Talking Footy

Yes you did. Your insinuations were obvious to all. And clean up your language.

Cracker wrote:

Yes you did. Your insinuations were obvious to all. And clean up your language.

Shove your clean language up your arse.
You are a fucking liar ,& you cannot show where I posted what you claim..

If I have something to say about derpball I will say it...


XMAN get this twit to retract his lie or its open slather.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Cracker wrote:

Yes you did. Your insinuations were obvious to all. And clean up your language.

Shove your clean language up your arse.
You are a fucking liar ,& you cannot show where I posted what you claim..

If I have something to say about derpball I will say it...


XMAN get this twit to retract his lie or its open slather.

He's claiming you insinuated, which is an opinion

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Cracker wrote:

Yes you did. Your insinuations were obvious to all. And clean up your language.

Shove your clean language up your arse.
You are a fucking liar ,& you cannot show where I posted what you claim..

If I have something to say about derpball I will say it...


XMAN get this twit to retract his lie or its open slather.

He's claiming you insinuated, which is an opinion

Are you blind.???


Read what he wrote.


Postby Cracker » Wed Apr 09, 2014 10:23 am

In order to be competitive, the NRL must follow the AFL's lead, AFLcrap1. It's all very well to state in effect that AFL players will have nothing when their career is over. They will have a healthy bank account that will allow them to start their own business. Some go into the media. The NRL should be allowing it's salary cap to rise so players can be encouraged to play the game full time and make money out of it. Having a second job can actually be a negative in terms of the time required in both areas. This is a distinct problem at the local level in Aussie Rules. I've seen it in Albury and I still see it where I live now.

You show me where I posted anything like what he claimed..
I did not mention the AFL.

I explained why a fringe 1st grader was working part time..

So by your rules I can say what I like about any post & say that ..
IN EFFECT.
or They were INSINUATING in my opinion..

He fucking stated that I said something ,.

Show me Xman in my post where I said anything like that..


So in future I will in my opinion ,say that Crackhead was INSINUATING that he likes to do things with dead animals in the privacy of his own bedroom...
Oh sorry ..

IN EFFECT that is what he was saying.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Cracker wrote:

Yes you did. Your insinuations were obvious to all. And clean up your language.

Shove your clean language up your arse.
You are a fucking liar ,& you cannot show where I posted what you claim..

If I have something to say about derpball I will say it...


XMAN get this twit to retract his lie or its open slather.

He's claiming you insinuated, which is an opinion

Are you blind.???


Read what he wrote.


Postby Cracker » Wed Apr 09, 2014 10:23 am

In order to be competitive, the NRL must follow the AFL's lead, AFLcrap1. It's all very well to state in effect that AFL players will have nothing when their career is over. They will have a healthy bank account that will allow them to start their own business. Some go into the media. The NRL should be allowing it's salary cap to rise so players can be encouraged to play the game full time and make money out of it. Having a second job can actually be a negative in terms of the time required in both areas. This is a distinct problem at the local level in Aussie Rules. I've seen it in Albury and I still see it where I live now.

You show me where I posted anything like what he claimed..
I did not mention the AFL.

I explained why a fringe 1st grader was working part time..

So by your rules I can say what I like about any post & say that ..
IN EFFECT.
or They were INSINUATING in my opinion..

He fucking stated that I said something ,.

Show me Xman in my post where I said anything like that..


So in future I will in my opinion ,say that Crackhead was INSINUATING that he likes to do things with dead animals in the privacy of his own bedroom...
Oh sorry ..

IN EFFECT that is what he was saying.

I don't believe you meant it, but he does. I'm not adjudicating on clear opinions

Fine then .
I can have any opinion I want on other posts..

No worries if its a straight out lie..

& I don't expect to be pulled up for what I THINK they posted .No matter how far removed from reality it is.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Fine then .
I can have any opinion I want on other posts..

No worries if its a straight out lie..

& I don't expect to be pulled up for what I THINK they posted .No matter how far removed from reality it is.

Don't you think a moderator deciding which personal opinions should be posted is a bit silly?

Cracker wrote:

AFLcrap1, I made it clear that the attribution I applied to you was "in effect", which just for your information means that it's what you meant and not what you said. The intent of your comment was to put over the NRL part time situation as the right way to go. I disagreed and explained why. If you take offence to this then I pity your mental health.

In effect what you are really saying..in my opinion ,is that you are an inmate of a mental health facility,& have no chance of getting out.

In my opinion.

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Fine then .
I can have any opinion I want on other posts..

No worries if its a straight out lie..

& I don't expect to be pulled up for what I THINK they posted .No matter how far removed from reality it is.

Don't you think a moderator deciding which personal opinions should be posted is a bit silly?

I think a moderator should pull someone up for posting an outright lie..

Go back & read post 2 by me in this thread.

Then read the reply by Crackhead.
& tell me or show me where I stated what he said..

How the fuck can he say I said something about the AFL ,when I never mentioned them .
Never compared what the AFL do to what the NRL do..



YOu can sit on the fence ...
But don't pull me up for having opinions.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Fine then .
I can have any opinion I want on other posts..

No worries if its a straight out lie..

& I don't expect to be pulled up for what I THINK they posted .No matter how far removed from reality it is.

Don't you think a moderator deciding which personal opinions should be posted is a bit silly?

I think a moderator should pull someone up for posting an outright lie..

Go back & read post 2 by me in this thread.

Then read the reply by Crackhead.
& tell me or show me where I stated what he said..

How the fuck can he say I said something about the AFL ,when I never mentioned them .
Never compared what the AFL do to what the NRL do..



YOu can sit on the fence ...
But don't pull me up for having opinions.

He's claiming your comment insinuates something about the AFL even though you didnt mention them specifically. Once mods become police for personal opinions we might as well give up

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Fine then .
I can have any opinion I want on other posts..

No worries if its a straight out lie..

& I don't expect to be pulled up for what I THINK they posted .No matter how far removed from reality it is.

Don't you think a moderator deciding which personal opinions should be posted is a bit silly?

I think a moderator should pull someone up for posting an outright lie..

Go back & read post 2 by me in this thread.

Then read the reply by Crackhead.
& tell me or show me where I stated what he said..

How the fuck can he say I said something about the AFL ,when I never mentioned them .
Never compared what the AFL do to what the NRL do..



YOu can sit on the fence ...
But don't pull me up for having opinions.

He's claiming your comment insinuates something about the AFL even though you didnt mention them specifically. Once mods become police for personal opinions we might as well give up

This is gunna be fun..
Thanks .

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Fine then .
I can have any opinion I want on other posts..

No worries if its a straight out lie..

& I don't expect to be pulled up for what I THINK they posted .No matter how far removed from reality it is.

Whaaaaa, whaaaaa, whaaaaaa, whaaaa - you whine more than anyone I have ever known - I found the insinuation as well LOUD and clear - again you like to have these meanings in your posts and then run away when you get pulled up about it - just for once admit your wrong and move on!

It would appear that AFLcrap1 has sporadic issues with comprehension. And responsibility for what he says, and in the future this will be of interest.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Cracker wrote:

In order to be competitive, the NRL must follow the AFL's lead, AFLcrap1. It's all very well to state in effect that AFL players will have nothing when their career is over. They will have a healthy bank account that will allow them to start their own business. Some go into the media. The NRL should be allowing it's salary cap to rise so players can be encouraged to play the game full time and make money out of it. Having a second job can actually be a negative in terms of the time required in both areas. This is a distinct problem at the local level in Aussie Rules. I've seen it in Albury and I still see it where I live now.

What fucking planet are you on.
I am serious.

Where did I say the highlighted bit above.
Fuck off until you can talk about what I posted ,not what the voices in your head tell you.

The rest of that pile of crap is just as stupid as the bit I responded to..
You pretend to know about RL but don't have a clue.

Gotta say I agree with AFLc. He never made a single reference to AFL players in his comment, yet cracker incorrectly assumed he did.

I think an apology is in order

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Fine then .
I can have any opinion I want on other posts..

No worries if its a straight out lie..

& I don't expect to be pulled up for what I THINK they posted .No matter how far removed from reality it is.

Whaaaaa, whaaaaa, whaaaaaa, whaaaa - you whine more than anyone I have ever known - I found the insinuation as well LOUD and clear - again you like to have these meanings in your posts and then run away when you get pulled up about it - just for once admit your wrong and move on!

Bullshit.
If I was saying something about the AFL ..I would say it.
If I think someone is lying..i will post what I think is proof it is a lie..

& of course you would see an insinuation..you are a strange one...

There is no insinuation..
It was a simple explanation of why a player would have another job..
No comparison at all to any other sport.

My guess is the AFL would have something very similar in place for young fringe players.

So put your paranoia on hold.

I have no problems calling AFL racist/homophobic/liars etc,
so tell me WHY the fuck do I need to make insinuations.

Paranoid central here with you fumblers.