National Rugby League is not National

Which is the best football code? Here you can have it out with other football fans.
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Posts: 16700
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: National Rugby League is not National

Post by Raiderdave »

sydneyfc wrote:
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Two of the four so-called biggest football codes in the country don't even have a team in the Nations capital, for shame and National my arse!
at this rate the waiders wont be around for too much longer if they cant keep up with rental payments

get the eviction notice ready :lol:
More revenue then the entire oi league

Every
single
Year

Could buy the greazy wanker comp out tomorrow :cool:


But
Why would they buy a comp that cant outrate womens cricket :_<> :(/ :lol: :_<>
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
sydneyfc
Coach
Coach
Posts: 1804
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2014 7:01 pm
Team: Sydney FC
Location: Sydney
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: National Rugby League is not National

Post by sydneyfc »

#74milindabank
User avatar
King-Eliagh
Coach
Coach
Posts: 13126
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
Team: Parramatta
Location:
Has thanked: 16 times
Been liked: 11 times

Re: National Rugby League is not National

Post by King-Eliagh »

I don't profess to know the ins and outs of the governance of the NRL but I would suggest its international.

The oi league could be fairly aptly be called the "minority of the minority's league" or probably more accurate to say "the minority of the minority of the minority's league". Or simply "the code for wanking males with inferiority complexes"... or perhaps "national mens wimpball". Just sayin, the a-league is unoriginal and inaccurate.

Thoughts? :)
Image

xman wrote:
KE, why is an even comp important?
User avatar
post_hoc
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2256
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:09 pm
Team: Western Sydney Wanderers
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: National Rugby League is not National

Post by post_hoc »

yet the sport is played by 250 million people world wide, so not talking about watching talking about actual playing in organised comps.

KE_liar, more lies from you I see, god you are having a bad day and I haven't even had my coffee yet
Football in NSW
- Football 200,868
- AFL NSW/ACT 28,468
- Rugby League 96,041
- Rugby Union 40,685
Football has 22% more players than the other football codes combined
User avatar
King-Eliagh
Coach
Coach
Posts: 13126
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
Team: Parramatta
Location:
Has thanked: 16 times
Been liked: 11 times

Re: National Rugby League is not National

Post by King-Eliagh »

but but but

.... everywhere else :lol:
Image

xman wrote:
KE, why is an even comp important?
User avatar
post_hoc
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2256
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:09 pm
Team: Western Sydney Wanderers
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: National Rugby League is not National

Post by post_hoc »

but but but 104,000 people Rugby League in Australia, but but butLOL
Football in NSW
- Football 200,868
- AFL NSW/ACT 28,468
- Rugby League 96,041
- Rugby Union 40,685
Football has 22% more players than the other football codes combined
User avatar
King-Eliagh
Coach
Coach
Posts: 13126
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
Team: Parramatta
Location:
Has thanked: 16 times
Been liked: 11 times

Re: National Rugby League is not National

Post by King-Eliagh »

but... .... less than 104k bother to watch the oi league in Australia :lol:

"but but but...but but...everywhere else" :lol:

"but but but.. but KE's a big bad wiar" :lol:
Image

xman wrote:
KE, why is an even comp important?
User avatar
post_hoc
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2256
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:09 pm
Team: Western Sydney Wanderers
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: National Rugby League is not National

Post by post_hoc »

Year upon Year the A League is growing in number of viewers, in number of crowds at the game, in revenue in every metric, so long as we keep growing then it is good.

Our Socceroos are watched by Millions, and Aussie team won the Asian Champions league and was watched by 10's of millions of people, every sign is improving for Football, more people watched the Wanderers play than watched SOO and Grandfinal combined.

The sad sad fact is rugby League is number 1 in PNG and maybe a few other pacific countries. In over 100 years you can only manage 104,000 people playing your game in Australia.
Football in NSW
- Football 200,868
- AFL NSW/ACT 28,468
- Rugby League 96,041
- Rugby Union 40,685
Football has 22% more players than the other football codes combined
User avatar
King-Eliagh
Coach
Coach
Posts: 13126
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
Team: Parramatta
Location:
Has thanked: 16 times
Been liked: 11 times

Re: National Rugby League is not National

Post by King-Eliagh »

in Australia which for your info posthoc is where the wanderers are based, 99.68% of the country didn't bother watching what was touted as one of the most historic important games in Australian soccer history! :(/

The insignificance is ginormous! :lol:
Image

xman wrote:
KE, why is an even comp important?
User avatar
post_hoc
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2256
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:09 pm
Team: Western Sydney Wanderers
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: National Rugby League is not National

Post by post_hoc »

what I find funny is the 113,000 people that watched the Wanderers on TV and claimed to be such low number by KE_liar is still 9,000 more people than play Rugby League in the entire country.

So, if 99.68% of the country didn't bother watching, then slightly more number of people couldn't be bothered to pick up a rugby league ball and run into a meathead.
Football in NSW
- Football 200,868
- AFL NSW/ACT 28,468
- Rugby League 96,041
- Rugby Union 40,685
Football has 22% more players than the other football codes combined
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Posts: 16700
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: National Rugby League is not National

Post by Raiderdave »

post_hoc wrote:
yet the sport is played by 250 million people world wide, so not talking about watching talking about actual playing in organised comps.

KE_liar, more lies from you I see, god you are having a bad day and I haven't even had my coffee yet

But but but
Everywhere else 8-[

:_<> :(/ :lol:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Posts: 16700
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: National Rugby League is not National

Post by Raiderdave »

post_hoc wrote:
what I find funny is the 113,000 people that watched the Wanderers on TV and claimed to be such low number by KE_liar is still 9,000 more people than play Rugby League in the entire country.

So, if 99.68% of the country didn't bother watching, then slightly more number of people couldn't be bothered to pick up a rugby league ball and run into a meathead.
1.8 million play RL & its other variants in this country you stupid lying raider :_<> :(/ :lol:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
ParraEelsNRL
Coach
Coach
Posts: 9498
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
Team: Parramatta
Location: Rugby League Heartland
Has thanked: 14 times
Been liked: 9 times

Re: National Rugby League is not National

Post by ParraEelsNRL »

Yeah well wimps need not apply for RL, they have sokka.

Even those stick insects that play victorian rulez have more masculinity than all sokka players combined. The hardest part about sokka is the jumping up and down on seats while facing the wrong way then heading off after a match to have a fight down a dark alley somewhere pretending you are part of the movie franchise called green street poofs.
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User avatar
King-Eliagh
Coach
Coach
Posts: 13126
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
Team: Parramatta
Location:
Has thanked: 16 times
Been liked: 11 times

Re: National Rugby League is not National

Post by King-Eliagh »

post_hoc wrote:
what I find funny is the 113,000 people that watched the Wanderers on TV and claimed to be such low number by KE_liar is still 9,000 more people than play Rugby League in the entire country.

So, if 99.68% of the country didn't bother watching, then slightly more number of people couldn't be bothered to pick up a rugby league ball and run into a meathead.
A flawed assessment, as is pretty much all of your assessments. The sooker was available for all to watch and I recall much less than the 113k you nominated bothered to watch the most important game in Australian history apparently. I think it was more like 47k right? Less than the Aussie womens cricket side manages :lol: ...the bioggest game in aus soccer history...less than a womens cricket match :lol: its just astounding really.

So yes the sooker was available to the whole bloody nation, old young female male hermaphrodites dwarfs amputees anorexics rich poor you get the picture ;) Whereas to participate as a RL player? Well we know the ABS calls for their participant data to be current i.e. someone who played five years ago aint saying he's playing it in the most current census. This takes out pretty much the whole pop over 50 or say 8million. We know a high percentage of females aint keen on it. So for the under 50 females there goes another 6 or so million. We know you cant play it until you're about 5 or 6. There goes another 2million. We know that thai ladyboys and other men who don't have much physical strength don't go near it so there goes another 2 million. We know Victorians aint that keen on it because they like AFL. There goes another 2 million.

So yeah. Its a more demanding and difficult code to enter so really out of those who physically can, we got massive numbers.

Sooker on the other hand? It's considered 'safe'. And it is. The whole country under 60 can play it and yes they get decent numbers which is great but id have a well educated guess and say 70% of those who participate in sooker prefer to watch RL or marngrook on the tele :lol:

Poor sooker. It's never gunna be big here.
Image

xman wrote:
KE, why is an even comp important?
User avatar
post_hoc
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2256
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:09 pm
Team: Western Sydney Wanderers
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: National Rugby League is not National

Post by post_hoc »

KE_liar, wrong again, or was that more lies, the ACL was played on Foxtel only so not available to all, only available to those with a Foxtel subscription AND the sports package LOL, so why do you keep lying, your name really suits you.
Football in NSW
- Football 200,868
- AFL NSW/ACT 28,468
- Rugby League 96,041
- Rugby Union 40,685
Football has 22% more players than the other football codes combined
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 2 guests