I was wondering....
Re: I was wondering....
Still doesn't change the fact that AFL represents NO FUCKING ONE .
There is NO TEAM.
****** logic by Corruptionball fans.
There is NO TEAM.
****** logic by Corruptionball fans.
TLPG
liar extraordinaire
You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.

I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.

You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.


- cos789
- Coach
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:43 pm
- Team: Wookie is a failed pathetic ugly woman
- Location:
Re: I was wondering....
You've just answered your own musing.pHyR3 wrote:NSW/QLD vs NZ holds no significance and haven't been played in a while.
If NSW/Qld Vs NZ holds no interest then why would there be interest in a more than predictible ending to a rlwc utilising second rate nrl players?
Nice try Cos.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
Re: I was wondering....
cos789 wrote:You've just answered your own musing.pHyR3 wrote:NSW/QLD vs NZ holds no significance and haven't been played in a while.
If NSW/Qld Vs NZ holds no interest then why would there be interest in a more than predictible ending to a rlwc utilising second rate nrl players?
Don't remember NSW or QLD playing since mid year you fucking dumb ******.
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
Re: I was wondering....
i dunno, you can ask that to the millions in the UK who tuned into Englands games and the 74k sell out crowd for the final why they showed an interest in the best, most popular and profitable RLWC ever.cos789 wrote:You've just answered your own musing.pHyR3 wrote:NSW/QLD vs NZ holds no significance and haven't been played in a while.
If NSW/Qld Vs NZ holds no interest then why would there be interest in a more than predictible ending to a rlwc utilising second rate nrl players?
let's hope that nice $5 million goes to countries who need it most. i.e. USA, Jamaica, RSA, Italy, France etc.
NRLCrap1 wrote:Ignorant goose. International AFL is big and don't you forget it!
the stupidity....NRLCrap1 wrote:Crowds don't mean squat.
Re: I was wondering....
that was australia vs nz. you obviously wouldn't understand what representing your country is, being an AFL fan with no national side.NRLCrap1 wrote:Excuse me, goose, but what was that last weekend?
NSW/QLD v NZ! NOT Australia v NZ because there were ONLY those two states represented!!
I thought he may have been referring to the late 90's tri series in which NZ was included in a sort of 'state of origin' thing.
NRLCrap1 wrote:Ignorant goose. International AFL is big and don't you forget it!
the stupidity....NRLCrap1 wrote:Crowds don't mean squat.
- cos789
- Coach
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:43 pm
- Team: Wookie is a failed pathetic ugly woman
- Location:
Re: I was wondering....
To represent your country you need to be a national side not a combined NSW& Qld side.pHyR3 wrote:wouldn't understand what representing your country is
If you want to find out what a national side is then watch the IC.
These are national teams with national players not rent-a-player.
Nice try Cos.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 5933
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 8:52 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location:
Re: I was wondering....
Sorry but arn't we in Australia? Couldn't give a tinkers about whats happening in England!pHyR3 wrote:i dunno, you can ask that to the millions in the UK who tuned into Englands games and the 74k sell out crowd for the final why they showed an interest in the best, most popular and profitable RLWC ever.cos789 wrote:You've just answered your own musing.pHyR3 wrote:NSW/QLD vs NZ holds no significance and haven't been played in a while.
If NSW/Qld Vs NZ holds no interest then why would there be interest in a more than predictible ending to a rlwc utilising second rate nrl players?
let's hope that nice $5 million goes to countries who need it most. i.e. USA, Jamaica, RSA, Italy, France etc.
LARGEST MEMBERSHIP, LARGEST PROFIT, LARGEST HOME CROWD AVERAGE - THE BIGGEST CLUB IN SYDNEY - THE SYDNEY SWANS
-
- Coach
- Posts: 5933
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 8:52 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location:
Re: I was wondering....
How can a side claim to represent the nation if only two states provide the players (NZ, Fiji or Samoa would equally have more claim considering how lose the criteria it is for national selection!) - it can't be a national side if only NSW and QLD players get into the side and last time I looked since federation there is another four states and a territory that make up the commonwealth of Australia!pHyR3 wrote:that was australia vs nz. you obviously wouldn't understand what representing your country is, being an AFL fan with no national side.NRLCrap1 wrote:Excuse me, goose, but what was that last weekend?
NSW/QLD v NZ! NOT Australia v NZ because there were ONLY those two states represented!!
I thought he may have been referring to the late 90's tri series in which NZ was included in a sort of 'state of origin' thing.
LARGEST MEMBERSHIP, LARGEST PROFIT, LARGEST HOME CROWD AVERAGE - THE BIGGEST CLUB IN SYDNEY - THE SYDNEY SWANS
Re: I was wondering....
cos789 wrote:To represent your country you need to be a national side not a combined NSW& Qld side.pHyR3 wrote:wouldn't understand what representing your country is
If you want to find out what a national side is then watch the IC.
These are national teams with national players not rent-a-player.





Were can I watch this BIG





Wich station will it be on?
If I am overseas can you tell me what countries will be televising it.
The insane jealousy or Corruptionball fans will continue till the day they actually find another country to play in an international game.
About 5th Aug 3876.
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
TLPG
liar extraordinaire
You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.

I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.

You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.


Re: I was wondering....
Your game does not deserve it and should have the right to use it revoked. It's a two state sport with minimal representation outside of it.Raiderdave wrote:our nations coat of arms proudly sits over the hearts of our national RL team the KangaroosNRLCrap1 wrote:Excuse me, goose, but what was that last weekend?
NSW/QLD v NZ! NOT Australia v NZ because there were ONLY those two states represented!!
DON'T MAKE ANY BETS WITH ELIAGH!! HE WELCHES WHEN HE LOSES!!
DAVE'S RIVER IN EGYPT - JUNIOR ACT TEAMS: AFL 109 RL 107
CHEWBACCA IS A GOOSE! A GOOSE I TELL YOU! A GOOSE!
DAVE'S RIVER IN EGYPT - JUNIOR ACT TEAMS: AFL 109 RL 107
CHEWBACCA IS A GOOSE! A GOOSE I TELL YOU! A GOOSE!
Re: I was wondering....
Waaaaaaaaa.waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa waaaaaaaaaaa.
TLPG
liar extraordinaire
You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.

I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.

You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.


- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: I was wondering....
when it comes to national representation in your sportNRLCrap1 wrote:. It's a two state sport with minimal representation outside of it.Raiderdave wrote:our nations coat of arms proudly sits over the hearts of our national RL team the KangaroosNRLCrap1 wrote:Excuse me, goose, but what was that last weekend?
NSW/QLD v NZ! NOT Australia v NZ because there were ONLY those two states represented!!
its a........... no state .......... no representation .. by









& this will never change





VFL
worlds tiniest sport

RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

Re: I was wondering....
No national representation, Dave??????
What do you call domination of four states and two territories and a substantive presence in the other two states??
I call that "national representation"!!!
Of course it won't change!
INTERnational representation? That WILL change! Yep, it's going to get BETTER than 69 countries!
What do you call domination of four states and two territories and a substantive presence in the other two states??
I call that "national representation"!!!
Of course it won't change!
INTERnational representation? That WILL change! Yep, it's going to get BETTER than 69 countries!
DON'T MAKE ANY BETS WITH ELIAGH!! HE WELCHES WHEN HE LOSES!!
DAVE'S RIVER IN EGYPT - JUNIOR ACT TEAMS: AFL 109 RL 107
CHEWBACCA IS A GOOSE! A GOOSE I TELL YOU! A GOOSE!
DAVE'S RIVER IN EGYPT - JUNIOR ACT TEAMS: AFL 109 RL 107
CHEWBACCA IS A GOOSE! A GOOSE I TELL YOU! A GOOSE!
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: I was wondering....
NRLCrap1 wrote:No national representation, Dave??????
What do you call domination of four states and two territories and a substantive presence in the other two states??
I call that "national representation"!!!
Of course it won't change!





I don't care what a deluded twat calls it
that's
domestic .. club representation........ you blithering cockhead








national is representing a nation in the international arena




your sport does not do this
because its the worlds tiniest sport
& you are right
that won't change






OMG
owned
your picture appears in the dictionary under this word






RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
