Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:40 pm
Proof or gfto.ParraEelsNRL wrote:You went as low as 500 million at another site spewart, so did the xhuman.
www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
Proof or gfto.ParraEelsNRL wrote:You went as low as 500 million at another site spewart, so did the xhuman.
As I thought, no proof.ParraEelsNRL wrote:Make me.
All anyone has to do is type your various usernames into google and they are there for everyone to see.
And then there is your twitter account where you hound people all day for TV ratings and shit lol.
Stewie wrote:$1.253b > $1.025b. End ofRaiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:The nRL's coverage on tv is maxed out now, in future negotiations they won't be able to get much more money because they already have no matches clashing on TV as well as no more timeslots to open up. The AFL still has Monday night matches to one day fall back on and earn some more cold hard cash from, as well as twilight grand finals.
The nRL TV deal once again is shit, with only one FTA game going live, and all you say you're used to it. Used to shit coverage are you? Why do nRL fans just accept the shit that the nRL delivers them? I feel sorry for the poor fans who can't afford Foxtel and are forced to only watch crappy channel 9's woeful coverage![]()
![]()
![]()
this from a bloke who said we'd only get 700m ... & here we are about to most likely have the biggest deal in Aust Sport![]()
your expert analysis was somewhat astray there wasn't it spewie
![]()
![]()
Stewie wrote:As I thought, no proof.ParraEelsNRL wrote:Make me.
All anyone has to do is type your various usernames into google and they are there for everyone to see.
And then there is your twitter account where you hound people all day for TV ratings and shit lol.
Maybe the nRL really is worth nothing for online rightsRaiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:$1.253b > $1.025b. End ofRaiderdave wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
this from a bloke who said we'd only get 700m ... & here we are about to most likely have the biggest deal in Aust Sport![]()
your expert analysis was somewhat astray there wasn't it spewie
![]()
![]()
oh..............so we got nothing from the kiwis or for our online rights then ?
![]()
![]()
![]()
spewie the final figure is coming ... its on its way soon , are ya sleeping ok at nite ?
are ya a little apprehensive ?
are ya a bit.... scared shitless
fear .... its everywhere in here![]()
![]()
![]()
One game isn't going to cut it idiot!ParraEelsNRL wrote:Yep, that's why over 700,000 watched the Warriors in a single game on Pay TV last year, yep, 700,000 out of 4 million, not bad for Pay TV aye spewie?
That 4 million is the same population of Sydney, yet this moron says the Kiwis don't care when they can get that big number watching on PTV, hmmmm, don't the swines average around 50k on FTA in Sydney?
Bahahahahahahahahahahahahah
Stewie wrote:Maybe the nRL really is worth nothing for online rightsRaiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:$1.253b > $1.025b. End of
oh..............so we got nothing from the kiwis or for our online rights then ?
![]()
![]()
![]()
spewie the final figure is coming ... its on its way soon , are ya sleeping ok at nite ?
are ya a little apprehensive ?
are ya a bit.... scared shitless
fear .... its everywhere in here![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The Kiwi's don't care for your abortion of a sport. They know what real rugby is and what have any of this second rate league crap.
the warriors average more veiwers on PTV in NZStewie wrote:One game isn't going to cut it idiot!ParraEelsNRL wrote:Yep, that's why over 700,000 watched the Warriors in a single game on Pay TV last year, yep, 700,000 out of 4 million, not bad for Pay TV aye spewie?
That 4 million is the same population of Sydney, yet this moron says the Kiwis don't care when they can get that big number watching on PTV, hmmmm, don't the swines average around 50k on FTA in Sydney?
Bahahahahahahahahahahahahah
Raiderdave wrote:the warriors average more veiwers on PTV in NZStewie wrote:One game isn't going to cut it idiot!ParraEelsNRL wrote:Yep, that's why over 700,000 watched the Warriors in a single game on Pay TV last year, yep, 700,000 out of 4 million, not bad for Pay TV aye spewie?
That 4 million is the same population of Sydney, yet this moron says the Kiwis don't care when they can get that big number watching on PTV, hmmmm, don't the swines average around 50k on FTA in Sydney?
Bahahahahahahahahahahahahah
then the swines do on FTA in Sydney
if NZ'ers don't give a shit about RL as you say
then
what do Sydneysiders think of singleball ?
piesman2011 wrote:Raiderdave wrote:the warriors average more veiwers on PTV in NZStewie wrote:One game isn't going to cut it idiot!
then the swines do on FTA in Sydney
if NZ'ers don't give a shit about RL as you say
then
what do Sydneysiders think of singleball ?
I assume Sydneysiders think your pretty switched on with your superior knowledge of RL, but they would still laugh and call you one stone Dave behind your back.
Raiderdave wrote:piesman2011 wrote:Raiderdave wrote:the warriors average more veiwers on PTV in NZ
then the swines do on FTA in Sydney
if NZ'ers don't give a shit about RL as you say
then
what do Sydneysiders think of singleball ?
I assume Sydneysiders think your pretty switched on with your superior knowledge of RL, but they would still laugh and call you one stone Dave behind your back.![]()
WTF ?
Way to true and waaaaaaaay to funnyRaiderdave wrote:the warriors average more veiwers on PTV in NZStewie wrote:One game isn't going to cut it idiot!ParraEelsNRL wrote:Yep, that's why over 700,000 watched the Warriors in a single game on Pay TV last year, yep, 700,000 out of 4 million, not bad for Pay TV aye spewie?
That 4 million is the same population of Sydney, yet this moron says the Kiwis don't care when they can get that big number watching on PTV, hmmmm, don't the swines average around 50k on FTA in Sydney?
Bahahahahahahahahahahahahah
then the swines do on FTA in Sydney
if NZ'ers don't give a shit about RL as you say
then
what do Sydneysiders think of singletball ?