SCG nearing a sellout

[Raiderdave]

So from where I sit no one knows the actual total tv audience fit the swans v giants game for Sydney. We know free to air and that's it. The rest is just speculation either for or against higher or lower numbers!!

oh we know it .. or near enough to it just fine
its just not a figure vicky kicky cheerleaders in here want to acknowledge

[Xman]

So from where I sit no one knows the actual total tv audience fit the swans v giants game for Sydney. We know free to air and that's it. The rest is just speculation either for or against higher or lower numbers!!

oh we know it .. or near enough to it just fine
its just not a figure vicky kicky cheerleaders in here want to acknowledge

"We"

Is that your multiple personalities Dave? Dumb and dumber?

[eelofwest]

So from where I sit no one knows the actual total tv audience fit the swans v giants game for Sydney. We know free to air and that's it. The rest is just speculation either for or against higher or lower numbers!!

oh we know it .. or near enough to it just fine
its just not a figure vicky kicky cheerleaders in here want to acknowledge

"We"

Is that your multiple personalities Dave? Dumb and dumber?

It is to early in the morning for xman to figure out things dave, go easy on him will ya.......

[Fred]

It's a hypothesis RD but how do you prove it?

[Raiderdave]

It's a hypothesis RD but how do you prove it?

how does one prove a tree falling in the forest makes a sound

one can't

but we all know it does

[Xman]

It's a hypothesis RD but how do you prove it?

how does one prove a tree falling in the forest makes a sound

one can't

but we all know it does

You drop a tree in a forest....

[Stewie]

It's a hypothesis RD but how do you prove it?

how does one prove a tree falling in the forest makes a sound

one can't

but we all know it does

In other words, Raiderdave cannot prove a thing because he makes it all up.

[piesman2011]

It's a hypothesis RD but how do you prove it?

how does one prove a tree falling in the forest makes a sound

one can't

but we all know it does

It can't be a hypothesis, he would require an education before he could make one of those.

[piesman2011]

Hey Raiderdave can you tell me if the NRL is soooooo hugh with people watching it on the box, why are so many of its clubs giung broke, .

so Hugh
who's Hugh ... your boyfriend ?

and anyway dickface
the NRL & its clubs just signed a media rights deal of nearing 1.3 Billion dollars as a result of its complete dominance of this medium in the last 5 years or so
so its clubs will benefit financially from this ... from now on
an extra 3 million per club per year for the next 5 .... & thats just the start

& I have a question for you

if the VFL is sooooooooo .... .... hugh .. with all its crowds & memberships
why are so many of its clubs ..gooig.. guing.... gargling ? ...... what ?.... going was what he was trying to spell ? ...... oh ok .... going broke ?

anything to add here you illiterate halfwit ?

Why do you keep using the made up figure of 1.3 billion. John grant said you got just over 1.2 billion. Is it because the AFL got a bit over 1.3 billion which makes your made up 1.3 billion figure almost as big?

[Raiderdave]

It's a hypothesis RD but how do you prove it?

how does one prove a tree falling in the forest makes a sound

one can't

but we all know it does

You drop a tree in a forest....

depends what I've eaten

[Raiderdave]

Hey Raiderdave can you tell me if the NRL is soooooo hugh with people watching it on the box, why are so many of its clubs giung broke, .

so Hugh
who's Hugh ... your boyfriend ?

and anyway dickface
the NRL & its clubs just signed a media rights deal of nearing 1.3 Billion dollars as a result of its complete dominance of this medium in the last 5 years or so
so its clubs will benefit financially from this ... from now on
an extra 3 million per club per year for the next 5 .... & thats just the start

& I have a question for you

if the VFL is sooooooooo .... .... hugh .. with all its crowds & memberships
why are so many of its clubs ..gooig.. guing.... gargling ? ...... what ?.... going was what he was trying to spell ? ...... oh ok .... going broke ?

anything to add here you illiterate halfwit ?

Why do you keep using the made up figure of 1.3 billion. John grant said you got just over 1.2 billion. Is it because the AFL got a bit over 1.3 billion which makes your made up 1.3 billion figure almost as big?

the VFL got 1.253 Billion
not a penny more

the NRL got more then this as has been proven ad nauism

end of

[Xman]

Never proven two of the deals weren't even disclosed

The only proof we have is your own bosses admission which sunk you completely

[piesman2011]

so Hugh
who's Hugh ... your boyfriend ?

and anyway dickface
the NRL & its clubs just signed a media rights deal of nearing 1.3 Billion dollars as a result of its complete dominance of this medium in the last 5 years or so
so its clubs will benefit financially from this ... from now on
an extra 3 million per club per year for the next 5 .... & thats just the start

& I have a question for you

if the VFL is sooooooooo .... .... hugh .. with all its crowds & memberships
why are so many of its clubs ..gooig.. guing.... gargling ? ...... what ?.... going was what he was trying to spell ? ...... oh ok .... going broke ?

anything to add here you illiterate halfwit ?

Why do you keep using the made up figure of 1.3 billion. John grant said you got just over 1.2 billion. Is it because the AFL got a bit over 1.3 billion which makes your made up 1.3 billion figure almost as big?

the VFL got 1.253 Billion
not a penny more

the NRL got more then this as has been proven ad nauism

end of

Been proven from sources the NRL got 1.2 billion.
The AFL got 1.326 billion if you include naming and radio rights into the equation which is what is included in the NRLs 1.2 billion. Do I need to link you the source again?

[Fred]

Why do you keep arguing with rd?? He throws bait and you all bite! You know the facts , we all do, yet when he puts up erroneous figures and arguments you all bite. The AFL could get 100 000 at every game and the nrl 10 000 and he is still going to say the nrl gets better crowds .... In fact that's almost what happens ??? At least with ratings on tv the old regional figures debate can be justified as plausible. But crowd numbers is Plain and simple re AFL getting much better crowds ... Even in Sydney generally.

[Xman]

Why do you keep arguing with rd?? He throws bait and you all bite! You know the facts , we all do, yet when he puts up erroneous figures and arguments you all bite. The AFL could get 100 000 at every game and the nrl 10 000 and he is still going to say the nrl gets better crowds .... In fact that's almost what happens ??? At least with ratings on tv the old regional figures debate can be justified as plausible. But crowd numbers is Plain and simple re AFL getting much better crowds ... Even in Sydney generally.

I agree with you, but this is a fight club. Arguments are part of it, even with people in denial like Dave.

The AFL could average 50k per game and Dave would simply move to "but not in Sydney". If that began to happen he would move to "the numbers are fudged"

Whatever he says the AFLs first 2 rounds this year will outdraw the NRLs first 5.

How are you going to spin that Dave?