Question?

Which is the best football code? Here you can have it out with other football fans.
Striker
Coach
Coach
Posts: 1053
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 9:14 pm
Team: Melbourne Storm
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Question?

Post by Striker »

Tippett should have got two years! He knew more about what he was doing than ANY Storm player!!

The Storm paid a huge price. Two premierships gone and having to play a season without any premiership points, which in effect is a season's suspension for the entire club!!!!

Want to try again, X?
User avatar
Xman
Coach
Coach
Posts: 13919
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
Team: Essendon
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Question?

Post by Xman »

Striker wrote:
Tippett should have got two years! He knew more about what he was doing than ANY Storm player!!

The Storm paid a huge price. Two premierships gone and having to play a season without any premiership points, which in effect is a season's suspension for the entire club!!!!

Want to try again, X?
The storm players got off scott free :roll:

Tippett got fined and banned.

The Storms penalties were retrospective, allowing them to continue dominating the league. Adelaide's penalty will affect them prospectively for years to come.
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
Striker
Coach
Coach
Posts: 1053
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 9:14 pm
Team: Melbourne Storm
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Question?

Post by Striker »

Bull$hit.

Storm players had to play for no premiership points, and had two premierships taken off them. If you think that's scot free you're dreamin'!

Tippett should have got two years and you can't argue against that.
Stewie
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2771
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:03 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Football Club
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Question?

Post by Stewie »

Striker wrote:
Bull$hit.

Storm players had to play for no premiership points, and had two premierships taken off them. If you think that's scot free you're dreamin'!

Tippett should have got two years and you can't argue against that.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Raiderdave wrote:

7K is a tremendous turnout
Image
User avatar
Xman
Coach
Coach
Posts: 13919
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
Team: Essendon
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Question?

Post by Xman »

Striker wrote:
Bull$hit.

Storm players had to play for no premiership points, and had two premierships taken off them. If you think that's scot free you're dreamin'!

Tippett should have got two years and you can't argue against that.
They got no financial penalty and no ban.
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Question?

Post by Raiderdave »

Xman wrote:
Striker wrote:
Bull$hit.

Storm players had to play for no premiership points, and had two premierships taken off them. If you think that's scot free you're dreamin'!

Tippett should have got two years and you can't argue against that.
They got no financial penalty and no ban.

because they did nothing wrong you bilthering F wit ...

Ken Troppot admitted knowing his contract was illegal
this piece of cheating filth should have been banned for life [-( [-( [-(
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
User avatar
Xman
Coach
Coach
Posts: 13919
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
Team: Essendon
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Question?

Post by Xman »

Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Striker wrote:
Bull$hit.

Storm players had to play for no premiership points, and had two premierships taken off them. If you think that's scot free you're dreamin'!

Tippett should have got two years and you can't argue against that.
They got no financial penalty and no ban.

because they did nothing wrong you bilthering F wit ...

Ken Troppot admitted knowing his contract was illegal
this piece of cheating filth should have been banned for life [-( [-( [-(
:lol: :lol: :lol: nah, everyone has duplicate contracts with different details... :lol:
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
Striker
Coach
Coach
Posts: 1053
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 9:14 pm
Team: Melbourne Storm
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Question?

Post by Striker »

Xman wrote:
Striker wrote:
Bull$hit.

Storm players had to play for no premiership points, and had two premierships taken off them. If you think that's scot free you're dreamin'!

Tippett should have got two years and you can't argue against that.
They got no financial penalty and no ban.
What? The Storm played for NO PREMIERSHIP POINTS! Hello! That equals a F**ING BAN, EINSTEIN!! A ban from the finals AND the extra revenue we would have got from it! No financial penalty? As some AFL doofus down here used to say; Pig's Arse!
User avatar
Xman
Coach
Coach
Posts: 13919
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
Team: Essendon
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Question?

Post by Xman »

Striker wrote:
Xman wrote:
Striker wrote:
Bull$hit.

Storm players had to play for no premiership points, and had two premierships taken off them. If you think that's scot free you're dreamin'!

Tippett should have got two years and you can't argue against that.
They got no financial penalty and no ban.
What? The Storm played for NO PREMIERSHIP POINTS! Hello! That equals a F**ING BAN, EINSTEIN!! A ban from the finals AND the extra revenue we would have got from it! No financial penalty? As some AFL doofus down here used to say; Pig's Arse!
No it doesn't. They still enjoyed their win at the time. They still got to play the following years with full pay. They then went on their merry way dominating the next few years too. :roll:
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
Stewie
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2771
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:03 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Football Club
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Question?

Post by Stewie »

Striker wrote:
Xman wrote:
Striker wrote:
Bull$hit.

Storm players had to play for no premiership points, and had two premierships taken off them. If you think that's scot free you're dreamin'!

Tippett should have got two years and you can't argue against that.
They got no financial penalty and no ban.
What? The Storm played for NO PREMIERSHIP POINTS! Hello! That equals a F**ING BAN, EINSTEIN!! A ban from the finals AND the extra revenue we would have got from it! No financial penalty? As some AFL doofus down here used to say; Pig's Arse!
A ban would mean they were banned from playing matches, idiot! Just like Tippett is.
Raiderdave wrote:

7K is a tremendous turnout
Image
Striker
Coach
Coach
Posts: 1053
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 9:14 pm
Team: Melbourne Storm
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Question?

Post by Striker »

Wrong! Banned means not playing for premiership points and not playing finals!!

X, a good club cleans itself up quick smart and turns a negative into a positive. That's what the Storm did. We took our medicine and came back snarling.
Stewie
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2771
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:03 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Football Club
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Question?

Post by Stewie »

Striker wrote:
Wrong! Banned means not playing for premiership points and not playing finals!!

X, a good club cleans itself up quick smart and turns a negative into a positive. That's what the Storm did. We took our medicine and came back snarling.
Umm no lol. Whenever someone is found guilty in at the tribunal, they say "player x is banned from playing 2 matches" etc. Banned = being banned from playing. You cannot dispute that.
Raiderdave wrote:

7K is a tremendous turnout
Image
Striker
Coach
Coach
Posts: 1053
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 9:14 pm
Team: Melbourne Storm
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Question?

Post by Striker »

So where are the premiership points from the Storm "playing" huh? You cannot dispute THAT! It was a BAN, Einstein! Playing pedantics doesn't work, bright boy!
User avatar
Xman
Coach
Coach
Posts: 13919
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
Team: Essendon
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Question?

Post by Xman »

Striker wrote:
So where are the premiership points from the Storm "playing" huh? You cannot dispute THAT! It was a BAN, Einstein! Playing pedantics doesn't work, bright boy!
They played, they were paid. Not a ban
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
Striker
Coach
Coach
Posts: 1053
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 9:14 pm
Team: Melbourne Storm
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Question?

Post by Striker »

They played for nothing and no reward. A ban! If we played and were paid for it, where was our finals appearance?

X = no idea.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 6 guests