Talking Footy

10,000 crowds for international fumbleball, where?

I'm talking about where it counts! At the top - club matches at elite level!

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

10,000 crowds for international fumbleball, where?

who cares, where AFL is played it dominates, 10k turn up for a game of RL & League is the worlds biggest game

No, 10k turn up, that's it.

Rl has far more international presence at a professional level that's why AFL doesn't get much interest internationally ? AFL is by far and away the number 1 sport in this country ... These are two simple facts ... Get over it people .

You don't see the yanks getting all obsessed about whether other countries like their nfl????

NRLCrap1 wrote:

We can poke fun at 10,000 crowds when our average is over three times that!

& we can poke fun at your world cup


when the tiddlywinx one is a bigger event :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

fumbles & bumbles
worlds tiniest sport

Phelpsy wrote:

? AFL is by far and away the number 1 sport in this country ... .

hmmmmm

11 Million less veiwers on TV last year
50 Million less for your media rights deal .... but 50% more air time to sell to advertisers >
yr biggest game beaten by 3 RL games this year..
clubs failing financially left right & centre


nope

number 2

a giant
number 2

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

? AFL is by far and away the number 1 sport in this country ... .

hmmmmm

11 Million less veiwers on TV last year
50 Million less for your media rights deal .... but 50% more air time to sell to advertisers >
yr biggest game beaten by 3 RL games this year..
clubs failing financially left right & centre


nope

number 2

a giant
number 2

The only way the NRL gets close to the AFL in media rights is including NZ which just between you and me isnt in Australia.

So if you count revenue, TV revenue, crowds, sponsorship, memberships, media interest, and cummulative ratings, you win one of those 7 indicators.

1 from 7 aint going to give you first prize in Australia Dave

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

? AFL is by far and away the number 1 sport in this country ... .

hmmmmm

11 Million less veiwers on TV last year
50 Million less for your media rights deal .... but 50% more air time to sell to advertisers >
yr biggest game beaten by 3 RL games this year..
clubs failing financially left right & centre


nope

number 2



a giant
number 2

Again, simply not true .made up figures ..again.


I'll give this a go though ....


AFL got 10 billion more in there media rights than AFL

AFL got 5 billion more tv ratings.


AFL third highest rating sport in India

It's fun to make numbers up but hardly adds to an argument . Phy is right about segueing with idiots. At least he provides some realistic rationale to arguments when talking about nrl ... That is, at least his arguments are debatable as some basis to them such as adding soo in ratings figures .. I'll argue otherwise but at least you can see where he is coming from.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

? AFL is by far and away the number 1 sport in this country ... .

hmmmmm

11 Million less veiwers on TV last year
50 Million less for your media rights deal .... but 50% more air time to sell to advertisers >
yr biggest game beaten by 3 RL games this year..
clubs failing financially left right & centre


nope

number 2

a giant
number 2

just between you and me isnt in Australia.

just between you & me
that's income for our code & we don't care where it comes from.... I mean .. what ?.. aren't we allowed to spend it or something > :_<> :_<> :_<> ..... just because your fumbling shit sport has not gained an ounce of interest outside of Australia in the last 120 years
aint our fault f wit

more participants
more media money
biggest games in the country
more TV veiwers for our sport overall


hows that silver medal goin for ya fumblers

Phelpsy wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

? AFL is by far and away the number 1 sport in this country ... .

hmmmmm

11 Million less veiwers on TV last year
50 Million less for your media rights deal .... but 50% more air time to sell to advertisers >
yr biggest game beaten by 3 RL games this year..
clubs failing financially left right & centre


nope

number 2



a giant
number 2

It's fun to make numbers up .

it must be
just ask the VFL

they've done it for the last 20 years :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

And you say that Dave in the wild deluded hope that it's true. It's not true and you can't handle that!!

Income for the code huh? Well if we added the media rights for AFL from other countries - remember that's 69 countries against 50 in favour of the AFL, we'd win anyway!!

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Income for the code huh? Well if we added the media rights for AFL from other countries - remember that's 69 countries against 50 in favour of the AFL, we'd win anyway!!

>

:_<> :_<> :_<>

oh good lord
proof definitive that this assclown is not all there

you do realise that the VFL pay foreign broadcasters to televise it
that's
pay themselves

not get paid



did you know that you deluded ret.ard >
:_<> :_<>

73,000 is the world record crowd for a RL international - that might be toppled in the semi final and probably the final. The record crowd for a world cup in either union or league is 82,957 (2003 RUWC Final).

Would be amazing if the RL semifinal at wembley topped that, but it would be very difficult. 60-70k is a more reasonable target.