Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave saying that only 15k - 18k of the Swans members would be based in NSW this year. Proven wrong. Stop trying to defend the resident ******, KE.

Tut tut The AFL invalidly call the ACT NSW. Such is their ignorance to the state boundaries in this country. How many thousand from the ACT are swannies members? That's what we need to be asking. I'd say prob 4 - 6k. That'd put Dave as correct. Bang on the money. All the while you tossers are premie ejaculating all over the place, looking like a pack of pimply faced teenagers being caught out glueing the pages together of their first porn mag

6k of the swans 22k are from the ACT? Prove it

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Premieboy wrote:

They swans will have more nsw members than any NSW NRL club this year

In what is basically a one team state and including ACT members. Xman you're making quite the mess with your premie ejaculations there

Swans plus giants equals how many teams dumbarse? Basically two

Together they should have about 45k members this year. Compare that to the storms 10k.....

Stewie wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave saying that only 15k - 18k of the Swans members would be based in NSW this year. Proven wrong. Stop trying to defend the resident ******, KE.

Tut tut The AFL invalidly call the ACT NSW. Such is their ignorance to the state boundaries in this country. How many thousand from the ACT are swannies members? That's what we need to be asking. I'd say prob 4 - 6k. That'd put Dave as correct. Bang on the money. All the while you tossers are premie ejaculating all over the place, looking like a pack of pimply faced teenagers being caught out glueing the pages together of their first porn mag

Why don't you ask the Swans how many members are ACT based? I already asked how many are from NSW, 22,000 of them.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Stewie wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Tut tut The AFL invalidly call the ACT NSW. Such is their ignorance to the state boundaries in this country. How many thousand from the ACT are swannies members? That's what we need to be asking. I'd say prob 4 - 6k. That'd put Dave as correct. Bang on the money. All the while you tossers are premie ejaculating all over the place, looking like a pack of pimply faced teenagers being caught out glueing the pages together of their first porn mag

Why don't you ask the Swans how many members are ACT based? I already asked how many are from NSW, 22,000 of them.

You're already all chummy with em. You ask. Until then we must acknowledge that the ACT has a better than Sydney backing of the game, generally percentage wise speaking. So until you find the figures my conservative estimation is the best we have.

King-Eliagh wrote:

ahhh. the AFL havent on previous occassions. whats to say they havent this time? It's more than likely I'd say. In fact I think when i was playing for a sydney team last year it said NSW ACT on my shorts. I'll get back to you after I head home on that one

Stewie wrote:

Whenever the Sydney Swans membership tally is mentioned most nRL fans led by Raiderdave will respond with something along the lines of "most of their members are based outside of NSW" or Raiderdave's classic "only 15,000 reside in NSW". But now with official evidence, we can prove this to be incorrect.

Currently out of the Swans total membership tally of 27,600, approximately 22,000 are based in New South Wales. Swannies... Sydney loves ya! =D> =D> =D>



Oh come on Raiderdave man... don't tear up . The majority of us have all known the Swans have been the biggest sports team in NSW for years.

Twitter link; https://twitter.com/SwansSupport/status ... 9984971778

FYI, Sydney Swans Support is the Swans' official membership Twitter account. It appears on the membership section of their website. http://membership.sydneyswans.com.au/

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Whenever the Sydney Swans membership tally is mentioned most nRL fans led by Raiderdave will respond with something along the lines of "most of their members are based outside of NSW" or Raiderdave's classic "only 15,000 reside in NSW". But now with official evidence, we can prove this to be incorrect.

Currently out of the Swans total membership tally of 27,600, approximately 22,000 are based in New South Wales. Swannies... Sydney loves ya! =D> =D> =D>



Oh come on Raiderdave man... don't tear up . The majority of us have all known the Swans have been the biggest sports team in NSW for years.

Twitter link; https://twitter.com/SwansSupport/status ... 9984971778

FYI, Sydney Swans Support is the Swans' official membership Twitter account. It appears on the membership section of their website. http://membership.sydneyswans.com.au/

as If you'd believe some lying cockhead from their club

its a well known fact

about 12K of their members reside in spazbourne
end of

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Whenever the Sydney Swans membership tally is mentioned most nRL fans led by Raiderdave will respond with something along the lines of "most of their members are based outside of NSW" or Raiderdave's classic "only 15,000 reside in NSW". But now with official evidence, we can prove this to be incorrect.

Currently out of the Swans total membership tally of 27,600, approximately 22,000 are based in New South Wales. Swannies... Sydney loves ya! =D> =D> =D>



Oh come on Raiderdave man... don't tear up . The majority of us have all known the Swans have been the biggest sports team in NSW for years.

Twitter link; https://twitter.com/SwansSupport/status ... 9984971778

FYI, Sydney Swans Support is the Swans' official membership Twitter account. It appears on the membership section of their website. http://membership.sydneyswans.com.au/

as If you'd believe some lying cockhead from their club

its a well known fact

about 12K of their members reside in spazbourne
end of

King-Eliagh wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave saying that only 15k - 18k of the Swans members would be based in NSW this year. Proven wrong. Stop trying to defend the resident ******, KE.

Tut tut The AFL invalidly call the ACT NSW. Such is their ignorance to the state boundaries in this country. How many thousand from the ACT are swannies members? That's what we need to be asking. I'd say prob 4 - 6k. That'd put Dave as correct. Bang on the money. All the while you tossers are premie ejaculating all over the place, looking like a pack of pimply faced teenagers being caught out glueing the pages together of their first porn mag

piesman wrote:

Even if this was true and I don't believe it for a second

piesman wrote:

the Swans will end up with another 10k members by the time everyone buys their membership. That's at least 22K - 4-6K (your Canberra numbers)+10k more - 3K more (just in case there are a few more Canberra/melbourne members) = 23 to 25K NSW only members. So even with your dodgy figures RaiderDave is still very wrong as usual.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Piesman piesman piesman. I expect better from you.

piesman wrote:

Even if this was true and I don't believe it for a second

Ahhh how's about we start with this lovely amalgamated nsw/act website. http://www.aflnswact.com.au/ why oh why didnt you take the word of a bloke who's played several seasons in the sydney AFL eh? I mean I've got first hand experience yet you seem swayed by some confused buffoon from melbourne who knows jack diddly on most topics. tsk tsk tsk

piesman wrote:

the Swans will end up with another 10k members by the time everyone buys their membership. That's at least 22K - 4-6K (your Canberra numbers)+10k more - 3K more (just in case there are a few more Canberra/melbourne members) = 23 to 25K NSW only members. So even with your dodgy figures RaiderDave is still very wrong as usual.

ohhh piesman you've dropped the ball again ol son. I stated stewie and co were having a mass group premature ejaculation didnt I?

So I guess the best lesson for you here piesman is to never go quoting me as though I'm wrong again. Stick to that rule and you'll not be made a fool of by me again my friend.

Now run along now ya lil scamp gooo-oooon!

Stewie wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Piesman piesman piesman. I expect better from you.

piesman wrote:

Even if this was true and I don't believe it for a second

Ahhh how's about we start with this lovely amalgamated nsw/act website. http://www.aflnswact.com.au/ why oh why didnt you take the word of a bloke who's played several seasons in the sydney AFL eh? I mean I've got first hand experience yet you seem swayed by some confused buffoon from melbourne who knows jack diddly on most topics. tsk tsk tsk

piesman wrote:

the Swans will end up with another 10k members by the time everyone buys their membership. That's at least 22K - 4-6K (your Canberra numbers)+10k more - 3K more (just in case there are a few more Canberra/melbourne members) = 23 to 25K NSW only members. So even with your dodgy figures RaiderDave is still very wrong as usual.

ohhh piesman you've dropped the ball again ol son. I stated stewie and co were having a mass group premature ejaculation didnt I?

So I guess the best lesson for you here piesman is to never go quoting me as though I'm wrong again. Stick to that rule and you'll not be made a fool of by me again my friend.

Now run along now ya lil scamp gooo-oooon!

So in other words, you've still got no evidence that the 22k figure includes ACT.

You're as bad as Raiderdave, convincing yourself that your lies are facts.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Ah because prior to gws playing their closest team was the swans Given there's a bit of culture for marngrook down there my bet is safe as houses that there'd be more than a few thou members down that way.

And stewie get back on twitter and ask your chum bum whether the nsw figure includes the act. Its what the AFL do and have done for some time. They amalgamate nsw and act as though its one big state. Quite disrespectful to the canberrans i must say, but hey it makes fools like you think the AFL is huuuuge in nsw, so i guess with submissive brainless sheep as supporters why wouldnt you exploit their naivety?

Submissive brainless sheep

Now get on twitter stewie and prove me right!