Talking Footy

Still doesn't change the fact that AFL represents NO FUCKING ONE .
There is NO TEAM.

****** logic by Corruptionball fans.

pHyR3 wrote:

NSW/QLD vs NZ holds no significance and haven't been played in a while.

You've just answered your own musing.

If NSW/Qld Vs NZ holds no interest then why would there be interest in a more than predictible ending to a rlwc utilising second rate nrl players?

Guess that Monique of a sport. The nil must b spewing

cos789 wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

NSW/QLD vs NZ holds no significance and haven't been played in a while.

You've just answered your own musing.

If NSW/Qld Vs NZ holds no interest then why would there be interest in a more than predictible ending to a rlwc utilising second rate nrl players?

Don't remember NSW or QLD playing since mid year you fucking dumb ******.

cos789 wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

NSW/QLD vs NZ holds no significance and haven't been played in a while.

You've just answered your own musing.

If NSW/Qld Vs NZ holds no interest then why would there be interest in a more than predictible ending to a rlwc utilising second rate nrl players?

i dunno, you can ask that to the millions in the UK who tuned into Englands games and the 74k sell out crowd for the final why they showed an interest in the best, most popular and profitable RLWC ever.

let's hope that nice $5 million goes to countries who need it most. i.e. USA, Jamaica, RSA, Italy, France etc.

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Excuse me, goose, but what was that last weekend?

NSW/QLD v NZ! NOT Australia v NZ because there were ONLY those two states represented!!

that was australia vs nz. you obviously wouldn't understand what representing your country is, being an AFL fan with no national side.

I thought he may have been referring to the late 90's tri series in which NZ was included in a sort of 'state of origin' thing.

pHyR3 wrote:

wouldn't understand what representing your country is

To represent your country you need to be a national side not a combined NSW& Qld side.

If you want to find out what a national side is then watch the IC.
These are national teams with national players not rent-a-player.

pHyR3 wrote:

cos789 wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

NSW/QLD vs NZ holds no significance and haven't been played in a while.

You've just answered your own musing.

If NSW/Qld Vs NZ holds no interest then why would there be interest in a more than predictible ending to a rlwc utilising second rate nrl players?

i dunno, you can ask that to the millions in the UK who tuned into Englands games and the 74k sell out crowd for the final why they showed an interest in the best, most popular and profitable RLWC ever.

let's hope that nice $5 million goes to countries who need it most. i.e. USA, Jamaica, RSA, Italy, France etc.

Sorry but arn't we in Australia? Couldn't give a tinkers about whats happening in England!

pHyR3 wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Excuse me, goose, but what was that last weekend?

NSW/QLD v NZ! NOT Australia v NZ because there were ONLY those two states represented!!

that was australia vs nz. you obviously wouldn't understand what representing your country is, being an AFL fan with no national side.

I thought he may have been referring to the late 90's tri series in which NZ was included in a sort of 'state of origin' thing.

How can a side claim to represent the nation if only two states provide the players (NZ, Fiji or Samoa would equally have more claim considering how lose the criteria it is for national selection!) - it can't be a national side if only NSW and QLD players get into the side and last time I looked since federation there is another four states and a territory that make up the commonwealth of Australia!

cos789 wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

wouldn't understand what representing your country is

To represent your country you need to be a national side not a combined NSW& Qld side.

If you want to find out what a national side is then watch the IC.
These are national teams with national players not rent-a-player.

Were can I watch this BIG event.?
Wich station will it be on?
If I am overseas can you tell me what countries will be televising it.

The insane jealousy or Corruptionball fans will continue till the day they actually find another country to play in an international game.
About 5th Aug 3876.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Excuse me, goose, but what was that last weekend?

NSW/QLD v NZ! NOT Australia v NZ because there were ONLY those two states represented!!

our nations coat of arms proudly sits over the hearts of our national RL team the Kangaroos

Your game does not deserve it and should have the right to use it revoked. It's a two state sport with minimal representation outside of it.

Waaaaaaaaa.waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa waaaaaaaaaaa.

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Excuse me, goose, but what was that last weekend?

NSW/QLD v NZ! NOT Australia v NZ because there were ONLY those two states represented!!

our nations coat of arms proudly sits over the hearts of our national RL team the Kangaroos

. It's a two state sport with minimal representation outside of it.

when it comes to national representation in your sport

its a........... no state .......... no representation .. by anyone ... sport

:_<> :_<> :_<>

& this will never change

VFL

worlds tiniest sport

No national representation, Dave??????

What do you call domination of four states and two territories and a substantive presence in the other two states??

I call that "national representation"!!!

Of course it won't change!

INTERnational representation? That WILL change! Yep, it's going to get BETTER than 69 countries!

NRLCrap1 wrote:

No national representation, Dave??????

What do you call domination of four states and two territories and a substantive presence in the other two states??

I call that "national representation"!!!

Of course it won't change!

I don't care what a deluded twat calls it

that's
domestic .. club representation........ you blithering cockhead :_<> :_<>
national is representing a nation in the international arena

your sport does not do this
because its the worlds tiniest sport

& you are right

that won't change


OMG
owned
your picture appears in the dictionary under this word :_<> :_<>