Talking Footy

Tippett should have got two years! He knew more about what he was doing than ANY Storm player!!

The Storm paid a huge price. Two premierships gone and having to play a season without any premiership points, which in effect is a season's suspension for the entire club!!!!

Want to try again, X?

Striker wrote:

Tippett should have got two years! He knew more about what he was doing than ANY Storm player!!

The Storm paid a huge price. Two premierships gone and having to play a season without any premiership points, which in effect is a season's suspension for the entire club!!!!

Want to try again, X?

The storm players got off scott free

Tippett got fined and banned.

The Storms penalties were retrospective, allowing them to continue dominating the league. Adelaide's penalty will affect them prospectively for years to come.

Bull$hit.

Storm players had to play for no premiership points, and had two premierships taken off them. If you think that's scot free you're dreamin'!

Tippett should have got two years and you can't argue against that.

Striker wrote:

Bull$hit.

Storm players had to play for no premiership points, and had two premierships taken off them. If you think that's scot free you're dreamin'!

Tippett should have got two years and you can't argue against that.

Striker wrote:

Bull$hit.

Storm players had to play for no premiership points, and had two premierships taken off them. If you think that's scot free you're dreamin'!

Tippett should have got two years and you can't argue against that.

They got no financial penalty and no ban.

Xman wrote:

Striker wrote:

Bull$hit.

Storm players had to play for no premiership points, and had two premierships taken off them. If you think that's scot free you're dreamin'!

Tippett should have got two years and you can't argue against that.

They got no financial penalty and no ban.

because they did nothing wrong you bilthering F wit ...

Ken Troppot admitted knowing his contract was illegal
this piece of cheating filth should have been banned for life

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Striker wrote:

Bull$hit.

Storm players had to play for no premiership points, and had two premierships taken off them. If you think that's scot free you're dreamin'!

Tippett should have got two years and you can't argue against that.

They got no financial penalty and no ban.

because they did nothing wrong you bilthering F wit ...

Ken Troppot admitted knowing his contract was illegal
this piece of cheating filth should have been banned for life

nah, everyone has duplicate contracts with different details...

Xman wrote:

Striker wrote:

Bull$hit.

Storm players had to play for no premiership points, and had two premierships taken off them. If you think that's scot free you're dreamin'!

Tippett should have got two years and you can't argue against that.

They got no financial penalty and no ban.

What? The Storm played for NO PREMIERSHIP POINTS! Hello! That equals a F**ING BAN, EINSTEIN!! A ban from the finals AND the extra revenue we would have got from it! No financial penalty? As some AFL doofus down here used to say; Pig's Arse!

Striker wrote:

Xman wrote:

Striker wrote:

Bull$hit.

Storm players had to play for no premiership points, and had two premierships taken off them. If you think that's scot free you're dreamin'!

Tippett should have got two years and you can't argue against that.

They got no financial penalty and no ban.

What? The Storm played for NO PREMIERSHIP POINTS! Hello! That equals a F**ING BAN, EINSTEIN!! A ban from the finals AND the extra revenue we would have got from it! No financial penalty? As some AFL doofus down here used to say; Pig's Arse!

No it doesn't. They still enjoyed their win at the time. They still got to play the following years with full pay. They then went on their merry way dominating the next few years too.

Striker wrote:

Xman wrote:

Striker wrote:

Bull$hit.

Storm players had to play for no premiership points, and had two premierships taken off them. If you think that's scot free you're dreamin'!

Tippett should have got two years and you can't argue against that.

They got no financial penalty and no ban.

What? The Storm played for NO PREMIERSHIP POINTS! Hello! That equals a F**ING BAN, EINSTEIN!! A ban from the finals AND the extra revenue we would have got from it! No financial penalty? As some AFL doofus down here used to say; Pig's Arse!

A ban would mean they were banned from playing matches, idiot! Just like Tippett is.

Wrong! Banned means not playing for premiership points and not playing finals!!

X, a good club cleans itself up quick smart and turns a negative into a positive. That's what the Storm did. We took our medicine and came back snarling.

Striker wrote:

Wrong! Banned means not playing for premiership points and not playing finals!!

X, a good club cleans itself up quick smart and turns a negative into a positive. That's what the Storm did. We took our medicine and came back snarling.

Umm no lol. Whenever someone is found guilty in at the tribunal, they say "player x is banned from playing 2 matches" etc. Banned = being banned from playing. You cannot dispute that.

So where are the premiership points from the Storm "playing" huh? You cannot dispute THAT! It was a BAN, Einstein! Playing pedantics doesn't work, bright boy!

Striker wrote:

So where are the premiership points from the Storm "playing" huh? You cannot dispute THAT! It was a BAN, Einstein! Playing pedantics doesn't work, bright boy!

They played, they were paid. Not a ban

They played for nothing and no reward. A ban! If we played and were paid for it, where was our finals appearance?

X = no idea.