Talking Footy

Their is no defence to reward someone missing .
& they miss a goal that is far far far bigger than any other football code .
There is no crossbar to get over or stay under .

Just 2 giant sticks that they seem to miss quite a lot .

Imagine if in sccer there were two lil keeper less goals on the outside :_<>

Lol .

AFLcrap1 wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

10 pin bowling you score despite missing a strike. Darts you can score without missing your main target. Cricket you can score without even hitting the ball.

Every game has unique facets relating to scoring,

Lol grasping at straws .
None of those you mentioned are FOOTBALL codes .
Lol
Only one footy code has a reward for being UNCO..

& just because I can I will amuse myself .
how retaaarded you are .

Ten pin bowling .lol

There are ten pins to knock down .
You don't get an unco point for a gutter ball .

and you dont get a score if you miss the scoring zone in the AFL. derp

as i said, the argument is moronic because its about who scores the most. Not surprising you fools cant see it

=D>

Nlol! Nlol! Nlol!

Thanks for the laughs nlol! Your inability to defend the extra posts with a valid argument has been bloomin hilarious! =D>

theres nothing to defend. its a unique part of the most popular game in Australia

That's better!

So now you say it's "unique" when before you bumbled and fumbled ur way thru countless mentally embarrassing examples making us all laugh at you.

Yes, it's unique. There's nuttin else quite like it in team sports worldwide.

King-Eliagh wrote:

That's better!

So now you say it's "unique" when before you bumbled and fumbled ur way thru countless mentally embarrassing examples making us all laugh at you.

Yes, it's unique. There's nuttin else quite like it in team sports worldwide.

not exactly like it no, but theres certainly other games where you can win a game by missing your ideal target. but as wookie said, the proof is the popularity and its Australias no1 game for a reason

Reverting to wookies pathetic call now are yA?

I smashed that with nascar crowds. You think nascar takes more skill than yer AFL teams?

Both rugby codes are easier to score points. I mean, haven't you seen how wide the in-goal area is? Wider than the wing span of an A380 Airbus! Whew!!

Most goals in rugby are kicked as a reward for scoring a try.

Kinda like getting a kiss from your mother for being good, really.

The_Wookie wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

You have absolutely no reason not to believe. In case you hadn't noticed, we've only met on an Internet forum called the fight club bro

It can only be jealousy

that never stopped you judging others. Hypocrite.

Now now now me frumpy admin bitch, that's just not right and I won't have you misleading our members.

On this site I judge folk by their moral and ethical standing and on whether they are misleading the membership. Now if they're telling someone they're running a mine or if they wear pink backpacks to baseball training or if they say they umpire marngrook. Thats their personal life and I really have no evidence to refute so I believe em. And these are just a few real examples where instead of being jealous like you wookie, I took our members personal sharing aa gospel.

I really hope u can get rid of this scourge of jealousy you have wook. It's a real stain on ur character you know

Brucey ur late to the argument champ but tell me. When an AFL player lines up to shoot for goal after he's taken a 'catch' (let's be honest, that's what the queens english tells us it should be called) are their 13 players who would do anything to stop the player scoring?

The fact it's a free shot at goal after a 'catch' completely negates ur argument re the wide scoring zone in rl my friend.

Now please , try again

King-Eliagh wrote:

Brucey ur late to the argument champ but tell me. When an AFL player lines up to shoot for goal after he's taken a 'catch' (let's be honest, that's what the queens english tells us it should be called) are their 13 players who would do anything to stop the player scoring?

The fact it's a free shot at goal after a 'catch' completely negates ur argument re the wide scoring zone in rl my friend.

Now please , try again

"queen's English"???
Crikey! Now I understand your problem King. You harbour deep visceral yearnings to return to the home country. And you want to drag the rest of us with you.
Since when have Aussies spoken the Queen's English?
An early editor of the Sydney Gazette in the 1820s, Horatio Wills (now, there's a larrikin you should get to know) , acknowledged that Australian English was diverging from what you call the queens English, and that was only three decades after European settlers arrived.

Oh, and it was NSW-born Tom, Horatio Will's son, who called called it a 'mark'. He was never one to slavishly follow the English.

BruceOfRedfernNSW wrote:

Most goals in rugby are kicked as a reward for scoring a try.

Kinda like getting a kiss from your mother for being good, really.

Yes as a reward for beating the defence of your opposition For being skilful enough to get past them & score
Not as a consolation for being UNCO & missing ,2 giant sticks .

To put it simply .
A reward for being skilful as opposed to a consolation because you kick like a ****** .


There's a big difference .
But as a Fumblefan you won't see that