Re: AFL Vs NRL (Memberships in 2013)
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 10:39 am
www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
Drac wrote:
wow ..... the number of cats & rabbits wearing purple in perth most have explodedXman wrote:Drac wrote:that just about beats the final figure for every NRL team, and its still 5 months until the season starts
Heres a few little secrets for you Dave:Raiderdave wrote:wow ..... the number of cats & rabbits wearing purple in perth most have explodedXman wrote:Drac wrote:that just about beats the final figure for every NRL team, and its still 5 months until the season starts
43K members in 2012
but only 33K as their average crowd![]()
now if they could just get get an outfit for gold fish ... well the sky's the limit for VFL memberships eh ?
but but butXman wrote:Heres a few little secrets for you Dave:Raiderdave wrote:wow ..... the number of cats & rabbits wearing purple in perth most have explodedXman wrote:that just about beats the final figure for every NRL team, and its still 5 months until the season starts
43K members in 2012
but only 33K as their average crowd![]()
now if they could just get get an outfit for gold fish ... well the sky's the limit for VFL memberships eh ?
- not every member goes to every game. Memberships give the club money which is the reason AFL fans take them out. Many would only intend on attending maybe 75% of games.
- there is such a thing as a non-attendance membership for people who live in other states or in the country.
Either way, they pay their money to the club which is the reason for the membership
Hmm http://www.rippledirect.com.au/images/c ... s_2011.pdfRaiderdave wrote:but but butXman wrote:Heres a few little secrets for you Dave:Raiderdave wrote:wow ..... the number of cats & rabbits wearing purple in perth most have exploded
43K members in 2012
but only 33K as their average crowd![]()
now if they could just get get an outfit for gold fish ... well the sky's the limit for VFL memberships eh ?
- not every member goes to every game. Memberships give the club money which is the reason AFL fans take them out. Many would only intend on attending maybe 75% of games.
- there is such a thing as a non-attendance membership for people who live in other states or in the country.
Either way, they pay their money to the club which is the reason for the membership![]()
![]()
wow .. out comes the VFL calculatorXman wrote:Hmm http://www.rippledirect.com.au/images/c ... s_2011.pdfRaiderdave wrote:but but butXman wrote:Heres a few little secrets for you Dave:
- not every member goes to every game. Memberships give the club money which is the reason AFL fans take them out. Many would only intend on attending maybe 75% of games.
- there is such a thing as a non-attendance membership for people who live in other states or in the country.
Either way, they pay their money to the club which is the reason for the membership![]()
![]()
Carlton made 7.8Million from memberships alone last year, almost 80% of the raiders entire annual revenue!![]()
![]()
![]()
But but but......
Well if you read their annual report Carlton made a 2mil profit.Raiderdave wrote:wow .. out comes the VFL calculatorXman wrote:Hmm http://www.rippledirect.com.au/images/c ... s_2011.pdfRaiderdave wrote:but but but![]()
![]()
Carlton made 7.8Million from memberships alone last year, almost 80% of the raiders entire annual revenue!![]()
![]()
![]()
But but but......![]()
![]()
![]()
since when as 7.8 Million been 80% of...... 61 Million
& again
Carltendon probably turned a tiny profit ... or none at all ... like most VFL clubs , meanwhile the Raiders posted a 3.4 Million dollar after tax profit![]()
so they aren't on a knifes edge like carlthorn ... who can't afford any downturn in revenue streams
any drop for any length of time & they're in deep do do
the Raiders are going along just fine & as they increase their memberships like all NRL clubs are , & get handed millions more TV bucks .. while only increasing their costs slightly
well its a cherry on the cake for this lil pocket dynamo of a club
so................ they didn't do as well as the Raiders ?Well if you read their annual report Carlton made a 2mil
2 million profit is better than a loss isn't it Dave?Raiderdave wrote:so................ they didn't do as well as the Raiders ?Well if you read their annual report Carlton made a 2mil
thanks
Xman wrote:2 million profit is better than a loss isn't it Dave?Raiderdave wrote:so................ they didn't do as well as the Raiders ?Well if you read their annual report Carlton made a 2mil
thanks![]()
Striker wrote: