have:
- over double the average crowd of its nearest rival
- Over 3 times the members of its nearest rival
- almost double the revenue of its nearest rival

explain that one

Xman wrote:

if your claim about the AFL dominating in the smaller half of the country is true why do the AFL have:
- over double the average crowd of its nearest rival
- Over 3 times the members of its nearest rival
- almost double the revenue of its nearest rival

explain that one

I dont know &.. I dont care
No one up here does
All i know is their dominance is restricted to the sthn states
They cannot claim .. national.. dominance as a result because they do not have it.

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

if your claim about the AFL dominating in the smaller half of the country is true why do the AFL have:
- over double the average crowd of its nearest rival
- Over 3 times the members of its nearest rival
- almost double the revenue of its nearest rival

explain that one

I dont know &.. I dont care
No one up here does
All i know is their dominance is restricted to the sthn states
They cannot claim .. national.. dominance as a result because they do not have it.

'I dont know' or 'I dont want to know'

Again, the game doesnt have to be number 1 in every region to be number 1 overall. With such dominant figures over its nearest rival, due to its overwhelming strength in its heartland, it is clearly the number 1 football code in Australia

lol .
Fumbler logic