Talking Footy

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

What I love about the AFL is that there is a role for almost every body size. Sandinlands is 7 foot and can dominate. Boomer Harvey is around 5'7" and can win games on his own. Lean players like Dustin Fletcher can be the best in their class, while heavy set players like Lockett can be unstoppable.

What a great game!

yes .... only the VFL has this

oh by the way
Sam Kasiano & Chris Sandow say hi


seriously
are there a bigger pack of dribblers around then fumblers :_<> :_<> :_<>

who?

Like I said, I compared the storm and Geelong. One major difference was the variability in player shapes and sizes in the AFL, where as NRL players were far more likely to conform to a similar body shape and size.

again
you're ignorance is astounding

you & most fumblers think the VFL is the only sport that has variance in size
but as we all know ...........fumblers are dribblers
end of


http://www.zerotackle.com/nrl/rugby-lea ... -shortest/
half you seen RL half backs & some fullbacks

I never said RL didnt have diversity numb nuts.

sure dickhead

sure

Quoting only parts of my comments doesn't change what I said, it merely makes you look stupid.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

What I love about the AFL is that there is a role for almost every body size. Sandinlands is 7 foot and can dominate. Boomer Harvey is around 5'7" and can win games on his own. Lean players like Dustin Fletcher can be the best in their class, while heavy set players like Lockett can be unstoppable.

What a great game!

yes .... only the VFL has this

oh by the way
Sam Kasiano & Chris Sandow say hi


seriously
are there a bigger pack of dribblers around then fumblers :_<> :_<> :_<>

who?

Like I said, I compared the storm and Geelong. One major difference was the variability in player shapes and sizes in the AFL, where as NRL players were far more likely to conform to a similar body shape and size.

again
you're ignorance is astounding

you & most fumblers think the VFL is the only sport that has variance in size
but as we all know ...........fumblers are dribblers
end of


http://www.zerotackle.com/nrl/rugby-lea ... -shortest/
half you seen RL half backs & some fullbacks

I never said RL didnt have diversity numb nuts.

sure dickhead

sure

Quoting only parts of my comments doesn't change what I said, it merely makes you look stupid.

my link made you look like a dribbler

but but
I didn't say that ... truly wuely I didn't
:_<> :_<> :_<>

you we're made look like a moron
as you often are on these forums :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Dave is showing his mental instability again. Listen, goose, AFL players are NOT ALL SKINNY!!! In order to be a success at the game, Folau and Hunt had to slim down. Hunt did it. Folau bailed. Our game is faster so too much weight is a fricking BAD thing! Getting it yet? Nah you won't get it because you CAN'T!

and they still couldn't keep up, RL finest a bit like failure dave trying to comprehend this argument
hunt is still struggling to get a game for the suns, a team that has struggled for the last 3 years, now the kids are getting older & match ready hunt will only struggle more!

falou, he took his boots & socked off



statistical analysis reveals that he is the second-worst player in the league this season among those who have played 10 or more games.

According to Champion Data player ranking points, Folau's first season in the AFL grades him the 415th player out of the 416 to have played 10 or more games.

Only 22-year-old Richmond small utility Addam Maric has a lower Champion Data ranking points average this season - a player who earns roughly 7 per cent of Folau's $6 million, four-year-deal.

Maric has also had fewer opportunities than Folau, having been subbed out of the game seven times in 2012 and spending just 46 per cent of time on the field compared with Folau's 80 per cent.



It is easy to make a case that Folau's average of six possessions and 0.1 goals per game makes him the worst player in the AFL this year.

As a marketing and promotional tool, the 23-year-old former rugby league superstar's code conversion has been a massive success, but on the field he has struggled to adapt.

It has never been more obvious than during the Giants' most recent games against Gold Coast Suns and Melbourne Demons where his haul of four possessions has prompted calls for him to return to rugby league.


failed, to slow, to unskilled, to stupid

No marngrook is actually slower. RL is faster as shown by the fastest men in league easily being faster than fastest in marngrook. Marngrook is a bigger field where trotting long distances is essential.

Just look at the typical body shapes. Marngrookers at their best look like netballers, teenage girls and/or 15k or marathon runners. RL players look like boxers, UFC fighters, body builders and 100metre sprint champs.

:D I'm on the money!

King-Eliagh wrote:

No marngrook is actually slower. RL is faster as shown by the fastest men in league easily being faster than fastest in marngrook. Marngrook is a bigger field where trotting long distances is essential.

Just look at the typical body shapes. Marngrookers at their best look like netballers, teenage girls and/or 15k or marathon runners. RL players look like boxers, UFC fighters, body builders and 100metre sprint champs.

:D I'm on the money!

What about Josh Hunt, Patton, Pike, Dean Cox etc etc sorry KE way off the mark - but agree that RL is short burst probably faster but usual for only 30 - 40 meters max AFL (particularly midfielders) 80 - 120 at 3/4 flat out 10 - 30 meters but that's just the difference in the two games. I wonder how RL players will go now they have to play a full 80 min instead of between 50 - 60 min out of the 80? I guess that bulk will become a burden and they will slim down to 1980's sizes when the game was faster.

& i wonder how Fumblers would go if they only had 10 interchanges per side per game ...
150 ..bhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.they rack up the KMs running to & from the Interchange bench.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

& i wonder how Fumblers would go if they only had 10 interchanges per side per game ...
150 ..bhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.they rack up the KMs running to & from the Interchange bench.

I wonder how RL if they had to play for 120 min!

AFLcrap1 wrote:

& i wonder how Fumblers would go if they only had 10 interchanges per side per game ...
150 ..bhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.they rack up the KMs running to & from the Interchange bench.

Why does the number of breaks make a difference. There are large periods in RL where almost every player ambles along. That beats interchanges by miles.

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

What I love about the AFL is that there is a role for almost every body size. Sandinlands is 7 foot and can dominate. Boomer Harvey is around 5'7" and can win games on his own. Lean players like Dustin Fletcher can be the best in their class, while heavy set players like Lockett can be unstoppable.

What a great game!

yes .... only the VFL has this

oh by the way
Sam Kasiano & Chris Sandow say hi


seriously
are there a bigger pack of dribblers around then fumblers :_<> :_<> :_<>

who?

Like I said, I compared the storm and Geelong. One major difference was the variability in player shapes and sizes in the AFL, where as NRL players were far more likely to conform to a similar body shape and size.

again
you're ignorance is astounding

you & most fumblers think the VFL is the only sport that has variance in size
but as we all know ...........fumblers are dribblers
end of


http://www.zerotackle.com/nrl/rugby-lea ... -shortest/
half you seen RL half backs & some fullbacks

I never said RL didnt have diversity numb nuts.

sure dickhead

sure

Quoting only parts of my comments doesn't change what I said, it merely makes you look stupid.

my link made you look like a dribbler

but but
I didn't say that ... truly wuely I didn't
:_<> :_<> :_<>

you we're made look like a moron
as you often are on these forums :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Your link shows the tallest NRL players are 6'6", with 5'6" the shortest

Almost every AFL club would have at least 3 players well over 6'6", some being 6'8" up to 7'. Yet the smallest players in the AFL would be around the same height as smaller players in RL.

So all youve done is prove my case!

Swans4ever wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

No marngrook is actually slower. RL is faster as shown by the fastest men in league easily being faster than fastest in marngrook. Marngrook is a bigger field where trotting long distances is essential.

Just look at the typical body shapes. Marngrookers at their best look like netballers, teenage girls and/or 15k or marathon runners. RL players look like boxers, UFC fighters, body builders and 100metre sprint champs.

:D I'm on the money!

What about Josh Hunt, Patton, Pike, Dean Cox etc etc sorry KE way off the mark - but agree that RL is short burst probably faster but usual for only 30 - 40 meters max AFL (particularly midfielders) 80 - 120 at 3/4 flat out 10 - 30 meters but that's just the difference in the two games. I wonder how RL players will go now they have to play a full 80 min instead of between 50 - 60 min out of the 80? I guess that bulk will become a burden and they will slim down to 1980's sizes when the game was faster.

I did say "typical body shapes. "Pikey's a bit bigger than your avg AFL player or teenage lass but he played RU first Dean cox is lanky and not physically built. The other two I don't know about. Compare Pyke and Cox though to say Jarryd Hayne in a 100metre sprint and for various strengths tests and you'd find the AFL lads losing quite badly. Quite badly indeed.

RL involves much faster and stronger players. There's simply no doubts about it

Time to suck down some of your own bullshit medicine swinesy me boy and ... acknowledge this good thing about RL Comon now, admit it's true.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

No marngrook is actually slower. RL is faster as shown by the fastest men in league easily being faster than fastest in marngrook. Marngrook is a bigger field where trotting long distances is essential.

Just look at the typical body shapes. Marngrookers at their best look like netballers, teenage girls and/or 15k or marathon runners. RL players look like boxers, UFC fighters, body builders and 100metre sprint champs.

:D I'm on the money!

What about Josh Hunt, Patton, Pike, Dean Cox etc etc sorry KE way off the mark - but agree that RL is short burst probably faster but usual for only 30 - 40 meters max AFL (particularly midfielders) 80 - 120 at 3/4 flat out 10 - 30 meters but that's just the difference in the two games. I wonder how RL players will go now they have to play a full 80 min instead of between 50 - 60 min out of the 80? I guess that bulk will become a burden and they will slim down to 1980's sizes when the game was faster.

I did say "typical body shapes. "Pikey's a bit bigger than your avg AFL player or teenage lass but he played RU first Dean cox is lanky and not physically built. The other two I don't know about. Compare Pyke and Cox though to say Jarryd Hayne in a 100metre sprint and for various strengths tests and you'd find the AFL lads losing quite badly. Quite badly indeed.

RL involves much faster and stronger players. There's simply no doubts about it

Time to suck down some of your own bullshit medicine swinesy me boy and ... acknowledge this good thing about RL Comon now, admit it's true.

Admit your wrong why of course your wrong!

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

& i wonder how Fumblers would go if they only had 10 interchanges per side per game ...
150 ..bhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.they rack up the KMs running to & from the Interchange bench.

Why does the number of breaks make a difference. There are large periods in RL where almost every player ambles along. That beats interchanges by miles.

& there are plenty of players 100 mtrs from the action in derpball,rubbing man boobies with an opposition player or pinching each other .

there was an article (will find it ) where Nathan friend was scientifically monitered in a game & the force he experienced in tackling was the same Gs as a jet fighter pilot..
& he does this 40-50 times a game .
Tell me how being a long distance runner without the impacts/collisions of rl players makes fumbler better.

Swans4ever wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

No marngrook is actually slower. RL is faster as shown by the fastest men in league easily being faster than fastest in marngrook. Marngrook is a bigger field where trotting long distances is essential.

Just look at the typical body shapes. Marngrookers at their best look like netballers, teenage girls and/or 15k or marathon runners. RL players look like boxers, UFC fighters, body builders and 100metre sprint champs.

:D I'm on the money!

What about Josh Hunt, Patton, Pike, Dean Cox etc etc sorry KE way off the mark - but agree that RL is short burst probably faster but usual for only 30 - 40 meters max AFL (particularly midfielders) 80 - 120 at 3/4 flat out 10 - 30 meters but that's just the difference in the two games. I wonder how RL players will go now they have to play a full 80 min instead of between 50 - 60 min out of the 80? I guess that bulk will become a burden and they will slim down to 1980's sizes when the game was faster.

I did say "typical body shapes. "Pikey's a bit bigger than your avg AFL player or teenage lass but he played RU first Dean cox is lanky and not physically built. The other two I don't know about. Compare Pyke and Cox though to say Jarryd Hayne in a 100metre sprint and for various strengths tests and you'd find the AFL lads losing quite badly. Quite badly indeed.

RL involves much faster and stronger players. There's simply no doubts about it

Time to suck down some of your own bullshit medicine swinesy me boy and ... acknowledge this good thing about RL Comon now, admit it's true.

Admit your wrong why of course your wrong!

Pyke and Cox versus Hayne in a 100metre sprint? Strengthwise?

I'm right. Stronger and faster players. Please though, link me to some AFL sprinters who run less than 10.5 seconds to the hundred. Link me to some AFL players who can bench press what one of our smallest players, Keiran Foran can, 170kg. I'm right, you're wrong swines. Now admit the truth, stronger and faster players reside in the NRL. Admit it bitch!~



http://www.foxsports.com.au/league/nrl- ... 5918203329

100% right KE.
Fumblers can not accept that when their fumble heroes step out of the Insular AFL bubble they get shown up .
Running ,boxing ,mixed sports events..
doesn't matter ..

the reality is they have no one to match (what they call skills) against anyone else because no one else is interested .

Its like a slow horse winning a One horse race ever week & the owner thinking they have the COX plate winner.
Until you test your self against others then you live in a bubble .
& as has been seen ,when they try to take on other athletes ,the result is bad for fumbleball.

True aflcrap. This is also supported by the apparent ease with which players of other codes can make the top level of the code. Taigh Kennelly played gaelic footy for peanuts then came to the swans and became one of the clubs marquee players in no time, helping them win the 05 GF. Pyke is a former pro RU player, he is now also one of the swans marquee players and gave most of the AFL a marking lesson last year. Khunts wobbling round playing each week up their on the GC, folou, like khunt impressed so many AFL experts.

Then there's me. I found the transition fairly easy too, albeit at a much lower level than AFL and NRL. But I was quickly up to standard and able to make opposing players, who'd played all their life, look pretty silly. It's gods honest truth im telling here guys. I known it sounds bad but I can only tell it how it is. It just doesn't happen the other way round neither. The evidence is so so so ... .... .... .... so so so . ... so so stacked against marngrook on this one... Sorry.