
The AFL have had well over 700k for the first 2 rounds EVER.
Yep, EVER, we'll up on last year =D>
Games in all the 5 biggest states =D>
It happened because the AFL shifted heartland games to Tasmania that would have rated 3 times higher in Melbourne, and introduced 2 new teams without an established fan base.Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:If the NRL put 2 new teams in Perth and Adelaide, and they average only 10k, this means the NrL is shrinking does it?
Right.......![]()
![]()
![]()
More fans across the country, but somehow less fans also..![]()
![]()
![]()
Another classic Davisms!
you **** wanna be![]()
![]()
![]()
the NRL would increase its aggregate if we had 2 more sides averaging just ... 10K
it would increase to 3.7 Million from the present 3.5 mill
for you see ..... like ALL other codes on the planet
if we increased our numb of games .... we'd increase our total aggregate attendance
but
unlike your garbage crap game
that increased its game total by 22
it dropped its total aggregate attendance .. dropped it , thats right
and..... the average as well
by a whopping 6K a game
how the HELL did that happen
I mean .. thats clever
I'll give the VFL that![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
decline .... theres just no other word
85k Sellout.Raiderdave wrote:so
how'd the crowd go for the Collingdon ... Carltenmond game today
92,000 ?
93,000 ?
how many ********* turned up for the bumbleathon at the gggggggggggg
it was 90K plus like you promised us it would be wasn't it marcus ?
Xman wrote:So you agree that expansion can drop the average but increase the tally. Got it.![]()
=D>
I've already told you. 10 games in Tasmania that would have had crowds of 30-50k in Melbourne yet only got 10-15k each in Tasmania.Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:So you agree that expansion can drop the average but increase the tally. Got it.![]()
=D>
not by 16%
thats ridiculous
& if the aggregate goes down .... how it could is just astounding
well its curtains for that comp
tis pooh
tis done
Xman wrote:85k Sellout.Raiderdave wrote:so
how'd the crowd go for the Collingdon ... Carltenmond game today
92,000 ?
93,000 ?
how many ********* turned up for the bumbleathon at the gggggggggggg
it was 90K plus like you promised us it would be wasn't it marcus ?
About 80% of the nrls current round tally in one game. Oh the shame....
Xman wrote:I've already told you. 10 games in Tasmania that would have had crowds of 30-50k in Melbourne yet only got 10-15k each in Tasmania.Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:So you agree that expansion can drop the average but increase the tally. Got it.![]()
=D>
not by 16%
thats ridiculous
& if the aggregate goes down .... how it could is just astounding
well its curtains for that comp
tis pooh
tis done
Add to that 2 teams that were uncompetitive for many games so crowds were naturally lower for these games.
Anyway, that was last year. This year we are seeing record attendance
So playing games in Tasmania is an excuse....rightRaiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:I've already told you. 10 games in Tasmania that would have had crowds of 30-50k in Melbourne yet only got 10-15k each in Tasmania.Raiderdave wrote:
not by 16%
thats ridiculous
& if the aggregate goes down .... how it could is just astounding
well its curtains for that comp
tis pooh
tis done
Add to that 2 teams that were uncompetitive for many games so crowds were naturally lower for these games.
Anyway, that was last year. This year we are seeing record attendance
but but but
but but
but but but ...![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
the excuses .... they are as lame as they come![]()
![]()
now you're getting it dickheadXman wrote:playing games in Tasmania is an excuse....Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:I've already told you. 10 games in Tasmania that would have had crowds of 30-50k in Melbourne yet only got 10-15k each in Tasmania.
Add to that 2 teams that were uncompetitive for many games so crowds were naturally lower for these games.
Anyway, that was last year. This year we are seeing record attendance
but but but
but but
but but but ...![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
the excuses .... they are as lame as they come![]()
![]()
And what's the NRls excuse for getting less attendance in 5 rounds than the AFL in 2?Raiderdave wrote:now you're getting it dickheadXman wrote:playing games in Tasmania is an excuse....Raiderdave wrote:
but but but
but but
but but but ...![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
the excuses .... they are as lame as they come![]()
![]()
add an extra 5 games to our aggregate total ( so its the same game amount for both) & we're 80K aheadXman wrote:And what's the NRls excuse for getting less attendance in 5 rounds than the AFL in 2?Raiderdave wrote:now you're getting it dickheadXman wrote:playing games in Tasmania is an excuse....
Phelpsy wrote:RD I get a little confused ... .
You could add another 5 games if you wanted but the ARLC know theyre not ready. Add another Brisbane team and watch the Broncos shrink.Raiderdave wrote:add an extra 5 games to our aggregate total ( so its the same game amount for both) & we're 80K aheadXman wrote:And what's the NRls excuse for getting less attendance in 5 rounds than the AFL in 2?Raiderdave wrote:now you're getting it dickhead
5 years ago
it took us 6 rounds to equal the VFL's 2
in 5 years
we'll need only 4 rounds
its obvious
we're growing
& the VFL is not .....