Talking Footy

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Haha the only weakness in his game the fella says.

Fmd, doesn't he get paid to kick frigging goals?

Yet it's his biggest weakness

AFL logic

He does, and giving them to his team mates. He gets his goals by getting as many shots at goal as possible, not by getting a few chances and being the most accurate.

To funny KE,

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Haha the only weakness in his game the fella says.

Fmd, doesn't he get paid to kick frigging goals?

Yet it's his biggest weakness

AFL logic

Clowns who haven't slept for weeks is what we are dealing with here. Seriously, khunt wasn't even picked to kick goals yet his % would be equal to and higher than many AFL players in his position. it's true folks, I don't lie

NlolRL wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Sorry but I just checked buddy franklins stats. Many of his seasons avg out at about a 60% success rating. Khunt at 50% is not far off one of the AFL's greatest

http://afltables.com/AFL/stats/players/ ... nklin.html

Kicking at goal is probably Franklin's only weakness in his game, not to mention he usually goes for low percentage shots from 80m out on the run. Yet his accuracy is 10% higher than one of RL's better players.

Says it all actually. Cheers

It sure does, that is pathetic. Let me get this straight.

So your main skill in AFL is to kick the ball straight and accurate. You have players like BF who is suppose to be one of the best. His job is to score goals, but he only hit 6 out of every 10. wow, it sure does say a lot.

As for the KMH comment. How about you go back through some of the threads in here where you were all saying he was god, before you contradict your fellow AFL boys any further.

King-Eliagh wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Haha the only weakness in his game the fella says.

Fmd, doesn't he get paid to kick frigging goals?

Yet it's his biggest weakness

AFL logic

Clowns who haven't slept for weeks is what we are dealing with here. Seriously, khunt wasn't even picked to kick goals yet his % would be equal to and higher than many AFLs players in his position. it's true folks, I don't lie

I thought the skills were easy. Wouldnt he be far better? >

:_<>

Dogs wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Sorry but I just checked buddy franklins stats. Many of his seasons avg out at about a 60% success rating. Khunt at 50% is not far off one of the AFL's greatest

http://afltables.com/AFL/stats/players/ ... nklin.html

Kicking at goal is probably Franklin's only weakness in his game, not to mention he usually goes for low percentage shots from 80m out on the run. Yet his accuracy is 10% higher than one of RL's better players.

Says it all actually. Cheers

It sure does, that is pathetic. Let me get this straight.

So your main skill in AFL is to kick the ball straight and accurate. You have players like BF who is suppose to be one of the best. His job is to score goals, but he only hit 6 out of every 10. wow, it sure does say a lot.

As for the KMH comment. How about you go back through some of the threads in here where you were all saying he was god, before you contradict your fellow AFL boys any further.

Plus factor in how hard it is to kick a goal in AFL compared to other sports.

You have 2 giant sticks to get through.
No crossbar to get over ,or in soccers case under .
& their are 2 unco sticks on the side for when these tards keep missing.

Dogs wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Sorry but I just checked buddy franklins stats. Many of his seasons avg out at about a 60% success rating. Khunt at 50% is not far off one of the AFL's greatest

http://afltables.com/AFL/stats/players/ ... nklin.html

Kicking at goal is probably Franklin's only weakness in his game, not to mention he usually goes for low percentage shots from 80m out on the run. Yet his accuracy is 10% higher than one of RL's better players.

Says it all actually. Cheers

It sure does, that is pathetic. Let me get this straight.

So your main skill in AFL is to kick the ball straight and accurate. You have players like BF who is suppose to be one of the best. His job is to score goals, but he only hit 6 out of every 10. wow, it sure does say a lot.

As for the KMH comment. How about you go back through some of the threads in here where you were all saying he was god, before you contradict your fellow AFL boys any further.

BF excels at almost every skill. Hes increadibly balanced, fast, agile, has great endurance, can out mark almost anyone. But his kicking is hot and cold. When he's hot he kicks unbelievable goals as we've seen this year. When he's cold he misses many. Fact is he gets so many opportunities due to his talent that he's still the most effective forward going round.

As for his inaccuracy, he doesn't merely kick set shots from 20m out. His shots are from anywhere within 70m and on the run.

KH was never a God, he was a good ordinary player at best. Despite the fact he was a RL star his accuracy kicking at goal was amongst the worst in the AFL

Says it all

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Dogs wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Sorry but I just checked buddy franklins stats. Many of his seasons avg out at about a 60% success rating. Khunt at 50% is not far off one of the AFL's greatest

http://afltables.com/AFL/stats/players/ ... nklin.html

Kicking at goal is probably Franklin's only weakness in his game, not to mention he usually goes for low percentage shots from 80m out on the run. Yet his accuracy is 10% higher than one of RL's better players.

Says it all actually. Cheers

It sure does, that is pathetic. Let me get this straight.

So your main skill in AFL is to kick the ball straight and accurate. You have players like BF who is suppose to be one of the best. His job is to score goals, but he only hit 6 out of every 10. wow, it sure does say a lot.

As for the KMH comment. How about you go back through some of the threads in here where you were all saying he was god, before you contradict your fellow AFL boys any further.

Plus factor in how hard it is to kick a goal in AFL compared to other sports.

You have 2 giant sticks to get through.
No crossbar to get over ,or in soccers case under .
& their are 2 unco sticks on the side for when these tards keep missing.

How many shots at a soccer goal actually score? Few if any.

The cross bar argument is rubbish anyway. Almost every set shot in AFL needs to clear 10 foot to get over players on the line.

How many shots at goal are during "play" in RL? Few if any, and most attempts miss.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Dogs wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Sorry but I just checked buddy franklins stats. Many of his seasons avg out at about a 60% success rating. Khunt at 50% is not far off one of the AFL's greatest

http://afltables.com/AFL/stats/players/ ... nklin.html

Kicking at goal is probably Franklin's only weakness in his game, not to mention he usually goes for low percentage shots from 80m out on the run. Yet his accuracy is 10% higher than one of RL's better players.

Says it all actually. Cheers

It sure does, that is pathetic. Let me get this straight.

So your main skill in AFL is to kick the ball straight and accurate. You have players like BF who is suppose to be one of the best. His job is to score goals, but he only hit 6 out of every 10. wow, it sure does say a lot.

As for the KMH comment. How about you go back through some of the threads in here where you were all saying he was god, before you contradict your fellow AFL boys any further.

Plus factor in how hard it is to kick a goal in AFL compared to other sports.

You have 2 giant sticks to get through.
No crossbar to get over ,or in soccers case under .
& their are 2 unco sticks on the side for when these tards keep missing.

Am I correct that there is nearly 20m from one miss post to the other miss post. If that is correct, that really puts in perspective how bad it is when they miss. Should be damn near impossible to miss, with or without pressure on you whilst your kicking.

So you miss a 6.4m opening, you get a chance at another point in another 6.4m opening either side and these jokers whos main skill is to kick the ball straight still miss. oh my :_<> . As I said before, KE this is too funny.

Dogs wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Dogs wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Sorry but I just checked buddy franklins stats. Many of his seasons avg out at about a 60% success rating. Khunt at 50% is not far off one of the AFL's greatest

http://afltables.com/AFL/stats/players/ ... nklin.html

Kicking at goal is probably Franklin's only weakness in his game, not to mention he usually goes for low percentage shots from 80m out on the run. Yet his accuracy is 10% higher than one of RL's better players.

Says it all actually. Cheers

It sure does, that is pathetic. Let me get this straight.

So your main skill in AFL is to kick the ball straight and accurate. You have players like BF who is suppose to be one of the best. His job is to score goals, but he only hit 6 out of every 10. wow, it sure does say a lot.

As for the KMH comment. How about you go back through some of the threads in here where you were all saying he was god, before you contradict your fellow AFL boys any further.

Plus factor in how hard it is to kick a goal in AFL compared to other sports.

You have 2 giant sticks to get through.
No crossbar to get over ,or in soccers case under .
& their are 2 unco sticks on the side for when these tards keep missing.

Am I correct that there is nearly 20m from one miss post to the other miss post. If that is correct, that really puts in perspective how bad it is when they miss. Should be damn near impossible to miss, with or without pressure on you whilst your kicking.

So you miss a 6.4m opening, you get a chance at another point in another 6.4m opening either side and these jokers whos main skill is to kick the ball straight still miss. oh my :_<> . As I said before, KE this is too funny.

What are you comparing to? A sport where almost all shots at goal are set shots under no time pressure from 20m away?
>

NlolRL wrote:

Dogs wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Dogs wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Sorry but I just checked buddy franklins stats. Many of his seasons avg out at about a 60% success rating. Khunt at 50% is not far off one of the AFL's greatest

http://afltables.com/AFL/stats/players/ ... nklin.html

Kicking at goal is probably Franklin's only weakness in his game, not to mention he usually goes for low percentage shots from 80m out on the run. Yet his accuracy is 10% higher than one of RL's better players.

Says it all actually. Cheers

It sure does, that is pathetic. Let me get this straight.

So your main skill in AFL is to kick the ball straight and accurate. You have players like BF who is suppose to be one of the best. His job is to score goals, but he only hit 6 out of every 10. wow, it sure does say a lot.

As for the KMH comment. How about you go back through some of the threads in here where you were all saying he was god, before you contradict your fellow AFL boys any further.

Plus factor in how hard it is to kick a goal in AFL compared to other sports.

You have 2 giant sticks to get through.
No crossbar to get over ,or in soccers case under .
& their are 2 unco sticks on the side for when these tards keep missing.

Am I correct that there is nearly 20m from one miss post to the other miss post. If that is correct, that really puts in perspective how bad it is when they miss. Should be damn near impossible to miss, with or without pressure on you whilst your kicking.

So you miss a 6.4m opening, you get a chance at another point in another 6.4m opening either side and these jokers whos main skill is to kick the ball straight still miss. oh my :_<> . As I said before, KE this is too funny.

What are you comparing to? A sport where almost all shots at goal are set shots under no time pressure from 20m away?
>

Lets see where this goes, how about soccer where again the main skill is to kick accurately at a post. How often do you think those guys would miss if the posts were that big and to make it harder they cant use their hands. Point closed I would say

Sheeezus, so it's been admitted khunt has a better goal avg, and he does, than many other players who've strived hard all their lives, 1000's upon thousands if practice and the best coaches in the world to coach em, and then some rl bloke comes up, kicks his first goal on the buzzer to win the game and has a goal kicking % higher than heaps of those blokes who've played all their lives and reached the highest level?

:_<>

And at the same time khunt is generally lauded as shite! what does that make all those below him? Seriously, the skills should be better

There's no two ways about it folks, the khunt and iZy experiments have been a hilarious debacle and waste of moolah, whichever way you look at it

King-Eliagh wrote:

Sheeezus, so it's been admitted khunt has a better goal avg, and he does, than many other players who've strived hard all their lives, 1000's upon thousands if practice and the best coaches in the world to coach em, and then some rl bloke comes up, kicks his first goal on the buzzer to win the game and has a goal kicking % higher than heaps of those blokes who've played all their lives and reached the highest level?

:_<>

And at the same time khunt is generally lauded as shite! what does that make all those below him? Seriously, the skills should be better

There's no two ways about it folks, the khunt and iZy experiments have been a hilarious debacle and waste of moolah, whichever way you look at it

Haha, he averages 50%. Have you posted any averages worse yet?

Dogs wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

Dogs wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Dogs wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Sorry but I just checked buddy franklins stats. Many of his seasons avg out at about a 60% success rating. Khunt at 50% is not far off one of the AFL's greatest

http://afltables.com/AFL/stats/players/ ... nklin.html

Kicking at goal is probably Franklin's only weakness in his game, not to mention he usually goes for low percentage shots from 80m out on the run. Yet his accuracy is 10% higher than one of RL's better players.

Says it all actually. Cheers

It sure does, that is pathetic. Let me get this straight.

So your main skill in AFL is to kick the ball straight and accurate. You have players like BF who is suppose to be one of the best. His job is to score goals, but he only hit 6 out of every 10. wow, it sure does say a lot.

As for the KMH comment. How about you go back through some of the threads in here where you were all saying he was god, before you contradict your fellow AFL boys any further.

Plus factor in how hard it is to kick a goal in AFL compared to other sports.

You have 2 giant sticks to get through.
No crossbar to get over ,or in soccers case under .
& their are 2 unco sticks on the side for when these tards keep missing.

Am I correct that there is nearly 20m from one miss post to the other miss post. If that is correct, that really puts in perspective how bad it is when they miss. Should be damn near impossible to miss, with or without pressure on you whilst your kicking.

So you miss a 6.4m opening, you get a chance at another point in another 6.4m opening either side and these jokers whos main skill is to kick the ball straight still miss. oh my :_<> . As I said before, KE this is too funny.

What are you comparing to? A sport where almost all shots at goal are set shots under no time pressure from 20m away?
>

Lets see where this goes, how about soccer where again the main skill is to kick accurately at a post. How often do you think those guys would miss if the posts were that big and to make it harder they cant use their hands. Point closed I would say

Who knows? I was answering a claim that other sports are more accurate. Id love to see evidence. All I see is the majority of shots at goal in soccer are off target despite the fact they are kicked from fairly close range

NlolRL wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Sheeezus, so it's been admitted khunt has a better goal avg, and he does, than many other players who've strived hard all their lives, 1000's upon thousands if practice and the best coaches in the world to coach em, and then some rl bloke comes up, kicks his first goal on the buzzer to win the game and has a goal kicking % higher than heaps of those blokes who've played all their lives and reached the highest level?

:_<>

And at the same time khunt is generally lauded as shite! what does that make all those below him? Seriously, the skills should be better

There's no two ways about it folks, the khunt and iZy experiments have been a hilarious debacle and waste of moolah, whichever way you look at it

Haha, he averages 50%. Have you posted any averages worse yet?

would you like me to?