Talking Footy

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

the delusion

the utter delusion

we see 2-13

that's 2 successful attempts at something out of 15 tries
&

this clown still thinks fumblers are skilful
the game has objectives & there isn't a game I can think of where its players fail to achieve the basics so frequently

they have hands like feet
can't kick straight ( the above is not uncommon)

fumble with no one anywhere near them
have no balance
are quite slow in their recations
are quite weak & feeble

seriously
the VFL's players would be the last on the list of the football codes ability wise
the evidence is there for all to see

Every time a RL player gets the ball they go for a try but rarely do they succeed does that mean they fail more then AFL players? .

so does a vfl player try to kick a goal every time he gets the ball too eh ?

even from 80m out


no


an uppercut
unleash a few on yr chin

RL players if they are lucky will pass(handball) the ball 10-15 meters max and only one player in a side is expected to kick maybe 20 meters (at most) on average they expected to run maybe 10 meters at a time a big distance is 100 meters, but this REARLY ever happens - an AFL is expected to hit the ball with one hand whilst holding it with the other between 5 - 15 meters on average, bounce the oval ball on the ground every 15 meters and must be prepared to defend and attack over distances of between 20-30 meters at a time, kick the ball to a target (some are able to kick with both feet!) at least 40 meters, tackle, mark the ball (not on their chest like RL but in their hands overhead) and be able to predict the play (no need to in RL the opposition always face you you don't have to be able look in 360 deg as they only ever come in one direction!). To get a major score ball MUST be kicked by foot between to posts 6.4 Meters apart (RL only has to touch a line 68 meters wide). Etc etc etc........RL does not have the skill of AF, and as for fumblers why is there so many knock on's in an average game of RL when all they have to do is pass (handball) the ball from one to the other, surely that is not as nearly as difficult as hitting a ball with your fist? Of course not....no NRL is by far not as skilful as AFL. No amount of whinging and calling someone a ********** will change these facts, no matter how they try and twist things - maybe thats why they do twist facts. They just don't want to admit what the rest of Australia and so many people around the world already know!

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

the delusion

the utter delusion

we see 2-13

that's 2 successful attempts at something out of 15 tries
&

this clown still thinks fumblers are skilful
the game has objectives & there isn't a game I can think of where its players fail to achieve the basics so frequently

they have hands like feet
can't kick straight ( the above is not uncommon)

fumble with no one anywhere near them
have no balance
are quite slow in their recations
are quite weak & feeble

seriously
the VFL's players would be the last on the list of the football codes ability wise
the evidence is there for all to see

Every time a RL player gets the ball they go for a try but rarely do they succeed does that mean they fail more then AFL players? .

so does a vfl player try to kick a goal every time he gets the ball too eh ?

even from 80m out


no


an uppercut
unleash a few on yr chin

RL players if they are lucky will pass(handball) the ball 10-15 meters max and only one player in a side is expected to kick maybe 20 meters (at most) on average they expected to run maybe 10 meters at a time a big distance is 100 meters, but this REARLY ever happens - an AFL is expected to hit the ball with one hand whilst holding it with the other between 5 - 15 meters on average, bounce the oval ball on the ground every 15 meters and must be prepared to defend and attack over distances of between 20-30 meters at a time, kick the ball to a target (some are able to kick with both feet!) at least 40 meters, tackle, mark the ball (not on their chest like RL but in their hands overhead) and be able to predict the play (no need to in RL the opposition always face you you don't have to be able look in 360 deg as they only ever come in one direction!). To get a major score ball MUST be kicked by foot between to posts 6.4 Meters apart (RL only has to touch a line 68 meters wide). Etc etc etc........RL does not have the skill of AF, and as for fumblers why is there so many knock on's in an average game of RL when all they have to do is pass (handball) the ball from one to the other, surely that is not as nearly as difficult as hitting a ball with your fist? Of course not....no NRL is by far not as skilful as AFL. No amount of whinging and calling someone a ********** will change these facts, no matter how they try and twist things - maybe thats why they do twist facts. They just don't want to admit what the rest of Australia and so many people around the world already know!

how much wrong can one put into the one post
seriously .....how much ?

above is your answer :_<> :_<>

Phelpsy wrote:

. AFL is more about how the ball is used by foot and hand and athletic ability. .

Phelpsy wrote:

Dave, we get you don't like AFL ... That's fine. Do you really think those who like AFL are going to read your posts and decide to change their mind. I am not a fan of soccer or nfl but you don't see me going on and on about it. You'll just have to accept that AFL is incredibly popular in this country as ratings and crowd figures show and that a lot of people like it.

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Dave, we get you don't like AFL ... That's fine. Do you really think those who like AFL are going to read your posts and decide to change their mind. I am not a fan of soccer or nfl but you don't see me going on and on about it. You'll just have to accept that AFL is incredibly popular in this country as ratings and crowd figures show and that a lot of people like it.

its incredibly popular in

one city of

one state of

one country

& as we know
theres is something seriously wrong with the inhabitants of the above

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Dave, we get you don't like AFL ... That's fine. Do you really think those who like AFL are going to read your posts and decide to change their mind. I am not a fan of soccer or nfl but you don't see me going on and on about it. You'll just have to accept that AFL is incredibly popular in this country as ratings and crowd figures show and that a lot of people like it.

its incredibly popular in

one city of

one state of

one country

& as we know
theres is something seriously wrong with the inhabitants of the above

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Dave, we get you don't like AFL ... That's fine. Do you really think those who like AFL are going to read your posts and decide to change their mind. I am not a fan of soccer or nfl but you don't see me going on and on about it. You'll just have to accept that AFL is incredibly popular in this country as ratings and crowd figures show and that a lot of people like it.

its incredibly popular in

one city of

one state of

one country

& as we know
theres is something seriously wrong with the inhabitants of the above

nRL is incredibly popular in

zero cities

zero states

zero countries

Sit the fuck down Raiderdave you ******

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Dave, we get you don't like AFL ... That's fine. Do you really think those who like AFL are going to read your posts and decide to change their mind. I am not a fan of soccer or nfl but you don't see me going on and on about it. You'll just have to accept that AFL is incredibly popular in this country as ratings and crowd figures show and that a lot of people like it.

its incredibly popular in

one city of

one state of

one country

& as we know
theres is something seriously wrong with the inhabitants of the above

Yet per capita Adelaide and Perth attend and watch AFL in similar numbers to Melbourne suggesting ARs is just as popular. Another fail Raiderdave

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Dave, we get you don't like AFL ... That's fine. Do you really think those who like AFL are going to read your posts and decide to change their mind. I am not a fan of soccer or nfl but you don't see me going on and on about it. You'll just have to accept that AFL is incredibly popular in this country as ratings and crowd figures show and that a lot of people like it.

its incredibly popular in

one city of

one state of

one country

& as we know
theres is something seriously wrong with the inhabitants of the above

nRL is incredibly popular in

zero cities

zero states

zero countries

Sit the fuck down Raiderdave you ******

134 Million.. ( 11 million more then Vicky kicky ) spread ova many more cities then one..... say yr wrong you ********* halfwit

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Dave, we get you don't like AFL ... That's fine. Do you really think those who like AFL are going to read your posts and decide to change their mind. I am not a fan of soccer or nfl but you don't see me going on and on about it. You'll just have to accept that AFL is incredibly popular in this country as ratings and crowd figures show and that a lot of people like it.

its incredibly popular in

one city of

one state of

one country

& as we know
theres is something seriously wrong with the inhabitants of the above

nRL is incredibly popular in

zero cities

zero states

zero countries

Sit the fuck down Raiderdave you ******

134 Million.. ( 11 million more then Vicky kicky ) spread ova many more cities then one..... say yr wrong you ********* halfwit

Moving to TV ratings now hey?

As if crowds was ever a fair comparison

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Dave, we get you don't like AFL ... That's fine. Do you really think those who like AFL are going to read your posts and decide to change their mind. I am not a fan of soccer or nfl but you don't see me going on and on about it. You'll just have to accept that AFL is incredibly popular in this country as ratings and crowd figures show and that a lot of people like it.

its incredibly popular in

one city of

one state of

one country

& as we know
theres is something seriously wrong with the inhabitants of the above

nRL is incredibly popular in

zero cities

zero states

zero countries

Sit the fuck down Raiderdave you ******

134 Million.. ( 11 million more then Vicky kicky ) spread ova many more cities then one..... say yr wrong you ********* halfwit

Moving to TV ratings now hey?

As if crowds was ever a fair comparison

our games popularity is diverse