Page 2 of 3

Re: Who's willing to bet?

Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 8:36 pm
by Stewie
Raiderdave wrote:
Drac wrote:
King-Eliagh wrote:
Games in which GWS are officially recorded as the home team. And the same for the Penny Panthers.

You happy with this? I'm still not 100% sure I'm keen to bet on this one as it would be an amazing feat if the Panthers could win it. I mean they've got so much stacked against them in this.

1. Location - Penrith vs Homebush
2. Competition for crowds - Penrith vis a vis all other Sydney RL clubs - GWS vis a vis the Swans
3. Crowd culture - Everyone knows RL looks great on TV while marngrook doesnt quite cut it on the big screen

But still this one could be close, such is the dominance of RL in sydney :)
Deal. The Giants aren't without their disadvantages:

1. Only 1 game against a local team to bring "away" fans, vs 5 for the Panthers.
2. Giants have 3 games at a 10k seat stadium in Canberra.3.
Giants are a 2 year old AFL team in League heartland, Panthers are a 47 year old League club in League heartland.

Giants will still win.
:lol: :lol:

since when has Manuka held just 10K dickhead

it holds about 14,500
try posting facts next time & enough with your excuses for why you'll lose

its your fucking bet
& all we get when someone takes it is

oh



ummmm


welll



I mean FMD what a bunch of welching Arseholes


:lol: :lol: :lol:

10k seated . Ever heard of standing room dick head? FMD you're a dunce. #-o

EDIT: Pies beat me to it.

Re: Who's willing to bet?

Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:06 pm
by Raiderdave
Stewie wrote:

10k seated . Ever heard of standing room dick head? FMD you're a dunce. #-o

EDIT: Pies beat me to it

:lol: :lol: :lol:
the cockhead was suggesting the capacity of Manuka was 10K ... not the numb of seats
I mean
who the F talks about the numb of seats at a venue for F sake :lol: :lol: :lol:

nice try
but it was just more utter shit from another ignorant knows F all ... singletball fan :cool:

Re: Who's willing to bet?

Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:13 pm
by Stewie
Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:

10k seated . Ever heard of standing room dick head? FMD you're a dunce. #-o

EDIT: Pies beat me to it

:lol: :lol: :lol:
the cockhead was suggesting the capacity of Manuka was 10K ... not the numb of seats
I mean
who the F talks about the numb of seats at a venue for F sake :lol: :lol: :lol:

nice try
but it was just more utter shit from another ignorant knows F all ... singletball fan :cool:
but but but :lol:

Drac clearly said 10 seated. Got it? Good. :cool:

Re: Who's willing to bet?

Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:15 pm
by Raiderdave
piesman2011 wrote:
Surely Dave you can't be that dumb. He never said holds he said seats. How many seats does Manuka stadium have? Come on answer the question. Are you ever write (sic) about anything. It's a stadium in Canberra for Gods sake. Do you actually live in Canberra?

one talks in terms of seats
when thats all a stadium has

Canberra Stadium is a 25,000 SEAT stadium , also its listed capacity :wink:

but no one talks of the number of seats at a ground if it has both seats & a grassed area
Brookvale has about 7K seats
but no one talks of this .... only its capacity of 20K

no
our little drac ... just didn't have any idea that Manuka holds 14.5K
typical of the ignorant fucksticks who follow VFL :cool:

Re: Who's willing to bet?

Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:18 pm
by Raiderdave
Stewie wrote:
Drac clearly said 10 seated.

he clearly fucked up
no one talks only of the numb of seats in a ground

its ok
hes one of your lot
& its rare you lot get anything right , so its no surprise to us dickbrain :wink:

Re: Who's willing to bet?

Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:41 pm
by Stewie
Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
Drac clearly said 10 seated.

he clearly fucked up
no one talks only of the numb of seats in a ground

its ok
hes one of your lot
& its rare you lot get anything right , so its no surprise to us dickbrain :wink:
Drac rarely, if ever fucks up. You on the other hand are an embarrassment with your mistakes and ******** estimates and claiming they're facts. :lol:

Re: Who's willing to bet?

Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 10:09 pm
by piesman2011
Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
Drac clearly said 10 seated.

he clearly fucked up
no one talks only of the numb of seats in a ground

its ok
hes one of your lot
& its rare you lot get anything right , so its no surprise to us dickbrain :wink:
Say it with me:

I RaiderDave get powned all the time on this forum. It is nothing new. What is new is that this time I'm willing to man up and admit my mistake and not talk dribble or slink away.

Re: Who's willing to bet?

Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 10:23 pm
by Drac
King-Eliagh wrote:
Drac wrote:
King-Eliagh wrote:
Games in which GWS are officially recorded as the home team. And the same for the Penny Panthers.

You happy with this? I'm still not 100% sure I'm keen to bet on this one as it would be an amazing feat if the Panthers could win it. I mean they've got so much stacked against them in this.

1. Location - Penrith vs Homebush
2. Competition for crowds - Penrith vis a vis all other Sydney RL clubs - GWS vis a vis the Swans
3. Crowd culture - Everyone knows RL looks great on TV while marngrook doesnt quite cut it on the big screen

But still this one could be close, such is the dominance of RL in sydney :)
Deal. The Giants aren't without their disadvantages:

1. Only 1 game against a local team to bring "away" fans, vs 5 for the Panthers.
2. Giants have 3 games at a 10k seat stadium in Canberra.
3. Giants are a 2 year old AFL team in League heartland, Panthers are a 47 year old League club in League heartland.

Giants will still win.
Alright drac lets do this bet but I'd like to reduce the wager because I'm scared I could lose. And how do we obtain the figures?
how about avatars just 'till the end of the year (so Sept 1- Dec 31). We'll go by official crowd figures, as that's all we can go by. There looked to be well under 10k people at Penriff on the weekend, but the official figure is 10,882, so i'll accept it.

Re: Who's willing to bet?

Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 10:28 pm
by Drac
Raiderdave wrote:
piesman2011 wrote:
Surely Dave you can't be that dumb. He never said holds he said seats. How many seats does Manuka stadium have? Come on answer the question. Are you ever write (sic) about anything. It's a stadium in Canberra for Gods sake. Do you actually live in Canberra?

one talks in terms of seats
when thats all a stadium has

Canberra Stadium is a 25,000 SEAT stadium , also its listed capacity :wink:

but no one talks of the number of seats at a ground if it has both seats & a grassed area
Brookvale has about 7K seats
but no one talks of this .... only its capacity of 20K

no
our little drac ... just didn't have any idea that Manuka holds 14.5K
typical of the ignorant fucksticks who follow VFL :cool:
People don't stand at AFL games. It's beneath us. The games go for too long, and our stick-like legs get tired. The seated and standing capacity of the new Adelaide oval will be 53,000. But when people ask what the capacity is, we say 50,000, because noo ne gives a sh*t about standing room.

Re: Who's willing to bet?

Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 10:37 pm
by Stewie
Drac wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:


one talks in terms of seats
when thats all a stadium has

Canberra Stadium is a 25,000 SEAT stadium , also its listed capacity :wink:

but no one talks of the number of seats at a ground if it has both seats & a grassed area
Brookvale has about 7K seats
but no one talks of this .... only its capacity of 20K

no
our little drac ... just didn't have any idea that Manuka holds 14.5K
typical of the ignorant fucksticks who follow VFL :cool:
People don't stand at AFL games. It's beneath us. The games go for too long, and our stick-like legs get tired. The seated and standing capacity of the new Adelaide oval will be 53,000. But when people ask what the capacity is, we say 50,000, because noo ne gives a sh*t about standing room.
This is true. Although at Adelaide Oval, standing on the Hill for a football game will be very fun. Especially at Showdowns and big games against teams like Collingwood. :wink:

Re: Who's willing to bet?

Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 7:48 am
by Raiderdave
piesman2011 wrote:
Say it with me:

I RaiderDave get powned all the time on this forum
.


I get what now ? 8-[

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

oh good lord :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Who's willing to bet?

Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 9:03 am
by piesman2011
Raiderdave wrote:
piesman2011 wrote:
Say it with me:

I RaiderDave get powned all the time on this forum
.


I get what now ? 8-[

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

oh good lord :lol: :lol: :lol:

Man up you weak little girl. Or do I have to bitch slap you again.

Re: Who's willing to bet?

Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 2:31 pm
by King-Eliagh
Drac wrote:


how about avatars just 'till the end of the year (so Sept 1- Dec 31). We'll go by official crowd figures, as that's all we can go by. There looked to be well under 10k people at Penriff on the weekend, but the official figure is 10,882, so i'll accept it.
Deal. Nice first up crowd for the penny panthers :)

Re: Who's willing to bet?

Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 2:35 pm
by King-Eliagh
Raiderdave is dead right. Drac fucked up. We were discussing what was the drawbacks of each team in terms of getting crowd NUMBERS to the game. The largest crowd wins and therefore Drac shoulda taken into account that there's capacity for 14,500 and if he knew anything about marngrook footy at manuka he'd know the crowd stand all game when there's no seats there. Pies you seem very frazzled which isnt like your normal self. Has dave got you frazzled?

Re: Who's willing to bet?

Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:09 pm
by piesman2011
King-Eliagh wrote:
Raiderdave is dead right. Drac fucked up. We were discussing what was the drawbacks of each team in terms of getting crowd NUMBERS to the game. The largest crowd wins and therefore Drac shoulda taken into account that there's capacity for 14,500 and if he knew anything about marngrook footy at manuka he'd know the crowd stand all game when there's no seats there. Pies you seem very frazzled which isnt like your normal self. Has dave got you frazzled?

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Your kidding. Dave got destroyed and now your making yourself look like a fool by supporting him. =D> =D>