Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Ohhh dear drac, alls your analogies and dribble does not answer the confronting drop in audiences which raider succinctly outlines.

It doesn't even come close to providing a sound reason as to why the mammoth drop in crowds.

Add to this your wonderful avatar, gifted to you by moi as a constant reminder of your stupidity in overestimating the level of support for marngrook in sydney.

Get back in your box chump, you're a lil too stoopid to speak on these matters

KE, bringing talking footy members the true story, since '04

Semi final v prelim. Plus this is Sydney we're talking about. They won't even get 90k from 4 NRL finals which is apparently their preferred code. How the hell can you then criticise a single crowd 37k >

Comprehension fail - Xmas signature move

Explain where I criticised the 37k crowd in the post you've quoted Xman.

For ur convenience and to update ur dull daft understanding, myself and raider are highlighting the massive DROP in swans crowds. Comprehende my child?

LOL 75k odd for 4 games all in Sydney! nRL heartland?

nRL has no heartland.

Any drop may be reflective of an overall drop in crowd attendances at sports in Sydney and not confined to AFL. Nrl has had a drop too yet I don't think it represents the sport is dying. Although given the low base nrl is working from re crowd numbers I think it is more of a worry.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Ohhh dear drac, alls your analogies and dribble does not answer the confronting drop in audiences which raider succinctly outlines.

It doesn't even come close to providing a sound reason as to why the mammoth drop in crowds.

Add to this your wonderful avatar, gifted to you by moi as a constant reminder of your stupidity in overestimating the level of support for marngrook in sydney.

Get back in your box chump, you're a lil too stoopid to speak on these matters

KE, bringing talking footy members the true story, since '04

Yea, the Panthers really wiped the floor with the Giants' crowds

There's a number of reasons behind the Swans' drop, from the ANZ novelty wearing off, financial pressures since the GFC, the introduction of a new AFL side taking 10k fans away, etc.

Anyway, ready for your new signature 'till nRL GF day?

Drac wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Ohhh dear drac, alls your analogies and dribble does not answer the confronting drop in audiences which raider succinctly outlines.

It doesn't even come close to providing a sound reason as to why the mammoth drop in crowds.

Add to this your wonderful avatar, gifted to you by moi as a constant reminder of your stupidity in overestimating the level of support for marngrook in sydney.

Get back in your box chump, you're a lil too stoopid to speak on these matters

KE, bringing talking footy members the true story, since '04

There's a number of reasons behind the Swans' drop, from the ANZ novelty wearing off, financial pressures since the GFC,

?

:_<> :_<>

but but

but but but

but but but

when will the excuses stop with this lot :_<> :_<>

Drac wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Ohhh dear drac, alls your analogies and dribble does not answer the confronting drop in audiences which raider succinctly outlines.

It doesn't even come close to providing a sound reason as to why the mammoth drop in crowds.

Add to this your wonderful avatar, gifted to you by moi as a constant reminder of your stupidity in overestimating the level of support for marngrook in sydney.

Get back in your box chump, you're a lil too stoopid to speak on these matters

KE, bringing talking footy members the true story, since '04

Yea, the Panthers really wiped the floor with the Giants' crowds

There's a number of reasons behind the Swans' drop, from the ANZ novelty wearing off, financial pressures since the GFC, the introduction of a new AFL side taking 10k fans away, etc.

Anyway, ready for your new signature 'till nRL GF day?

you were sure gws would win. You made countless statements in that gws bet thread which beautifully depict ignorance and gross overestimation of the support for marngrook in sydney.

New signature? Ahhh yeah right. I thought you'd try and claim this. Can you point to me where a signature bet was confirmed and what the actual bet was?

King-Eliagh wrote:

New signature? Ahhh yeah right. I thought you'd try and claim this. Can you point to me where a signature bet was confirmed and what the actual bet was?

Certainly. Here was the initial question I pondered, clear as day:

Drac wrote:

Will the 4 finals of nRL this weekend manage to collectively draw as many people through the gates as the single Richmond v Carlton game?

Here's you proposing a signature bet

King-Eliagh wrote:

Sun's just come out on a chilly friday arvo. So I actually dont know the answer to this one....its hard to say.

But in any case, would you care for a signature bet, ol stoopid head?

Here's me agreeing to accept your bet, and proposing that the length be until the end of the nRL finals series

Drac wrote:

Oh what the Hell. 'till the end of the nRL finals series?

Here's you accepting the bet, but suggesting that the length be extended to the end of the year.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Ah yes, you're a good/'stupid' sport Drac! Why not keep things consistent and go for the end of the year?

And here's me declining the extension and keeping it at the original length of time (I mean, 4 games v 1, even I didn't think the nRL was going to fall THAT short).

Drac wrote:

I'm not a glutton for punishment

1 game against 4. 'Till the nRL GF will do.

Seems clear cut to me .

if I had bet I was leaning towards the AFL on this one you silly twat drac! We never stipulated this nor was any bet accepted by moi. Your quote of me stating "ah yes, you're a good stupid sport drac" was me stating just that, you are a stoopid sport drac, not accepting the bet you stoopid tool

I cant believe the NRL had a double header in the first week of the finals with 3 sydney teams & did not even sell out a stadium that holds 40,000.

WOW that is pathetic, really!!

King-Eliagh wrote:

I was leaning towards the AFL

KE now leans towards the AFL. A quotable quote.

And is a welcher of bets to lol

Phelpsy wrote:

Seems clear cut to me .

Indeed. Accept your stupidity and loss KE FFS.

How'd I know you turkeys would all be up in arms, united at the slightest opportunity at a win over the member who so thoroughly belts you into submission, shovelling the awful truth into your gobs, week in week out.

Though I must be honest with you, I can see how it could be construed thru twisted meaning and subjective assumption that I bet against dracs op. But fact is, there was no clear agreement on the conditions nor the actual bet.

I was honestly enjoying toying with drac and his stupidity and was thinking the AFL would win this one in the very short time frame before Friday nights match.

Please folks, take some time to be honest with yourselves and think this over properly

Yours in honesty and innocence and yet to be defeated in the betting ring,

KE

Welcher !!!! Simple as that. And liar too. Should there be a ban on people welching on bets. At the very least it gives drac a reason to drop his sig ...