Talking Footy

Swans4ever wrote:

And what the regionals in NSW don't watch AFL even in the Riverina??? You make me laugh your so stupid paralytic!!

its you're
you illiterate reta.rded fuckwit :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>


have you served or not ? >

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

That's more people than watch them on TV in Sydney, well done.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

too true

is there any team on the planet , that claims to be numb 1
yet is watched by less people on TV then their attendances or their membership numbers :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>


Swines
only ahead of the Midgets & maybe the waratards for interest in NSW :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Yes the snot green dole Bludging Braiders!!! Hahaha oh the pain pissy pants!

ah no
the Raiders are watched by 4 times the number the Swines are in NSW .... hell , even NZ's team is far more popular
try again
you filthy spineless flea

Then was wookies break down have them SECOND last NATIONALLY - you dole Bludging, dog rooting piss soaked moron!!! Hahaha priceless!

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

And what the regionals in NSW don't watch AFL even in the Riverina??? You make me laugh your so stupid paralytic!!

its you're
you illiterate reta.rded fuckwit :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>


have you served or not ? >

Are you and the Braiders going to return the dole you filthy urine soaked dole bludger??

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

100k huh?

Like to see it proved seeing as you don't get a breakdown of Viewers only in Sydney on Pay TV, but you flogs keep pretending they do, it's quite funny esp seeing as the FTA audience is usually below 50k.

yeah, just keep adding all those viewers from regionals and other capital cities to the swans Pay TV figures.

Loons

They rated 80k on FTA last week, with a record 370k on fox. Are you claiming less than 20k of 370k were from Sydney? Lol

Cause I said you can't add them to Metro figures like you idiots do each week for the swans to prove some bullshit figure that doesn't exist.

Are you all there in the head, or are you getting confused because you can't keep up with what is being said?

I have a sneaking feeling that you idiots are sharing accounts for some reason here, that is the only possible explanation I can come up with for your stupidity and forgetfulness.

NlolRL wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

100k huh?

Like to see it proved seeing as you don't get a breakdown of Viewers only in Sydney on Pay TV, but you flogs keep pretending they do, it's quite funny esp seeing as the FTA audience is usually below 50k.

yeah, just keep adding all those viewers from regionals and other capital cities to the swans Pay TV figures.

Loons

They rated 80k on FTA last week, with a record 370k on fox. Are you claiming only 20k of 370k were from Sydney? Lol

Wow, no 100k on FTA yet Pay TV will have thousands watching

Wow.

80k on FTA tv on top of the ladder on a 12 game winning streak.

Haha.

I'd love to see you prove 20k were from Sydney watching on Pay TV.

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

And what the regionals in NSW don't watch AFL even in the Riverina??? You make me laugh your so stupid paralytic!!

its you're
you illiterate reta.rded fuckwit :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>


have you served or not ? >

Are you and the Braiders going to return the dole you filthy urine soaked dole bludger??

have you even been to school

serious question ?
I mean
you have the education level of a 12 year old :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>


a typical dumb Victardian fuck who can't even spell ... let alone argue with other adults
& of course theres the pathetic attempt at big noting

I served you claimed

why are you such a flea ? >

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Cause I said you can't add them to Metro figures like you idiots do each week for the swans to prove some bullshit figure that doesn't exist.

Are you all there in the head, or are you getting confused because you can't keep up with what is being said?

I have a sneaking feeling that you idiots are sharing accounts for some reason here, that is the only possible explanation I can come up with for your stupidity and forgetfulness.

So from a rating of 370k how many do you reckon were from Sydney? Be honest. Keep in Mind that Sydney were actually involved in the game,

So until you can Prove the figures for Pay TV in all of its cities, you have shit and hearsay.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

So until you can Prove the figures for Pay TV in all of its cities, you have shit and hearsay.

And common sense

How many Victorians would have watched their team?

When the storm get 300k on Pay TV, do you see RL fans saying they rated 300k in Melbourne?

No you don't, you don't hear shit because no one has the figures.

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

And what the regionals in NSW don't watch AFL even in the Riverina??? You make me laugh your so stupid paralytic!!

its you're
you illiterate reta.rded fuckwit :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>


have you served or not ? >

Are you and the Braiders going to return the dole you filthy urine soaked dole bludger??

have you even been to school

serious question ?
I mean
you have the education level of a 12 year old :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>


a typical dumb Victardian fuck who can't even spell ... let alone argue with other adults
& of course theres the pathetic attempt at big noting

I served you claimed

why are you such a flea ? >

Hahaha and have you worked or are you on a DSP because of your addiction to the pissy pants hot and frothy home brew? Fucking dole Bludging NUPHY!

NlolRL wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

100k huh?

Like to see it proved seeing as you don't get a breakdown of Viewers only in Sydney on Pay TV, but you flogs keep pretending they do, it's quite funny esp seeing as the FTA audience is usually below 50k.

yeah, just keep adding all those viewers from regionals and other capital cities to the swans Pay TV figures.

Loons

They rated 80k on FTA last week, with a record 370k on fox. Are you claiming less than 20k of 370k were from Sydney? Lol

& that was their biggest audience of the year
& up against no NRL on FTA in Sydney

as Parra said
it would have been closer to 50K normally .... telle tubbie ratings

again
keep up dopey :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

And what the regionals in NSW don't watch AFL even in the Riverina??? You make me laugh your so stupid paralytic!!

its you're
you illiterate reta.rded fuckwit :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>


have you served or not ? >

Are you and the Braiders going to return the dole you filthy urine soaked dole bludger??

have you even been to school

serious question ?
I mean
you have the education level of a 12 year old :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>


a typical dumb Victardian fuck who can't even spell ... let alone argue with other adults
& of course theres the pathetic attempt at big noting

I served you claimed

why are you such a flea ? >

Hahaha and have you worked or are you on a DSP because of your addiction to the pissy pants hot and frothy home brew? Fucking dole Bludging NUPHY!

so you maybe went to yr 8 then ?

you do realise you are illiterate don't you ?
& also a flea

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

How many Victorians would have watched their team?

When the storm get 300k on Pay TV, do you see RL fans saying they rated 300k in Melbourne?

No you don't, you don't hear shit because no one has the figures.

Can you show me where I said 300k were from Sydney? Are you really that fking illiterate? I said 100k including 80k from FTA. This would make the pay tv figure 20k, about 5% of the audience. Damn low given the game involved Sydney who have 40k members living in Sydney and the game was in Melbourne