Talking Footy

King-Eliagh wrote:

Sorry but last time I checked, even 1 more, let alone 200 means a win. A draw, swines, is when the numbers match, I.e 12000 and 12000 or 13456 and 13456. Ok? You understand?

Ok KE if it makes you feel better you won by 200 people - have a phyric victory

King-Eliagh wrote:

I dunno drac how many?

As for amateur leagues, not a bad point but I think we're concentrating on the NRL and AFL in this one matey. Do stay focussed on the topic at hand drac me boy.

The OP clearly says Rugby League, not nRL.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Sorry but last time I checked, even 1 more, let alone 200 means a win. A draw, swines, is when the numbers match, I.e 12000 and 12000 or 13456 and 13456. Ok? You understand?

So earlier in the year when the Giants outdrew the Raiders Canberra was officially an Aussie Rules city? This is your argument?

Thanks drac but it was an nrl match in Darwin was it not?

Also in afraid there's been a plenty more evidence posted on these boards re the act so forcanberra no, that is not my argument.

Btw drac I think ur gws Penrith thread is calling

Drac wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Sorry but last time I checked, even 1 more, let alone 200 means a win. A draw, swines, is when the numbers match, I.e 12000 and 12000 or 13456 and 13456. Ok? You understand?

So earlier in the year when the Giants outdrew the Raiders Canberra was officially an Aussie Rules city? This is your argument?

jesus what a dick

a) that crowd was fudged .. it was 8K
b) it was once in 6 attempts

the nrl has outdone the vfl on the 2 occasions it has gone to darwin

that's

2/2

& the debate ends ........ here !!

Raiderdave wrote:

Drac wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Sorry but last time I checked, even 1 more, let alone 200 means a win. A draw, swines, is when the numbers match, I.e 12000 and 12000 or 13456 and 13456. Ok? You understand?

So earlier in the year when the Giants outdrew the Raiders Canberra was officially an Aussie Rules city? This is your argument?

jesus what a dick

a) that crowd was fudged .. it was 8K
b) it was once in 6 attempts

the nrl has outdone the vfl on the 2 occasions it has gone to darwin

that's

2/2

& the debate ends ........ here !!

Jesus what a manipulating wanker - 200 people more and its a RL hartland -what a load of crap now lets hear your usual crap - singlet bumblers etc etc

Nothing but regurgitated garbage from the most boring place on earth ! Come on GiantsRD post ur usual dribble!

King-Eliagh wrote:

Thanks drac but it was an nrl match in Darwin was it not?

Also in afraid there's been a plenty more evidence posted on these boards re the act so forcanberra no, that is not my argument.

This is like reasoning with a potatoe. Let me break this down into easily digestible parts.

an nRL game attracts 200 more people than an AFL game in darwin. This is the 2nd time this has happened.

OP claims this means Rugby League the sport is now the dominant sport in Darwin. Note that he didn't say that the nRL was more popular than the AFL in Darwin, he said Rugby League.

I point to the fact more people attend the local NTFL than do the NTRL. I suggest that more players from the NT play in the AFL than the nRL. I asked if anyone knew the figures for the nRL (I don't). I would also suggest that participation in the NT is significantly in favour of Australian Football (http://www.aflnt.com.au/index.php?id=6& ... 38ab1fa9ae). These points are somehow dismissed as irrelevant to the topic of Rugby league being the dominant sport in Darwin.

I jokingly suggest that using this absurd logic, the fact GWS outdrew the Raiders once means that Canberra was, for that weekend at least, officially Australian Football territory. KE points to other evidence that has previously been posted re: canberra. This side information is relevant to the discussion for Canberra, but not relevant in Darwin apparently?

King-Eliagh wrote:

Btw drac I think ur gws Penrith thread is calling

What are you on about? I updated the stats this morning?

Raiderdave wrote:

Drac wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Sorry but last time I checked, even 1 more, let alone 200 means a win. A draw, swines, is when the numbers match, I.e 12000 and 12000 or 13456 and 13456. Ok? You understand?

So earlier in the year when the Giants outdrew the Raiders Canberra was officially an Aussie Rules city? This is your argument?

jesus what a dick

a) that crowd was fudged .. it was 8K
b) it was once in 6 attempts

the nrl has outdone the vfl on the 2 occasions it has gone to darwin

that's

2/2

& the debate ends ........ here !!

So when the Giants outdraw the Raiders a second time Canberra will officially be Australian rules territory? Got it.

Nrl heartland drac me boy. That's what I'm talking about as daveo referred to an nrl match in the op. seriously, you're getting all in a tissy over semantics here drac. Grow up!



And I'd like to see you back in the gws panthers bet thread you made. Or are you going to continue ur shameful silence?

piesman2011 wrote:

Xman wrote:

eelofwest wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Sorry for the extra post folks but im testing a glitch in the system. in my first post I said nicely put raiderdave, yet the word put was omitted. I go in to edit the post and "put" was in there...??? This has happened before so am wondering wtf is going on?

Yes i have had the same problem King................if you do not put the whole of raiderdave name it leaves out the word before it.

Same. No idea why it does this

To mant people were using RDs name in ways that put down the gay community and the mentally challenged.The word arse was used quite a lot. Therefore you have to use his full name, or abbreviate it like i did. Sorry for the inconvenience.

But now everytime the name "Dave" is used (as per Dave Smith, NRL CEO) it's changing Dave to Raiderdave. That's going too far and I think some tweaking is needed.

Canberra isn't even nRL heartland lol. Union is the preferred type of thugby in that shit stain town.

NRLCrap1 wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

Xman wrote:

eelofwest wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Sorry for the extra post folks but im testing a glitch in the system. in my first post I said nicely put raiderdave, yet the word put was omitted. I go in to edit the post and "put" was in there...??? This has happened before so am wondering wtf is going on?

Yes i have had the same problem King................if you do not put the whole of raiderdave name it leaves out the word before it.

Same. No idea why it does this

To mant people were using RDs name in ways that put down the gay community and the mentally challenged.The word arse was used quite a lot. Therefore you have to use his full name, or abbreviate it like i did. Sorry for the inconvenience.

But now everytime the name "Dave" is used (as Raiderdave Smith, NRL CEO) it's Raiderdave to Raiderdave. That's going too far and I think some tweaking is needed.

Yeah agreed. The only reason it was changed was because Judge Judy claimed to be offended by it. How about we just stop with the filtering of the word r***** all together? It's universally accepted that D@ve is r*tarded anyway.

Judge Judy was in here??? WTF???

Stewie wrote:

Canberra isn't even nRL heartland lol. Union is the preferred type of thugby in that shit stain town.

sure it is cockhead
sure

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Drac wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Sorry but last time I checked, even 1 more, let alone 200 means a win. A draw, swines, is when the numbers match, I.e 12000 and 12000 or 13456 and 13456. Ok? You understand?

So earlier in the year when the Giants outdrew the Raiders Canberra was officially an Aussie Rules city? This is your argument?

jesus what a dick

a) that crowd was fudged .. it was 8K
b) it was once in 6 attempts

the nrl has outdone the vfl on the 2 occasions it has gone to darwin

that's

2/2

& the debate ends ........ here !!

Jesus what a manipulating wanker - 200 people more and its a RL hartland -what a load of crap now lets hear your usual crap - singlet bumblers etc etc

Nothing but regurgitated garbage from the most boring place on earth ! Come on GiantsRD post ur usual dribble!

but but but

its bumbles heartland ... isn't it ? >

:_<> :_<>