Page 2 of 5

Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:40 pm
by Stewie
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
You went as low as 500 million at another site spewart, so did the xhuman.
Proof or gfto.

Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:43 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Make me.

All anyone has to do is type your various usernames into google and they are there for everyone to see.

And then there is your twitter account where you hound people all day for TV ratings and shit lol.

Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:44 pm
by Stewie
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Make me.

All anyone has to do is type your various usernames into google and they are there for everyone to see.

And then there is your twitter account where you hound people all day for TV ratings and shit lol.
As I thought, no proof. :lol:

Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:50 pm
by Raiderdave
Stewie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
The nRL's coverage on tv is maxed out now, in future negotiations they won't be able to get much more money because they already have no matches clashing on TV as well as no more timeslots to open up. The AFL still has Monday night matches to one day fall back on and earn some more cold hard cash from, as well as twilight grand finals.

The nRL TV deal once again is shit, with only one FTA game going live, and all you say you're used to it. Used to shit coverage are you? Why do nRL fans just accept the shit that the nRL delivers them? I feel sorry for the poor fans who can't afford Foxtel and are forced to only watch crappy channel 9's woeful coverage :cry:
:lol: :lol: :lol:
this from a bloke who said we'd only get 700m ... & here we are about to most likely have the biggest deal in Aust Sport :wink:

your expert analysis was somewhat astray there wasn't it spewie
:lol: :lol: :lol:
$1.253b > $1.025b. End of :wink:

oh.............. :-k so we got nothing from the kiwis or for our online rights then ?

:lol: :lol: :lol:

spewie the final figure is coming ... its on its way soon , are ya sleeping ok at nite ?
are ya a little apprehensive ?
are ya a bit.... scared shitless


fear .... its everywhere in here :wink:

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:56 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Stewie wrote:
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Make me.

All anyone has to do is type your various usernames into google and they are there for everyone to see.

And then there is your twitter account where you hound people all day for TV ratings and shit lol.
As I thought, no proof. :lol:

Oh, the proof is there mr "NRL's Billion $$$ contract up in smoke". :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 1:00 pm
by Stewie
Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
:lol: :lol: :lol:
this from a bloke who said we'd only get 700m ... & here we are about to most likely have the biggest deal in Aust Sport :wink:

your expert analysis was somewhat astray there wasn't it spewie
:lol: :lol: :lol:
$1.253b > $1.025b. End of :wink:

oh.............. :-k so we got nothing from the kiwis or for our online rights then ?

:lol: :lol: :lol:

spewie the final figure is coming ... its on its way soon , are ya sleeping ok at nite ?
are ya a little apprehensive ?
are ya a bit.... scared shitless


fear .... its everywhere in here :wink:

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Maybe the nRL really is worth nothing for online rights :lol:

The Kiwi's don't care for your abortion of a sport. They know what real rugby is and what have any of this second rate league crap.

Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 1:16 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Yep, that's why over 700,000 watched the Warriors in a single game on Pay TV last year, yep, 700,000 out of 4 million, not bad for Pay TV aye spewie?

That 4 million is the same population of Sydney, yet this moron says the Kiwis don't care when they can get that big number watching on PTV, hmmmm, don't the swines average around 50k on FTA in Sydney?

Bahahahahahahahahahahahahah

Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 1:31 pm
by Stewie
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Yep, that's why over 700,000 watched the Warriors in a single game on Pay TV last year, yep, 700,000 out of 4 million, not bad for Pay TV aye spewie?

That 4 million is the same population of Sydney, yet this moron says the Kiwis don't care when they can get that big number watching on PTV, hmmmm, don't the swines average around 50k on FTA in Sydney?

Bahahahahahahahahahahahahah
One game isn't going to cut it idiot! :lol:

Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 1:44 pm
by Raiderdave
Stewie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
$1.253b > $1.025b. End of :wink:

oh.............. :-k so we got nothing from the kiwis or for our online rights then ?

:lol: :lol: :lol:

spewie the final figure is coming ... its on its way soon , are ya sleeping ok at nite ?
are ya a little apprehensive ?
are ya a bit.... scared shitless


fear .... its everywhere in here :wink:

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Maybe the nRL really is worth nothing for online rights :lol:

The Kiwi's don't care for your abortion of a sport. They know what real rugby is and what have any of this second rate league crap.

so please give us your best shot at what you think our total broadcast rights deal will be worth at its conclusion
no more then it is now ?
another 5m dollars ?
another 25m dollars ?

come on
have the b@lls to back up that large cake hole of yours & give us a figure

lets hope its closer then some of your previous efforts that we're still laughing our tits off at today :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 1:50 pm
by Raiderdave
Stewie wrote:
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Yep, that's why over 700,000 watched the Warriors in a single game on Pay TV last year, yep, 700,000 out of 4 million, not bad for Pay TV aye spewie?

That 4 million is the same population of Sydney, yet this moron says the Kiwis don't care when they can get that big number watching on PTV, hmmmm, don't the swines average around 50k on FTA in Sydney?

Bahahahahahahahahahahahahah
One game isn't going to cut it idiot! :lol:
the warriors average more veiwers on PTV in NZ
then the swines do on FTA in Sydney


if NZ'ers don't give a shit about RL as you say
then
what do Sydneysiders think of singletball ? :-k

Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:00 pm
by piesman2011
Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Yep, that's why over 700,000 watched the Warriors in a single game on Pay TV last year, yep, 700,000 out of 4 million, not bad for Pay TV aye spewie?

That 4 million is the same population of Sydney, yet this moron says the Kiwis don't care when they can get that big number watching on PTV, hmmmm, don't the swines average around 50k on FTA in Sydney?

Bahahahahahahahahahahahahah
One game isn't going to cut it idiot! :lol:
the warriors average more veiwers on PTV in NZ
then the swines do on FTA in Sydney


if NZ'ers don't give a shit about RL as you say
then
what do Sydneysiders think of singleball ? :-k

I assume Sydneysiders think your pretty switched on with your superior knowledge of RL, but they would still laugh and call you one stone Dave behind your back.

Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:19 pm
by Raiderdave
piesman2011 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
One game isn't going to cut it idiot! :lol:
the warriors average more veiwers on PTV in NZ
then the swines do on FTA in Sydney


if NZ'ers don't give a shit about RL as you say
then
what do Sydneysiders think of singleball ? :-k

I assume Sydneysiders think your pretty switched on with your superior knowledge of RL, but they would still laugh and call you one stone Dave behind your back.
8-[

WTF ?

Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:21 pm
by piesman2011
Raiderdave wrote:
piesman2011 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
the warriors average more veiwers on PTV in NZ
then the swines do on FTA in Sydney


if NZ'ers don't give a shit about RL as you say
then
what do Sydneysiders think of singleball ? :-k

I assume Sydneysiders think your pretty switched on with your superior knowledge of RL, but they would still laugh and call you one stone Dave behind your back.
8-[

WTF ?

A tille slow on the uptake there one stone.

Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:23 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Yep, that's why over 700,000 watched the Warriors in a single game on Pay TV last year, yep, 700,000 out of 4 million, not bad for Pay TV aye spewie?

That 4 million is the same population of Sydney, yet this moron says the Kiwis don't care when they can get that big number watching on PTV, hmmmm, don't the swines average around 50k on FTA in Sydney?

Bahahahahahahahahahahahahah
One game isn't going to cut it idiot! :lol:
the warriors average more veiwers on PTV in NZ
then the swines do on FTA in Sydney


if NZ'ers don't give a shit about RL as you say
then
what do Sydneysiders think of singletball ? :-k
Way to true and waaaaaaaay to funny :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Channel 9 rejects the nRL's draw

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:29 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
The Warriors would probably give the paddle pop wions (good one dave) and the swines a run when it comes to ratings.

And that's counting 6.5 million Aussies against 4 million kiwis. Oops, Warriors are on Pay TV while the other mob are on FTA :oops:

:mrgreen:

Yep, the Kiwis certainly don't care about RL :cry:

:lol: