Page 2 of 2
Re: the VFL is ..officially
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 4:54 pm
by Raiderdave
Drac wrote:Raiderdave wrote: ahhhhhh
the VFL had its lowest average in near 20 years in 2012
&
it will be lucky to beat that figure in 2013 ... only rampant fudging might get them above it
K knob ?
Out of curiosity, that 20 year low; was it still double your crowd average?
nope fuckhead
31,599
16,423
first time we've been inside double
one code on the rise
the other ... in steep ... steep decline
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Re: the VFL is ..officially
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 5:21 pm
by NRLCrap1
Steep decline??? You're nuts, Dave "Allen"! Totally nutsy fagan!
Re: the VFL is ..officially
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 5:38 pm
by piesman2011
Raiderdave wrote:Drac wrote:Raiderdave wrote: ahhhhhh
the VFL had its lowest average in near 20 years in 2012
&
it will be lucky to beat that figure in 2013 ... only rampant fudging might get them above it
K knob ?
Out of curiosity, that 20 year low; was it still double your crowd average?
nope fuckhead
31,599
16,423
first time we've been inside double
one code on the rise
the other ... in steep ... steep decline
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
NRL 15,742 ( less then half)
AFL 32,170 (32,700 by round 23)
Keep posting the facts as you see it Dave.
Re: the VFL is ..officially
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 5:51 pm
by Raiderdave
piesman2011 wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Drac wrote:Raiderdave wrote: ahhhhhh
the VFL had its lowest average in near 20 years in 2012
&
it will be lucky to beat that figure in 2013 ... only rampant fudging might get them above it
K knob ?
Out of curiosity, that 20 year low; was it still double your crowd average?
nope fuckhead
31,599
16,423
first time we've been inside double
one code on the rise
the other ... in steep ... steep decline
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
NRL 15,742 ( less then half)
AFL 32,170 (32,700 by round 23)
Keep posting the facts as you see it Dave.
oh
the seasons ova is it ?
32,700?
you said 34,000 only a few weeks ago
it will be lucky to stay above last years & will only achieve this with rampant fudging ....
maybe stop pulling yr dick & you'll get a prediction right one day
theres a lad
Re: the VFL is ..officially
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 6:19 pm
by Swans4ever
Raiderdave wrote:piesman2011 wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Drac wrote:Raiderdave wrote: ahhhhhh
the VFL had its lowest average in near 20 years in 2012
&
it will be lucky to beat that figure in 2013 ... only rampant fudging might get them above it
K knob ?
Out of curiosity, that 20 year low; was it still double your crowd average?
nope fuckhead
31,599
16,423
first time we've been inside double
one code on the rise
the other ... in steep ... steep decline
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
NRL 15,742 ( less then half)
AFL 32,170 (32,700 by round 23)
Keep posting the facts as you see it Dave.
oh
the seasons ova is it ?
32,700?
you said 34,000 only a few weeks ago
it will be lucky to stay above last years & will only achieve this with rampant fudging ....
maybe stop pulling yr dick & you'll get a prediction right one day
theres a lad
There he goes again getting upset - don't worry mummy will still tuck you in so keep playing with your army men! Going to stay a coward RD and refuse to admit you were wrong? And can't see many 300+ attendance on a weekend to raise that declining NRL average RD - plenty of blockbusters in the AFL but! And don't it hurt RD it hurt so much!
Re: the VFL is ..officially
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 6:49 pm
by Drac
Raiderdave wrote:Drac wrote:Raiderdave wrote: ahhhhhh
the VFL had its lowest average in near 20 years in 2012
&
it will be lucky to beat that figure in 2013 ... only rampant fudging might get them above it
K knob ?
Out of curiosity, that 20 year low; was it still double your crowd average?
nope fuckhead
31,599
16,423
first time we've been inside double
one code on the rise
the other ... in steep ... steep decline
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
1) I love that getting slightly inside DOUBLE is a major win for your sport. Pathetic.
2) You didn't. I don't know where you got your figures from, but I have:
2012 AFL: 32,243
2012 nRL: 15,793
Being thrilled at getting just inside double is pathetic. Not actually getting there and lying about it is just scrumptious.
Re: the VFL is ..officially
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 8:31 pm
by Stewie
Drac wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Drac wrote:Raiderdave wrote: ahhhhhh
the VFL had its lowest average in near 20 years in 2012
&
it will be lucky to beat that figure in 2013 ... only rampant fudging might get them above it
K knob ?
Out of curiosity, that 20 year low; was it still double your crowd average?
nope fuckhead
31,599
16,423
first time we've been inside double
one code on the rise
the other ... in steep ... steep decline
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
1) I love that getting slightly inside DOUBLE is a major win for your sport. Pathetic.
2) You didn't. I don't know where you got your figures from, but I have:
2012 AFL: 32,243
2012 nRL: 15,793
Being thrilled at getting just inside double is pathetic. Not actually getting there and lying about it is just scrumptious.
That's their 2013 crowd figure you're quoting there Drac. Yes they did get within double last year, but as you can see that no longer is the case as in 2013 the AFL crowd average has grown, while the nRL crowd average is on the decline.
Re: the VFL is ..officially
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 8:34 pm
by Swans4ever
Stewie wrote:Drac wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Drac wrote:Raiderdave wrote: ahhhhhh
the VFL had its lowest average in near 20 years in 2012
&
it will be lucky to beat that figure in 2013 ... only rampant fudging might get them above it
K knob ?
Out of curiosity, that 20 year low; was it still double your crowd average?
nope fuckhead
31,599
16,423
first time we've been inside double
one code on the rise
the other ... in steep ... steep decline
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
1) I love that getting slightly inside DOUBLE is a major win for your sport. Pathetic.
2) You didn't. I don't know where you got your figures from, but I have:
2012 AFL: 32,243
2012 nRL: 15,793
Being thrilled at getting just inside double is pathetic. Not actually getting there and lying about it is just scrumptious.
That's their 2013 crowd figure you're quoting there Drac. Yes they did get within double last year, but as you can see that no longer is the case as in 2013 the AFL crowd average has grown, while the nRL crowd average is on the decline.
And Swans yet to play Collingwood and Hawks how much further behind they will be!