Re: AFL Women's Match to be Broadcast on Channel 7
Posted: Sun May 03, 2015 8:37 pm
LolXman wrote:nice deflection. Care to tell me which is the athlete?
www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
LolXman wrote:nice deflection. Care to tell me which is the athlete?
well its you basement dwellers usually talking about the physiques of the playersAFLsforPussies wrote:Xman what is your obsession with shirtless men? Is this an AFL fan thing??Xman wrote:AFLsforPussies wrote:Man anyone looks fat next to an AFL stick figure lol
Just admit it Mr Essendon. You have been with this guy a few times playing with your peptides.![]()
who looks more athletic?
You seem to like the black men yeah?
![]()
![]()
Fine if you swing that way but I would rather look at NRL cheerleaders. Something AFL banned for some reason.
Well as far as I can see, they are two shirtless blackmen that seem to excite you.Xman wrote:nice deflection. Care to tell me which is the athlete?
excite? No. Im amused at the differenceAFLsforPussies wrote:Well as far as I can see, they are two shirtless blackmen that seem to excite you.Xman wrote:nice deflection. Care to tell me which is the athlete?
the AFL player was a kid and didnt actually play a single AFL game. Nice tryAFLcrap1 wrote:LolXman wrote:nice deflection. Care to tell me which is the athlete?
Xman anyone can show the worst out of shape player in one code next to the fittest in another.Xman wrote:the AFL player was a kid and didnt actually play a single AFL game. Nice tryAFLcrap1 wrote:LolXman wrote:nice deflection. Care to tell me which is the athlete?
the Rexona challlenge grossly advantages smaller athletes which is why smaller athletes like Slater won so often, and why larger bodied athletes like Tukiri and Sailor who were also RL/RU stars came near bottom. The AFL also made the mistake of selecting larger players, not small nimble athletes. Therefore its irrelevantAFLsforPussies wrote:Xman anyone can show the worst out of shape player in one code next to the fittest in another.Xman wrote:the AFL player was a kid and didnt actually play a single AFL game. Nice tryAFLcrap1 wrote:LolXman wrote:nice deflection. Care to tell me which is the athlete?
At the end of the day there is no skill in having a goal kicking area bigger than any other code of football without even a crossbar and being able to fumble a ball and not catch it without being penalised. That pretty much sums up AFL.![]()
By the way, hasn't Rexona sportsman competions nearly always ended up with NRL players beating AFL players??
Puts a lot of holes in your arguement.
If confronted one on one in wrestling, boxing, tackling, 95-100% of all muscular strength tests, weightlifting, grip strength, and most other athletic tests jamal idris would flog the AFL lad in the image.Xman wrote:nice deflection. Care to tell me which is the athlete?
silliest post on the forum, well done dickbrainKing-Eliagh wrote:If confronted one on one in wrestling, boxing, tackling, 95-100% of all muscular strength tests, weightlifting, grip strength, and most other athletic tests jamal idris would flog the AFL lad in the image.Xman wrote:nice deflection. Care to tell me which is the athlete?
If confronted one on one the AFL lad would win trotting and the vertical leap.
Unfortunately between these two, they're not even on being investigated for sexual assault. AFL loses that count too.
Excuses Excuses lolXman wrote:the Rexona challlenge grossly advantages smaller athletes which is why smaller athletes like Slater won so often, and why larger bodied athletes like Tukiri and Sailor who were also RL/RU stars came near bottom. The AFL also made the mistake of selecting larger players, not small nimble athletes. Therefore its irrelevantAFLsforPussies wrote:Xman anyone can show the worst out of shape player in one code next to the fittest in another.Xman wrote:the AFL player was a kid and didnt actually play a single AFL game. Nice tryAFLcrap1 wrote:LolXman wrote:nice deflection. Care to tell me which is the athlete?
At the end of the day there is no skill in having a goal kicking area bigger than any other code of football without even a crossbar and being able to fumble a ball and not catch it without being penalised. That pretty much sums up AFL.![]()
By the way, hasn't Rexona sportsman competions nearly always ended up with NRL players beating AFL players??
Puts a lot of holes in your arguement.
The ease of scoring is also irrelevant because the contest is about who scores the most out of the opportunities presented. The ease of scoring makes for a higher scoring game which is fine by me
Ya was a good match, probably out rate every a league game this year bar their grand final, but but but in 20 yearsleeroy*NRL* wrote:Who cares
womens
Aus v nz in rugby league is on tv now
Ch 9
haha too true.ParraEelsNRL wrote:Ya was a good match, probably out rate every a league game this year bar their grand final, but but but in 20 yearsleeroy*NRL* wrote:Who cares
womens
Aus v nz in rugby league is on tv now
Ch 9
ParraEelsNRL wrote:Ya was a good match, probably out rate every a league game this year bar their grand final, but but but in 20 yearsleeroy*NRL* wrote:Who cares
womens
Aus v nz in rugby league is on tv now
Ch 9