Talking Footy

Truth hurts .

Well where are the figures on Newcastle then?

Cracker wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Cracker wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Cracker wrote:

It would be a whole lot better, but not really required of course, if you actually provided the correct figures, Raiderdave.

the correct figures ?

you mean any that portray an NRL club in a poor light
you filthy biased fumbler

No I mean any figure that proves you right, and paints the Knights in particular in a good light. No one can argue if you do that from a reliable source.

That will do me .
Posters can post heaps of figures,quotes,etc from reliable sources & you just ignore them.
Just look how you treat any source that Wookie posts.

Leaning towards going off topic. Back to Tinkler and Newcastle please.

yeah what hero tinkler is, with out his money, the knights would be 20odd million dollars in debt. how does this happen, with such a low operating revenue. living well beyond their means


there we have it AFL fans and bumsniffers we have the biggest financial basket case in Australian sport. the Newcastle Knights!

I would appreciate some proof of that claim, please.

Cracker wrote:

I would appreciate some proof of that claim, please.

what other club in Australia carries such big debt, with such low revenue. the penrith panthers are crawling in debt but at least have a decent cash flow to cover it
the lions carry the 12 odd million debt, but at least has a decent revenue flow.

That is not proof. That is opinion. To which of course you are entitled. And in The Fight Club you can expect people to ridicule you for it without proof.