Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Support includes tv viewers xman. Perhaps you accidentally added a zero onto your figure above?



6,832. Eeeeeeek Wonder what they'll get next time?

6832 v 10000 the raiders typical crowd

:D

3,500.... V 10,000

get it right wombat

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Whattabout the tv viewers in canberra?

So raiders fans are house bound?

well the midgets fans in Canberra aren;t

that was the lot of em there yesterday

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Support includes tv viewers xman. Perhaps you accidentally added a zero onto your figure above?



6,832. Eeeeeeek Wonder what they'll get next time?

6832 v 10000 the raiders typical crowd

:D

3,500.... V 10,000

get it right wombat

so the AFL fudge but the NRL don't.

You seriously are the dumbest person I know

King-Eliagh wrote:

You got the numbers?

You seem to support Dave's madness. Do you agree the giants crowds are all fudged while the raiders are all fine?

I want tv viewer numbers Xman you git.

Jeez its hard working with someone who doesnt bother reading....

i think a new nicname for you must be born xman. 'The mod who doesnt bother reading'. Too long for you to read I know Xman but important for others to get the gist of your character

6,000?

6,000, yeah right, and essingdone coaches, players and by the looks of it, the fans only had 1 injection each aye, and the tooth fairy really is real

King-Eliagh wrote:

I want tv viewer numbers Xman you git.

Jeez its hard working with someone who doesnt bother reading....

i think a new nicname for you must be born xman. 'The mod who doesnt bother reading'. Too long for you to read I know Xman but important for others to get the gist of your character

You can't participate in two topics at once? Or is it simple deflection?

I'm happy for you to find some ratings figures KE, since youre the one who introduced it. But attendance is attendance and they indicate the giants have a reasonable following already compared to the raiders despite their infancy and poor performance.

Or are you suggesting raiders fans don't like attending their games?

I consider support to be tv viewers also Xman, stop deflecting. I mean television is clearly the biggest dollar provider for both codes, right?

Xman wrote:

But attendance is attendance and they indicate the giants have a reasonable following already compared to the raiders despite their infancy and poor performance.

Hilarious. Ahhhh Xman arent you one of the gumbys who state how poorly the raiders are performing in terms of crowds? Actually i think the term poorly would be an understatement, you've basically trashed that clubs crowds for months in the most negative light you can possibly put it.

And.... now you're suggesting a crowd of less than 70% that of the Raiders average is a good thing! Whether GWS are in their "infancy" or not you've just contradicted yourself bigtime. Another massive contradiction from our Xman :D

I wonder what the Raiders avg crowd was during their 2nd year in the NRL?

King-Eliagh wrote:

I consider support to be tv viewers also Xman, stop deflecting. I mean television is clearly the biggest dollar provider for both codes, right?

Xman wrote:

But attendance is attendance and they indicate the giants have a reasonable following already compared to the raiders despite their infancy and poor performance.

Hilarious. Ahhhh Xman arent you one of the gumbys who state how poorly the raiders are performing in terms of crowds? Actually i think the term poorly would be an understatement, you've basically trashed that clubs crowds for months in the most negative light you can possibly put it.

And.... now you're suggesting a crowd of less than 70% that of the Raiders average is a good thing! Whether GWS are in their "infancy" or not you've just contradicted yourself bigtime. Another massive contradiction from our Xman :D

I wonder what the Raiders avg crowd was during their 2nd year in the NRL?

Should I say it slowly for you?

The raiders crowds are poor for a club that 1. Made the finals last year 2. Has 20yr history 3. Is the only professional sporting club of either code in the city.

The giants with no form, based in Sydney, and little history overall already have attendances 70% of the raiders when no away fans are included

Wow, just wow

6,832...and without sarcasm we haaaave

Xman wrote:

Wow. Just wow.

:_<> :_<>

The real number being closer to 2k though

King-Eliagh wrote:

6,832...and without sarcasm we haaaave

Xman wrote:

Wow. Just wow.

:_<> :_<>

Last year KE they had crowds at their home ground of around 7-9k with substantial away attendance. Yesterday they had nearly 7k of Canberra giants fans =D>

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

6,832...and without sarcasm we haaaave

Xman wrote:

Wow. Just wow.

:_<> :_<>

Last year KE they had crowds at their home ground of around 7-9k with substantial away attendance. Yesterday they had nearly 7k of Canberra giants fans =D>

You havent the foggiest what you're on about have you.

Xman wrote:

Wow. Just wow.

Haha, inflated by only 300%-400%